Liberty and justice for all
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 40

Liberty and Justice for All PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 89 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Liberty and Justice for All. What are Civil Rights?. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdTpU5WZHHM What does this speech mean to you?. Issues in the News. Page 355: How does this issue compare to Dr. King’s Speech?

Download Presentation

Liberty and Justice for All

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Liberty and justice for all

Liberty and Justice for All


What are civil rights

What are Civil Rights?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdTpU5WZHHM

What does this speech mean to you?


Issues in the news

Issues in the News

Page 355: How does this issue compare to Dr. King’s Speech?

They both deal with Human Rights or Fundamental Freedoms which lie at the heart of the American Political System


What are some of these rights

What are some of these rights?

To speak freely?

To read and write what they choose?

To worship as they wish?


Quick review

Quick Review

  • We know that the Constitution guarantees these rights.

  • We also knows that it protects these rights.

    • But who protects these rights?


Liberty and justice for all

  • “Liberty lies in the heart of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it; no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it.”

    • What does this quote mean to you?


We are responsible

We are Responsible

As Citizens we share a common faith in the power we have to steer our government.

If we do not carry out our responsibilities then the whole society suffers.


The bill of rights

The Bill of Rights

As we know is our greatest protector of our Civil Rights and Liberties

“Congress shall make no law”

Did it apply to the states?


Not at first

Not at first?

Barron Vs. Baltimore 1833

John Marshall

  • “The first ten amendments contain no expression indicating an intention to apply them to the state government.”


The 14 th amendment

The 14th Amendment

Paved the way for a major expansion of Individual rights

It defined Citizenship: A person born or naturalized in the United States is a citizen of the nation and the state of residence

However, it also made individual rights: national rights: Page 356 (Open your Books)


Incorporation

Incorporation

Definition: The process by which the Bill of Rights was extended to the states and localities

Why is it important?


The answer

The Answer

If it was not incorporated states could possibly deny certain rights to certain citizens of that state.

Example: The Poll Tax

As a result of incorporation the Bill of Rights has become the final safeguard when personal rights are affected


This does create controversy

This does create controversy

http://www.glencoe.com/video_library/index_with_mods.php?PROGRAM=9780078747625&VIDEO=2239&CHAPTER=13&MODE=2


Freedom of religion

Freedom Of Religion

  • What does this issue in the news tell you?

  • No matter how you feel you cannot deny that religion plays or has played a significant part of American Life

  • Over 90% of Americans identify with a religion

    • And Religious Freedom is guaranteed in the 1st Amendment


So why can t we pray here today

So why can’t we pray here today?

  • In order to understand that we have to understand the two clauses of the 1st Amendment

  • The Establishment Clause

    • “States that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”

  • The Free Exercise Clause

    • “Prohibits government from unduly interfering with the free exercise of religion.”


The establishment clause

The Establishment Clause

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/rel_liberty/publiclife/overview.aspx

Page 358

“Wall of Separation”


Religion is everywhere

Religion is Everywhere

Government Officials take their oaths of office in the name of God.

Since 1864 most of the nation’s coins carry the motto “In God we Trust”

Pledge of Allegiance: “one nation under God”

Public meetings including daily sessions of congress open with a prayer

Does Government encourage religion?


Liberty and justice for all

Chaplains serve with the army.

Church property and contributions to religious groups are taxed exempt

You can see how this leads to controversy

And who is supposed to solve this controversy?


The supreme court

The Supreme Court

  • First Establishment Clause case did not come about until 1947 when it decided

  • Everson vs. Board of Education

  • State Aid to Parochial Schools, should the federal government give aid to these schools?

    • 359-360: Read Carefully, What is the Lemon Test? 3 parts


The free exercise clause

The Free Exercise Clause

Religious Practice may be limited

For example in Reynolds v. United States: George Reynolds, Polygamy case

Oregon vs. Smith: Worker was denied unemployment benefits since he was fired for using drugs as part of a religious ceremony

Wisconsin vs. Yoder: Court upheld religious practices by saying Amish parents did not have to send their children to school past 8th grade, since it violated Amish religious beliefs


Religious expression and the flag

Religious Expression and the Flag

Should you have to salute the flag?

In 1936 William Gobitis was expelled from school for not saluting the flag- It was against his religious beliefs, so should he have to salute the flag

Court said the school was correct- Saluting the flag did not infringe on religious freedom

Page 364


Websites to use

Websites to Use:

www.oyez.org

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/rel_liberty/publiclife/overview.aspx

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/

http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/supreme_court/supreme_court.cfm


Freedom of speech

Freedom of Speech

  • Open your books and carefully read on page 366 The Issue in The News and The First Paragraph before Types of Speech

  • What do you think?

    • Should the First Amendment protect the expression of unpopular ideas?


Let s define the word speech

Let’s define the word “Speech”:

How many of you would agree with the following:

Giving a Speech that to the student body at a student assembly .

What about wearing black armbands to protest a war?

Or protesting a law at the Capitol

Are these all speech?


Two categories

Two Categories

1. Pure Speech: The Verbal Expression of thought and opinion before an audience that has chosen to listen

This type of speech has traditionally been powerfully protected by the Supreme Court

2. Symbolic Speech: Sometimes called expressive conduct-involves the use of actions and symbols in addition to or instead of words to express opinions


How does the court decide these symbolic test cases

How does the Court Decide these symbolic test cases?

They have developed a three part test; which they established in United States v. O’Brien

Falls within the Constitutional Power of Government

Narrowly Drawn: So government cannot use it further regulate speech

Leaves other Communication Outlets


Are there other restraints

Are there other restraints?

Yes, and there have to be: For example seditious speech: Which is speech urging resistance to lawful authority or advocating the overthrow of government

But the challenge for the court is when to end these restraints


Clear and present danger 1919

Clear and Present Danger 1919

Page 368

When speech in question clearly presents an immediate danger, the First Amendment does not protect it


The bad tendency doctrine 1925

The Bad Tendency Doctrine 1925

Speech could be restricted even if it had only a tendency to lead to illegal action.

This is not often used

But some Americans think that societies need for order justifies any damage to basic freedoms


The preferred position doctrine

The Preferred Position Doctrine

First Amendment comes first, above all others

Any law limiting these freedoms should be found unconstitutional unless it is absolutely necessary.

Sedition Laws: 369


Defamatory speech

Defamatory speech

This kind of speech is not protected: This is speech that is either untrue or hurtful:

Slander: Spoken

Libel: Written

However, public officials are held to a different standard

Hustler Magazine vs. Farewell: sets up the standard that celebrities and politicians cannot sue for Defamatory speech


Fighting words

Fighting Words

Some words are so offensive that they are deemed as unprotected speech

Chaplinskyv. New Hampshire (1942): Some words incite fighting, which is a breech of the peace and therefore are not protected.


Right to assemble

Right to Assemble

“the right to peacefully assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”

Without this Freedom, no political parties and no special interest groups could exist to influence the actions of government

Dejongev. Oregon 1937


Dejonge vs oregon

DeJonge Vs. Oregon

Established two legal principles

1. Assembly is as important as the rights of free speech and free press

2. Due Process Clause Applies to Freedom of Assembly


Are there limits on demonstrations

Are there limits on demonstrations?

Yes, if there is any potential of violence- example KKK parade then perhaps the Court would rule in favor of a state not allowing the parade

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYh8MOnAgv8

To ensure public order and safety, many states require permits- so streets will not be blocked- Cox. V. New Hampshire


Other limits on public assembly

Other Limits on Public Assembly

Pg. 377

Adderlyv. Florida=

Cox v. Louisiana=

Graynedv. City of Rockford=

Freedom of Assembly does not apply to Private Property


Assembly and disorder

Assembly and Disorder

This is when this Principle gets difficult

The Big Three

Stokie Case

Feiner vs. New York

Gregory vs. City of Chicago


Are you allowed to picket

Are you allowed to Picket?

Not until 1940 in Thornhill vs. Alabama did the Supreme Court Rule that peaceful Picketing was a form of Free Speech

But since this case the court has begun to limit picketing


Freedom of association

Freedom of Association

Can you join an organization that the government considers to be subversive?

In DeJongev. Oregon (1937) the Supreme Court extended the right to freely assemble

Whitney Vs. California (1927)

Dennis Vs. United States (1951)


  • Login