the icf model and survey instruments
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
The ICF model and survey-instruments

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 11

The ICF model and survey-instruments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 155 Views
  • Uploaded on

The ICF model and survey-instruments. Niels Kr. Rasmussen National Institute of Public Health, Denmark. Is the ICF-classification useful for classification of survey-instruments and survey based indicators or Are traditional surveys useful for measurements within the ICF framework.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' The ICF model and survey-instruments' - hillary-petty


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
the icf model and survey instruments

The ICF model and survey-instruments

Niels Kr. Rasmussen

National Institute of Public Health, Denmark

Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

slide2
Is the ICF-classification useful for classification of survey-instruments and survey based indicators
    • or
  • Are traditional surveys useful for measurements within the ICF framework

Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

disability measures in european his
Disability measures in European HIS
  • Background: many approaches to and developments of general/holistic and specific measures of disability in European countries, both in special disability surveys and in multipurpose and HIS surveys, often based on the old OECD concepts and recommendations

Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

slide4
Recent inventories
    • HIS/HES database developed within the HMP
    • Survey data on disability, Eurostat working paper
    • Updated summary inventory
  • Identification of app. 50 surveys measuring various aspects of disability from all EU-member states and some European

Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

classifications used in inventories
Classifications used in inventories
  • Ad hoc, not theory-driven
  • What is it possible to expect respondents to respond to
    • Chronic or acute health problems,
    • Restriction of daily activities/general
    • Restriction in daily activities/specific
    • Participation in work and other
    • Access

Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

global disability screening measures
Global disability screening measures
  • Limitation in daily activities (usually during a two week period
  • Longstanding illness (limiting)
    • In most surveys

Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

comparability 1
Comparability (1)
  • Activity limitation/general
    • 5 out of 14 surveys
  • Activity limitation/specific:
    • Mobility, sensory, self-care

Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

comparability 2
Comparability (2)
  • Different wording of questions or translations
  • Different recall periods
  • Differents domains and activities
  • Different qualifiers and scales

Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

what is the correspondance between eu surveys and icf
What is the correspondance between EU-surveys and ICF?
  • Body functions and structures
  • Health conditions or diseases
  • Activities
  • Participation
  • Environmental factors
  • Personal factors

Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

problems in operationalising complex concepts for survey purposes
Problems in operationalising complex concepts for survey purposes
  • How to translate complex concepts into everyday language
  • Distinquishing between performance and capacity
  • Selfreporting of stigmatised matters
  • Selfreporting of surroundings and contexts and the barriers, effects etc on the individual
  • Validity, transcultural problems etc.

Washington City Group on Disability Statistics

ad