1 / 19

TEACHING CONTEMPORARY COSMOPOLITANISM

TEACHING CONTEMPORARY COSMOPOLITANISM. KRISTIAN SHAW AHRC FUNDED PhD STUDENT KEELE UNIVERSITY. “the real division in literature now is between a literature which acknowledges interdependence and a literature which closes down and denies interdependence” - Richard Powers.

hilde
Download Presentation

TEACHING CONTEMPORARY COSMOPOLITANISM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TEACHING CONTEMPORARY COSMOPOLITANISM KRISTIAN SHAW AHRC FUNDED PhD STUDENT KEELE UNIVERSITY

  2. “the real division in literature now is between a literature which acknowledges interdependence and a literature which closes down and denies interdependence” - Richard Powers

  3. WHAT IS COSMOPOLITANISM? • Derives from Greek (i.e. Κόσμος + πολίτης) meaning “world citizenry” • Developed by the Cynics and re-emerged in the Enlightenment • Universal community • Shared citizenship • Promotion of ethical values • Appreciation of heterogeneity and diversity • Interconnection of people and places

  4. WEAKNESSES OF COSMOPOLITANISM • NORMATIVISM – Promotes an unrealistic, utopian world. • UNIVERSALISM – Ignores the ‘local’ and leads to homogeneity • CURRENT MODULES IN HIGHER EDUCATION – Discuss cosmopolitanism from an outdated/ OR postcolonial standpoint

  5. WHAT IS CONTEMPORARY COSMOPOLITANISM? • Catalysts include: - globalisation - transnationalism - digital communicative technology • Forward-thinking • “a skeptical, disillusioned, self-critical outlook”- Ulrich Beck

  6. C21 RELEVANCE • HOW can we understand this concept in the C21? • HOW can cosmopolitanism be applied to global communities and digital networks? • HOW does this manifest itself in literature • WHY is it relevant to C21 teaching inArts and Humanities?

  7. DAVID MITCHELLGlobal Networks/ Global Futures

  8. DAVID MITCHELL Global Networks/Global Futures • “links become more apparent [...] A button can be pushed in Hong Kong and a factory gets closed in Sydney” – David Mitchell

  9. DAVID MITCHELLGlobal Networks/ Global Futures • Increasing transnational mobility • Ethical choices as the basis for a future utopia or dystopia • Cosmopolitan ideals emerge amidst global anxieties

  10. ZADIE SMITHGlocalising London

  11. ZADIE SMITHGlocalising London • “There can be no cosmopolitans without locals” – Ulf Hannerz • London as a microcosm for the global world • Promoting a future imperfect - built upon heterogeneity and discord

  12. DOUGLAS COUPLANDVirtual Communities/ Digital Futures

  13. DOUGLAS COUPLANDVirtual Communities/ Digital Futures • Now over 7 billion people on the planet -52% under the age of 30 (US Census Bureau 2010) • Over 2 billion people using the internet

  14. PHILIP PULLMANCosmological Cosmopolitanism

  15. PHILIP PULLMANCosmological Cosmopolitanism • Extension of the cosmopolitan framework • The “infinite cosmos, uncharted and without territorial borders, serves as an ideal trope for cosmopolitanism’s capacity to dismantle divisions” - Fiona McCulloch • Dissonance becomes the means by which to achieve harmony

  16. WHY IS CONTEMPORARY COSMOPOLITANISM RELEVANT TO C21 ARTS & HUMANITIES? • REACTIVE – real-world applicability and involves active engagement with the C21 • INTERDISCIPLINARY – C21 themes widely discussed in sociology, anthropology, television and film

  17. WORKS CITED – PRIMARY TEXTS • Coupland, Douglas. Generation A. Toronto: Random House, 2009. • ---. Player One: What is to Become of Us? Toronto: House of Anansi Press, 2010. • David Mitchell. Cloud Atlas. London: Sceptre, 2004. • ---. Ghostwhitten. London: Hoddor and Stoughton, 1999. • Pullman, Philip. His Dark Materials. Scholastic: London, 2000. • Smith, Zadie. NW. London: Hamish Hamilton, 2012. • ---. White Teeth. London: Hamish Hamilton, 2000.

  18. WORKS CITED – SECONDARY TEXTS • Appiah, Kwame. Anthony. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2006. • Ball, John Clement. Imagining London: Postcolonial Fiction and the Transnational Metropolis. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2004. • Beck, Ulrich. Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity, 2006. • Bentley, Nick. Ed. British Fiction of the 1990s. New York: Routledge, 2005. • Boxall, Peter. Twenty-First Century Fiction. New York: Cambridge UP, 2013. • Hannerz, Ulf. “Cosmopoltians and Locals in World Culture.” Theory Culture & Society (1990) 7: 237. • Juris, Jeffrey S. “The New Digital Media and Activist Networking within Anti-Corporate Globalization Movements.” In Xavier Inda and Renato Rosaldo. Eds. The Anthropology of Globalization: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008. • McCulloch, Fiona. Cosmopolitanism in Contemporary British Fiction. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

  19. WORKS CITED – SECONDARY TEXTS • Mitchell, David. The Thousand Styles of David Mitchell:In Conversation with Geordie Williamson. The Sydney Writers’ Festival, 2011. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOCTiCfWTUA • Pullman, Philip. “The Republic of Heaven.” Horn Book Magazine (2001): n.pag. Web, 2 May 2013. http://republicofheaven.wordpress.com • Rabinow, Paul. “Representations Are Social Facts.” In James Clifford and George E. Marcus. Eds. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: U of California P, 1986. • Spencer, Robert. Cosmopolitan Criticism and Postcolonial Literature. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. • Schoene, Berthold. The Cosmopolitan Novel. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009. • Walkowitz, Rebecca L. Cosmopolitan Style: Modernism Beyond the Nation. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.

More Related