1 / 11

Mind Readers

TJ Strzelecki (Presenting) Matt Waldersen Rick Schuman Krishna Jharjaria. Mind Readers. Patent Liability Anaysis. Major Functions Considered: EOG circuitry allows user to navigate a virtual system via eye gestures EEG allows user a selection method to select items in a virtual system

hong
Download Presentation

Mind Readers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TJ Strzelecki (Presenting) Matt Waldersen Rick Schuman Krishna Jharjaria Mind Readers

  2. Patent Liability Anaysis • Major Functions Considered: • EOG circuitry allows user to navigate a virtual system via eye gestures • EEG allows user a selection method to select items in a virtual system • Head Mounted display overlays applications onto a live video stream captured by an external camera • Applications displayed and movement allowed within a 3x3 matrix/grid • Search for patents with same or similar functionality to the Mind Reader

  3. Infringement Concerns • Devices that implement and perform the exact same functions as exactly as the Mind Reader • Devices that perform similar functions in a similar way as the Mind Reader • Broad Search: • Devices that use EOG signals for navigation • Devices that use EEG signals for selection • Devices that use augmented/virtual reality with an external camera and applications overlaid onto frame • Devices that use a grid or matrix format to provide navigation to subsections of the display

  4. Possible Infringement: US20060061544A1 • Filed March 9, 2005 by Samsung Electronics Co. • Apparatus and method for inputting keys using biological signals in a mobile Head Mounted Display • Virtual screen that includes a key map • EOG, EMG, EEG inputs • User can freely use the mobile Head Mounted Display communication terminal by movement of the user’s eyes and biting of their back teeth • Literal Infringement • EOG, EEG, HMD

  5. Literal Infringement US20060061544A1 • Claims: • Micro-display • Memory unit storing key-map information for the virtual screen display • Biological signal sensing unit • Recognition unit for the sensed biological signals • Control unit for connecting biological inputs to virtual keys • Literal, or at least Doctrine of Equivalents

  6. Possible Infringement: US20120146891A1 • Filed December 8, 2010 by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. • System for adapting a display screen output based on user’s attention. Gaze direction tracking used to determine a sub-region of a display screen area • Track gaze patterns of user using video image sensor • Map gaze patterns to physical locations of MxN grid on the display screen • Doctrine of Equivalents? • Gaze tracking, MxN grid

  7. Doctrine of EquivalentsUS20120146891A1 • Claims: • Tracking and mapping gaze patterns on MxN grid • Gaze tracker is used to track gaze pattern of user based on the collected image data frames • Adaptive display modifies the output by changing the resolution of the attended sub-region and unattended sub-regions • Movement based on eye gestures not patented, instead the method and results of movement consist of patent

  8. Possible Infringement: US20090289955A1 • Filed May 22, 2008 by Yahoo! Inc. • Method for capturing information that is pertinent to physical surrounding from at least one visual or audio information device and overlaying information for use • Automatically capture visual information • Automatically superimpose a transparent overlay, wherein the overlay provides images pertinent to and in correlation with the physical surroundings • Possible Doctrine of Equivalents • Overlaying applications on video feed

  9. Doctrine of Equivalents US20090289955A1 • Claims: • Automatically capture information that is pertinent to physical surroundings • Automatically obtain overlay information using at least a portion of the captured information • Automatically superimpose overlay information that is pertinent to and in correlation with the physical surroundings • Contact lawyer about the use of pertinent information in overlay

  10. Possible Actions • Remove functionality • Not feasible, the Mind Reader relies on the use of EOG, EEG, and HMD • Change the implementation technique • The device would move from Literal infringement to infringement under Doctrine of Equivalents • Obtain licenses or pay royalties to owners of patents • Viable option if the device were taken to market

  11. Questions

More Related