Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 29

Report to School Committee 2003 MCAS Results October 21, 2003 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 80 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Report to School Committee 2003 MCAS Results October 21, 2003. A New Baseline. New Baseline. Changes in the Testing Program Results by Performance Category for the District and Individual Schools Comparable Communities Next Steps. Changes in Testing Program. No Average Scaled Scores

Download Presentation

Report to School Committee 2003 MCAS Results October 21, 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Report to School Committee2003 MCAS ResultsOctober 21, 2003

A New Baseline


New baseline

New Baseline

Changes in the Testing Program

Results by Performance Category for the District and Individual Schools

Comparable Communities

Next Steps


Changes in testing program

Changes in Testing Program

No Average Scaled Scores

New Testing Requirement for LEP Students

BHS tested 102 LEP students, 81 of whom would have been previously exempt!

EJH tested 148 LEP students, 127 of whomwould have been previously exempt!

There were 164 students in grades 3, 4, & 6 who would have been previously exempt!


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

MCAS Testing Program

High Stakes/High Standards

Grades tested: 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10

Tonight’s focus: English/Language Arts Mathematics


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Performance Categories

Category

Advanced

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Failing/Warning

Score Range

260-280

240-259 [240 = proficient]

220-239 [220 = passing]

200-219


Mcas 2003

MCAS 2003

Changes in Performance Categories by Grade


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Percentage of Students in Warning/Failing Category

ELA MATH

year 98 99 00 01 02 0398 99 00 01 02 03

Grade 3 14 14 15 [13]

State 7 6 7

Grade 4 29 25 22 19 19 18 [15] 39 35 29 27 35 28 [26]

State 15 12 16 11 10 10 23 19 18 19 19 16

Grade 6 46 39 37 [36]

State 33 30 26

Grade 7 24 19 15 [13]

State 12 9 7

Grade 8 69 67 67 48 54 59[57]

State 42 40 39 31 33 33

Grade 10 44 42 42 24 14 19 [14] 76 76 64 35 38 36 [33]

BHS 44 41 41 23 13 18 [13] 75 76 64 34 36 35 [32]State 28 32 34 18 14 12 52 53 45 25 25 21


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Percentage of Students in Advanced /Proficient Category

ELA MATH

year 98 99 00 01 02 0398 99 00 01 02 03

Grade 3 36 42 42 [44]

State 62 67 63

Grade 4 6 8 8 33 32 38 [40] 17 18 23 23 20 22 [23]

State 20 21 49 51 54 55 34 36 40 34 39 40

Grade 6 23 29 27 [27]

State 36 41 42

Grade 7 31 38 36 [37]

State55 6465

Grade 8 14 8 12 18 14 13 [14]

State 31 28 34 34 34 37

Grade 10 22 24 27 42 61 52 [57] 7 9 16 29 27 33 [36]

BHS 22 24 27 43 63 54 [59] 7 9 16 30 29 34 [37]

State 38 34 36 51 59 61 24 24 33 45 44 51


Individual school results

Individual School Results

Changes in Performance Categories


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 3 Percentage of students in warning category

ELA

year01 02 03

Angelo 1319 25 [17]16%

Arnone1821 16 [14]29%

Ashfield 3 9 5

Belmont St. 1311 11 [ 3]18%

Brookfield 7 6 6

Davis2122 16 [14]15%

Downey2216 25

Franklin1011 11

Gilmore1118 16 [12]28%

Hancock 710 10

Huntington11 8 13

Kennedy 810 13 [4]15%

Plouffe2819 5

Raymond 1817 27

Whitman 6 0 5

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 3 Percentage of students in adv/prof category

ELA

year01 02 03

Angelo29 36 37 [43]16%

Arnone34 40 35 [39]29%

Ashfield41 46 45

Belmont St.26 42 51 [61]18%

Brookfield4155 62

Davis2628 38 [40]15%

Downey3347 37

Franklin48 40 57

Gilmore3836 20 [21]28%

Hancock5253 53

Huntington3735 36

Kennedy37 54 46 [52]15%

Plouffe36 33 62

Raymond36 44 28

Whitman29 37 38

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 4 Percentage of students in warning category

ELA MATH

year98 99 00 01 02 0398 99 00 01 02 03

Angelo 6%23 17 15 16 20 11 [9]50 23 25 24 39 19 [17]

Arnone17%43 31 29 14 22 26 [19]53 46 35 2233 32 [30]

Ashfield40 13 18 15 9 14 46 14 16 1527 15

Belmont St. 33%18 31 33 21 22 25 [18]42 42 36 2337 47 [42]

Brookfield26 33 12 18 12 8 34 48 21 27 30 11

Davis 13%36 33 34 28 31 24 [23]53 49 46 53 54 26 [25]

Downey27 30 40 32 37 21 25 43 41 4052 36

Franklin35 35 15 9 13 6 37 49 22 1131 17

Gilmore 22%39 29 26 21 11 42 [35]49 44 26 2627 56 [47]

Hancock19 15 10 7 18 17 14 19 17 1731 25

Huntington24 13 21 14 5 5 27 17 25 22 24 25

Kennedy 24% 9 7 15 18 10 21 [ 9]12 21 26 20 20 27 [16]

Plouffe47 25 18 24 28 9 63 38 28 36 37 28

Raymond27 30 22 24 23 15 48 37 39 3036 32

Whitman22 19 16 24 7 4 63 38 26 3118 8

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 4 Percentage of students in adv/prof category

ELAMATH

year98 99 00 01 02 0398 99 00 01 02 03

Angelo 6% 8 27 18 52 38 54 [56]10 41 42 39 29 40 [41]

Arnone 17%12 9 8 44 39 39 [43]20 12 23 36 27 18 [20]

Ashfield 1 5 5 27 33 40 16 28 16 31 23 26

Belmont St. 33% 3 6 4 30 34 23 [25]16 12 10 13 12 10 [11]

Brookfield 4 2 5 28 19 40 19 7 23 16 13 34

Davis 13% 5 1 3 19 13 31 [32]11 8 10 11 8 14 [14]

Downey 2 4 2 18 12 30 19 10 14 13 11 23

Franklin 0 2 2 40 35 52 6 11 28 35 24 27

Gilmore 22% 8 2 4 15 46 13 [16]18 3 18 8 29 6 [ 8]

Hancock 8 11 10 50 26 36 29 32 29 23 19 20

Huntington 12 7 8 35 40 40 23 25 32 29 24 15

Kennedy 24% 15 15 19 43 54 51 [59]36 27 33 23 32 32 [38]

Plouffe 0 19 13 35 36 40 2 21 26 28 30 25

Raymond 4 3 4 23 26 37 5 10 14 17 17 12

Whitman 0 7 8 26 46 62 13 9 28 21 28 32

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 6 Percentage of students in warning category

MATH

year01 02 03

Angelo 47 40 33 [32] 7%

Arnone 33 30 33 [30]11%

Ashfield 54 48 29

Belmont St. 59 31 45 [41]18%

Brookfield 45 28 32

Davis 7366 52

Downey 46 38 34

Franklin 35 25 26

Gilmore 52 39 53 [49]21%

Hancock 3029 19

Huntington 46 41 44

Kennedy 33 25 40 [31] 16%

Plouffe 54 50 43

Raymond 53 50 42

Whitman 27 29 25

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 6 Percentage of students in adv/prof category

MATH

year01 02 03

Angelo28 39 46 [48] 7%

Arnone3242 39 [43] 11%

Ashfield18 18 21

Belmont St.18 28 14 [16] 18%

Brookfield20 38 17

Davis 5 8 14

Downey22 25 32

Franklin28 50 51

Gilmore10 23 11 [ 9] 21%

Hancock37 30 33

Huntington23 21 15

Kennedy32 52 27 [31] 16%

Plouffe23 25 30

Raymond12 15 21

Whitman27 41 34

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 7 Percentage of students in warning category

ELA

year01 0203

North24 13 7

South26 1813

East23 26 27 [11]20%

West20 1411

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 7 Percentage of students in adv/prof category

ELA

year01 0203

North24 3939

South30 3636

East34 2827 [35]20%

West364843

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 8 Percentage of Students in Warning Category

MATH

year 98 99 00 01 02 03

NJH73 73 63 44 49 54

SJH68 64 6450 54 58

EJH72 69 7152 52 65 [58]21%

WJH63 60 65 41 59 53

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 8 Percentage of Students in Adv/Prof Category

MATH

year 98 99 00 01 02 03

NJH10 5 13 21 17 16

SJH12 11 11 16 13 15

EJH12 6 10 15 12 9 [11]21%

WJH18 10 1522 15 16

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 10 Percentage of Students in Failing Category

ELA

year 98 99 00 01 02 03

BHS 44 41 41 23 13 18 [13] 8%

MATH

year 98 99 00 01 02 03

BHS 75 76 64 34 36 35 [32] 8%

LEP


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Grade 10 Percentage of Students in Adv/Prof Category

ELA

year 98 99 00 01 02 03

BHS 22 24 27 43 63 54 [59] 8%

MATH

year 98 99 00 01 02 03

BHS 7 9 16 30 2934 [37]8%

LEP


Comparable communities

Comparable Communities


Percent of all students in warn fail category

Percent of All Students in Warn/Fail Category

Grade 3 4 7 10 4 6 8 10

ELA ELA ELA ELAMath Math Math Math

Brockton 15 18 15 20 28 37 59 37

Boston 21 28 16 30 38 50 53 36

Chelsea 11 20 17 41 20 43 64 53

Chicopee 10 15 15 15 25 48 51 28

Fall River 8 13 13 24 22 51 68 50

Holyoke 28 36 30 40 42 63 77 55

Lawrence 27 35 25 37 52 64 72 53

Lowell 19 25 15 22 33 51 57 36

Lynn 11 16 10 21 25 37 52 33

New Bedford 9 15 18 27 24 41 62 42

Pittsfield 6 8 13 12 17 49 44 24

Revere 7 15 12 20 19 25 49 32

Springfield 17 22 23 34 34 62 72 53

Taunton 6 9 9 14 13 31 52 27

Worcester 10 14 19 24 21 34 60 38


Percent of all students in adv prof category

Percent of All Students in Adv/Prof Category

Grade 3 4 7 10 4 6 8 10

ELA ELA ELA ELAMath Math Math Math

Brockton 42 38 36 52 22 27 13 33

Boston 32 27 42 36 16 20 21 37

Chelsea 41 34 33 27 32 26 15 21

Chicopee 48 37 47 45 24 17 15 38

Fall River 47 36 40 41 25 15 9 22

Holyoke 26 19 20 28 12 11 4 19

Lawrence 25 20 28 28 10 9 9 18

Lowell 38 29 41 43 21 17 15 34

Lynn 47 38 53 42 25 27 17 32

New Bedford 46 34 30 36 21 20 10 27

Pittsfield 62 47 52 50 27 19 24 41

Revere 49 45 46 49 30 35 25 22

Springfield 42 32 30 30 21 10 7 18

Taunton 61 52 52 51 40 29 22 41

Worcester 49 44 37 38 28 31 15 32


Next steps

Next Steps


Next steps1

Next Steps

Revision of School Improvement Plans

Development of Individual Student Success Plans

Increased professional development in literacy instruction

Professional development in teaching vocabulary

Increased application of classroom assessment


Next steps2

Next Steps

Increased professional development in test-taking strategies

Continued emphasis on Collins Writing Program

Expanded professional development in the instruction of English Language Learners


Next steps3

Next Steps

Increased implementation of standards-based math program

Collegial sharing of best practices


Report to school committee 2003 mcas results october 21 2003

Brockton Public Schools


  • Login