1 / 71

Intracanal medicaments

Intracanal medicaments. Nilesh Deshpande JR-II Department of pediatric and preventive dentistry. INTRODUCTION. An important objective of endodontic therapy is the removal of necrotic infected pulp and dentinal debris from the root canal system of infected or non-vital teeth.

honey
Download Presentation

Intracanal medicaments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Intracanal medicaments Nilesh Deshpande JR-II Department of pediatric and preventive dentistry

  2. INTRODUCTION • An important objective of endodontic therapy is the removal of necrotic infected pulp and dentinal debris from the root canal system of infected or non-vital teeth. • Failure to use an irrigating solution during BMP results in considerable amount of debris to be left behind in the root canal system ultimately leading to endodontic failure. • Hence for obtaining an optimum level of disinfection of the root canal system chemo-mechanical preparation is a must.

  3. HISTORY Prior to 1940’s Water was the most commonly used irrigant as it was: • Readily available. • Inexpensive. • Provided a lubricating effect during instrumentation.

  4. During 1940’s proteolytic enzymes like streptokinase, streptodomase, papain, etc. were being used as irrigating solutions because of their tissue dissolving property. • In 1943, Grossman introduced the concept of using oxidizing agents as irrigants. • In 1945, Daniel formulated an irrigating solution comprising of a amino-acridine. • In 1970’s chelating agents were used increasingly because of their biologically acceptable properties.

  5. IDEAL REQUIREMENTS • It should be an effective germicide and fungicide. • It should be non-irritating to the periapical tissues. • It should remain stable in solution. • It should have prolonged antimicrobial effect • It should be active in the presence of blood, serum and • protein derivatives of tissues. • It should have low surface tension. • It should not interfere with repair of periapical tissues. • It should not stain tooth structure • It should not induce cell mediated immune response. • It should be capable of inactivation in a culture medium.

  6. CATEGORIES OF USE That is conditions or situations for which intracanal medicaments have been advocated. • Elimination microorganisms. • Rendering contents of canal inert • Prevention or control of post treatment pain • Enhancing Anesthesia • Control of persistent periapical abscess

  7. CLASSIFICATIONS • According to DCNA • Phenolics • - Eugenol • - Camphorated monoparachlorophenol (CMCP) • - Parachlorophenol (PCP) • - Camphorated parachlorophenol (CPC) • - Metacresylacetate (Cresatin) • - Cresol • - Creosote (Beechwood) • - Thymol • Aldehydes • - Formocresol • - Glutaraldehyde • Halides • - Sodium hypochlorite • - Iodine • - Potassium iodide • Steroids • Calcium hydroxide • Antibiotics • Combinations

  8. According to Grossman • Essential oils • - Eugenol • 2. Phenolic compound • - Phenol • - Para chlorophenol • - Camphorated parachlorophenol • - Formocresol • - Glutaraldehyde • - Cresatin • Halogens • - sodium hypochlorite • - Iodides • 4. Quaternary Ammonium compounds • - 9-amino acridine

  9. INDIVIDUAL INTRACANAL MEDICAMENTS

  10. Physiologic Saline From a biological stand point, sterile normal saline is the best irrigant to use because it causes. • Least apical tissue irritation or damage. • Biocompatible. • Least amount of cell lysis.

  11. Disadvantages: • Does not remove the smear layer. • Flushes out some of the superficial debris from the root canal system. • Has poor antibacterial properties. • However irrigation followed by ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation have been reported to be almost as effective as 0.5 to 2.5% sodium hypochlorite irrigation in reducing the number of bacteria in infected root canals.

  12. Phenol • It is the oldest compound for controlling microorganisms. • It was introduced by Lord Lister in 1867. • It is white crystalline substance, and has a characteristic odor derived from coal tar. • Phenol is a protoplasmic poison and produces necrosis of soft tissues by its ability to penetrate and disrupt the cell wall of bacteria and subsequently the protoplasm. • Liquefied phenol consists of 9 parts of phenol and 1 part water. • Highly effective in 1 to 2% concentration.

  13. Camphorated Phenol • This contains 30% phenol, 60% camphor, 10% ethylalcohol. • It is the least toxic of the phenolic compounds. • It has excellent antimicrobial effect and also relieves pain. • Camphorating process aims at developing a less caustic • medicament as a result of the slow release of phenol. • Camphor serves as a vehicle and diluent.

  14. Monochlorophenol (MCP) • It is a derivative of phenol and has three isomers of which paramonochlorophenol is the most effective. - Mono chlorophenol is more effective antiseptic and is also more toxic than phenol.

  15. Camphorated Paramonochlorophenol (CMPCP) (Developed by Walkhoff 1891) - Contains : 35% monochlorophenol 65% camphor - Its antimicrobial effect is good. - Highly toxic to the tissues. - It is used in the form of vapor forming intracanal medicament. The vapors can pass through the apical foramen.

  16. Formocresol Developed by BUCKLEY in 1906 Contents : 19% formaldehyde 35% cresol 46% water Glycerine. or is a combination of formalin and cresol in the proportion of 1:2 • Formocresol combines the protein - coagulating effect of phenolic compounds with the alkylating effect of formaldehyde. • The bactericidal effect of formocresol is good at levels as low as 2%.

  17. It is a strong poison and causes widespread destruction of living tissue followed by a persistent inflammatory reaction. • Studies have reported that formocresol treated tissue produced a cell mediated immune response.

  18. Glutaraldehyde • It is a colorless slightly soluble in H2O. • Slightly acidic • It is a strong disinfectant and fixative • Used in concentration of 2% - Extent of toxicity is less compared to formaldehyde. Its molecular weight is high compared to formaldehyde hence does not penetrate into the periapical tissues.

  19. Glutaraldehyde was preferred to formaldehyde: • Irreversible bonding with proteins. • Limited diffusion into tooth structure. • No periapical irritation. • Appears to cause a softening of dentin for limited duration, facilitating the mechanical preparation of the root canal. • Greater reduction in microorganisms with glutaraldehyde 2% can be attributed to the fixative property rendering the microorganisms inert and non-toxic.

  20. Cresatin • Also known as metacresylacetate • It is a clear, stable, oily liquid of low volatility. • It has both antiseptic and obtundant properties • Compared to formocresol or camphorated parachlorophenol the antimicrobial effect of cresatin is less

  21. Creosote • It is a mixture of phenol and phenol derivatives • Beachwood creosote has long been used in endodontic therapy. • There are several reports on severe tissue irritation and necrosis

  22. Alcohols • Ethyl alcohol and Isopropyl alcohol are used. • These denature protiens in high concentration. • Denaturing takes place in presence of water, hence 70% is prefered to 95% • They are not recommended as intracanal medicament

  23. Eugenol • It is the chemical essence of oil of clove. • It is related to phenol • It is both an antiseptic and an obtundant • It is slightly more irritating than oil of clove. • Studies have reported that eugenol inhibited intradental nerve impulses • A few reports of allergy to eugenol have been reported.

  24. Heavy metal salts • Salts of silver, copper and mercury are used. • They coagulate protiens and act as enzyme inhibitors. • They are toxic. • The mercury salts are rendered less effective by the tissue fluid proteins present in the root canal. Hence they are not often used.

  25. N2 Contains : Paraformaldehyde Phenylmercuric borate Eugenol. Additional ingredients like lead, corticosteroids, antibiotics. - It is claimed to be both intracanalmedicament and a sealer - Claims that N2 has a permanent disinfectant action and unusual antimicrobial properties have been denied by the council on Dental Therapeutics of the American Dental Association. - The antibacterial effect of N2 is short lived about a week to 10 days.

  26. SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE Is one of the most popular irrigating solutions. It has been used as an irrigant for well over 4 decades. • It was first recommended as an antiseptic solution by HENRY DAKIN in 1915 and was called as DAKIN’s SOLUTION during the time of World War-I (NaOCl buffered with sodium bicarbonate). • 0.5% NaOCl solution was then used as a treatment for infected wounds.

  27. Manufactured: • It is made by bubbling chlorine gas through NaOH to form equal amounts of sodium hypochlorite and sodium chloride (NaOH gas NaOCl + NaCl2)

  28. Properties of NaOCl: • Antibacterial action • Strong dissolution property: Fresh tissue • Necrotic tissue • Fixed tissue • Lubricant – for effective instrumentation. • Bleaching action on discolored teeth. • NaOCl has been used in various concentrations ranging from 0.5-5.25%. • Most commonly used concentration – 2.5%

  29. ACTIONS: Antibacterial: NaOCl exerts its antibacterial action either by: • Direct contact with microorganisms. • Vapour action. Destruction of the bacteria takes place in two phases: • Penetration into the bacterial cell. • Chemical combination with the protoplasm of the bacterial cell that destroys it.

  30. Sodium hypochlorite at 5.25% is an extremely effective antimicrobial agent. • Studies have shown that this solution will destroy most of the microorganisms found in the root-canal system after exposure of 1 minute or less.

  31. FACTORS AFFECTING THE ANTIMICROBIAL PROPERTIES OF NaOCl: • Diluting 5.25% NaOCl inhibits its antimicrobial property significantly. • Bactericidal effectiveness of 5.25% NaOCl decreases over time. Martin suggested a storage shelf-life of 3 months for undiluted preparations. • The antimicrobial property may be achieved in a significantly lesser time by prewarming the solution (room temperature 22°C-body temperature 37°C).

  32. It maintains a remarkable degree of antimicrobial activity in the presence of organic matter such as blood and serum albumin. • ** Briseno (1992) and coworkers demonstrated that the irrigation of the root canal with 1% NaOCl (manual) was more effective against the test organisms (E-edi + S.mutans) than irrigation of the root canal with 2% NaOCl + ultrasound.

  33. TISSUE SOLVENT PROPERTY • NaOCl possesses strong tissue dissolution property for fresh vital tissue, necrotic tissue and fixed tissues. This tissue dissolving capacity equals to that shown by H2SO4 and HCl. • The solvent action of NaOCl has been attributed to its high alkalinity. • The removal of organic tissue by NaOCl is by the release of hypochlorous acid which reacts with insoluble proteins to form soluble polypeptides, aminoacids and other by products.

  34. NaOCl – hypochlorus acid + insoluble proteins – soluble polypeptides, aminoacids and byproducts. • Grossman has shown that it can dissolve an entire pulp in 20 minutes to 2 hours. • 5.25% of NaOCl is capable of penetrating into the dentinal tubules and dissolving the contents of the tubules adjacent to the main canal.

  35. NaOCl and Smear layers NaOCl alone is not very effective in removal of the smear layer, but when used in conjunction with other solutions or with ultrasonics it has shown to remove the smear layer effectively. Yamada and associates (2003) reported that a final flushing of 17% EDTA, followed by 10ml of 5.25% NaOCl, was more effective in removing both inorganic and organic debris. These authors concluded, that flushing with a chelating agent removed the final calcific sludge that remained on the canal walls.

  36. Flushing with 10ml NaOCl removed any remaining organic tissue, thus leaving patent dentinal tubules on the surface of the canal walls. • (Lengiz in 97) showed that the use of 0.5% NaOCl in combination with Ca(OH)2 preparation and ultrasonics in the root canal can effectively remove the smear layer. • Also this is considered to be more safer than the use of NaOCl solution is 5% concentration which is proved to be highly toxic.

  37. TOXICITY OF NaOCl TO PERIAPICAL TISSUE Causes: • Severe pain. • Edema. • Profuse haemorrhage both interstitially and through the tooth. This may be followed by (for several days) • Increasing edema. • Ecchymosis. • Tissue necrosis. • Parasthesia. • Secondary infection (rarely). Majority of cases, have shown complete resolution within a couple of weeks. In some cases they may be long-term parasthesia or scarring.

  38. Treatment • For immediate relief of pain – nerve block and L.A. • Wet, cold, compress – continually applied to the face – for relief of pain and burning sensation and minimize swelling (for upto 6 hours). • Analgesics – after emergency treatment. • To control inflammation – corticosteroids immediately i.v. for 3 days. • To prevent infection – antibiotics (1wk). • Heat packs and warm mouth rinse (after initial treatment). • To improve circulation to the area.

  39. Advise the patient concerning the anticipated swelling and ecchymosis. • Give the patient both verbal and written instructions. • Reassure the patient that he will regain his normal appearance within a short period.

  40. HYDROGEN PEROXIDE 3% H2O2 was recommended as a canal irrigant because of: • Its effervescent action. • Disinfecting properties.

  41. Effervescent action was specially indicated in mandibular teeth where the bubbling of the peroxide was thought to lift debris from the canal system almost defying gravity. • H2O2 does not possess tissue dissolution properties • Not effective as a lubricant. • Hence, alternate use of H2O2 + NaOCl irrigating solutions was recommended by Grossman.

  42. This alternate irrigation regimen during Chemo-mechanical preparation produces: • Transient but energetic effervescence that mechanically forces out debris and microorganisms out of the canal. • At the same time the O2 that is liberated in an active state assists in destroying the anaerobic microorganisms. • The permeability of dentinal tubules is increased allowing deeper penetration of intracanal medicament. • Increases the bleaching action on discolored teeth.

  43. CHELATING AGENTS • Aid in the mechanical enlargement of difficult root canals by softening the root canal dentin walls. • EDTA – Ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid composed by Disodium salt of EDTA distilled water 100ml, 5N NaOH 4.25ml. • This was 1st described for use in endodontics by Ostby.

  44. Functions • It has certain dentin dissolving effects desirable in all kinds of root canal therapy – ease in instrumentation. • It reduced the time necessary for debridement and disinfection. • It aided in enlarging narrow / obstructed canals. • It helped make possible the bypassing of broken instruments in the canals. • Removed the inorganic component of smear layer. • Had no corrosive effects on the instruments.

  45. Action The sodium salts of EDTA are capable of forming soluble non-ionic chelates with large number of metallic ions viz. calcium ions. Because EDTA would seek the calcium metal ion in the hydroxyapatite crystals of dentin in a chelate and thereby act to demineralize dentin and enamel. • Ostby and associates found that EDTA decalcified dentin to a depth of 20-30µm in 5 minutes. • Franklin et al in 2004 reported that it is possible to overchelate a canal which can lead to perforation.

  46. EDTA is known to remain active within the canal for 5 days. • If not inactivated the solution may seep into the periapical tissues and damage the bone. • Therefore at the completion of appointment, the canal must be irrigated with NaOCl.

  47. RC Preparation It’s a combination of 17% EDTA + urea peroxide 10%, developed by Stewart and colleagues. Effective lubricating and cleaning agent. • It allows deeper penetration of the medicament into the dentin. • It is not water-soluble. • It is popularly used in combination with NaOCl. • Because it is thought to produce a bubbling action helps loosen and float out dentinal debris.

  48. Studies have shown RC preparation might affect the apical seal. • Cook and associates in 1998 reported twice as much leakage in canals obturated with GP or silver cones following cleaning and shaping with RC preparation NaOCl than with NaOCl alone.

  49. EDTA-c (commercial name) Quaternary ammonium compound to EDTA +Cetavlon which has greater germicidal acitivity and disinfecting properties. REDTA – A quaternary ammonium bromide + EDTA solution. To reduce the surface tension + increase the permeability of the solution.

  50. SALVIZOL Another chelating agent is salvizol based on aminoquinaldinumdiacetate. Properties: • It has surface acting property similar to quaternary ammonium groups. • Chelating action. • Organic debridement. • Bactericidal activity.

More Related