1 / 72

Introduction to Philosophy

Introduction to Philosophy. PART TWO: Philosophy & Religion. The Problem of Faith & Reason. Early Christian Thought Greeks Jewish Tradition Cause of the problem Two sources: faith & reason Classic Questions Points of Disagreement Points of Agreement Biblical tradition: anti-philosophy

hidi
Download Presentation

Introduction to Philosophy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to Philosophy PART TWO: Philosophy & Religion

  2. The Problem of Faith & Reason • Early Christian Thought • Greeks • Jewish Tradition • Cause of the problem • Two sources: faith & reason • Classic Questions • Points of Disagreement • Points of Agreement • Biblical tradition: anti-philosophy • Biblical tradition: pro-philosophy

  3. The Problem of Faith & Reason • 11th & 12th Century • Introduction • Reason as predominant • John Scotus Erigena • Roscelin • Abelard • Faith as predominant • Monastic reforms • Peter Damian • St. Bernard • Anselm’s View • Reason & Faith • Proof through deduction • Synthesis of faith & reason-Aquinas • Theology & philosophy

  4. The Nature & Existence of God • Questions • Metaphysical questions • What is the nature of God? • Does God exist? • Epistemic Questions • How do we know the nature of God? • How do we know God exists? • Reason & Logic • View • A priori reasoning and God • A Priori Reasoning • St. Anselm, Descartes, Leibniz • A posteriori reasoning and God • A posteriori reasoning • St. Aquinas, David Hume

  5. The Nature & Existence of God • Rejection of Reason & Logic • View • Approaches • God can be known through faith. • God can be known through mystical experience/divine revelation. • God cannot be known by any means. • Pascal’s Wager

  6. Regresses & Absurdity • Regress & Absurdity Methodology • Introduction • Circular Regress • Defined • Form & Examples • A requires A • A requires B, B requires C…Z requires A • Job-Experience • Infinite Regress • Defined • Form • 1 requires 2 • 2 requires 3 • 3 requires 4 • X requires X+1

  7. Regresses & Absurdity • The Evil Bureaucrat • Reductio Ad Absurdum (Reducing to Absurdity) • Defined • Form #1 • Assume P is true. • Prove that assuming P leads to something false, absurd or contradictory. • Conclude that P is false. • Form #2 • Assume P is false. • Prove that assuming P is false leads to something false, absurd or contradictory. • Conclude that P is true. • Example

  8. Regresses & Absurdity • Example • Using a regress in a Reductio Ad Absurdum • Introduction • Example

  9. St. Anselm • Background • Background (1033-1109) • Goal

  10. St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument • Anselm’s A Priori Argument for God’s Existence • The fool understands • “God”: a being than which nothing can be conceived (NGCBC). • Fool says there is no God. • The understands what he hears. • What he understands is in his understanding. • It is one thing for an object to be in the understanding. • It is another to understand the object exists. • Painter analogy • The fool is convinced something exists in his understanding. • From Understanding to Reality • Whatever is understood is in the understanding. • That than which NGCBC cannot exist in the understanding alone. • If NGCBC exists in the understanding alone, it is something GCBC.

  11. St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument • Suppose it exists only in the understanding-it can be conceived to exist in reality, which is greater. • If NGCBC exists in the understanding alone it is GCBC. • This is impossible. • There exists NGCBC in reality & understanding. • God cannot be conceived not to exist • NGCBC exists so truly it cannot be conceived not to exist. • It is possible to conceive of a being that which cannot be conceived not to exist and this is greater than one that can be conceived not to exist. • If NGCBC can be conceived not to exist, it is not NGCBC. • This is a contradiction. • There is so truly a NGCBC that it cannot even be conceived not to exist.

  12. St. Anselm’s Ontological Argument • God alone cannot be conceived not to exist • God exists and cannot be conceived not to exist. • If one could conceive of a being better than God, the creature would rise above its creator, which is absurd. • Everything, except God, can be conceived not to exist. • God alone exists more truly than all others and hence in a higher degree. • Whatever else exists does not exist so truly so it exists to a lesser degree. • So the fool denies God because he is a fool.

  13. Gaunilo’s Answer to the Argument of Anselm • Challenge & Doubt • Gaunilo’s Challenge • Suppose it is said a being which cannot be even conceived in terms of any fact, is in the understanding. • Gaunilo accepts that this being is in his understanding. • He will not accept that it has a real existence until a proof is given. • Gaunilo’s Doubt • Anselm claims this being exists-otherwise the being which is greater than all will not be greater than all. • Gaunilo doubts that this being is greater than any real object. • The only existence it has is the same as when the mind, from a word heard, tries to form the image of an unknown object.

  14. Gaunilo’s Answer to the Argument of Anselm • How is the existence of that being proved from the assumption that it is greater than all other beings? • He does not admit that this being is in his understanding even in the way which many objects whose real existence is uncertain and doubtful, are in his understanding. • It should be proved first that this being really exists. • Then, from the fact that it is greater than all, we would conclude it also subsists in itself.

  15. Gaunilo’s Answer to the Argument of Anselm • Gaunilo’s Perfect Island Argument • The Perfect Island • There is an island that is impossible to find, the “lost” island. • This island has inestimable wealth and no owner or inhabitant. • Hence it is more excellent than all other countries, which are inhabited. • If someone claims there is such an island, Gaunilo would understand his words. • The parity of reasoning: But suppose he said: • You cannot doubt that this most excellent of island exists somewhere. • You have no doubt that it is in your understanding. • It is more excellent not to be in the understanding alone, but to exist in the understanding and in reality. • Hence, the island must exist. • If it does not exist, any land which really exists will be more excellent. • Hence, the island understood to be more excellent will not be more excellent.

  16. Gaunilo’s Answer to the Argument of Anselm • Gaunilo’s Criticism of this line of reasoning. • If someone tried to persuade him by such reasoning, he would assume the person was jesting or regard him or himself a fool. • It ought to be shown that: • The hypothetical excellence of this island exists as a real and indubitable fact. • It is not an unreal object, or one whose existence is uncertain in Gaunilo’s understanding. • A note of Gaunilo’s method. • He is combining parity of reasoning with a reduction to absurdity. • Parity of reasoning: to use reasoning that parallels the reasoning in question. • In this case Gaunilo is using the same line of reasoning as Anselm. • Reducing to absurdity: to prove that a claim is implausible by drawing an absurd or contradictory conclusion from it. • In this case Gaunilo draws an absurd conclusion by using Anselm’s method. • He thus concludes that the method is flawed.

  17. Anselm’s Reply to Gaunilo • The Island • Anselm’s Summary of Gaunilo’s Objection • One should suppose an island in the ocean, which surpasses all lands in its fertility. • Because of the impossibility of discovering what does not exist is called a lost island. • There can be no doubt that this island truly exists in reality. • Hence one who hears it described understands what he hears. • Anselm’s Challenge • If any shall devise anything existing in reality or in concept alone (except that than which a greater cannot be conceived) to which he can apply Anselm’s reasoning, he will discover it.

  18. Anselm’s Reply to Gaunilo • Anselm’s Reply • Part one: God cannot be conceived not to be. • This being than which a greater is inconceivable cannot be conceived not to be. • Because it exists on so assured a ground of truth. • Otherwise it would not exist at all. • Part Two: The dilemma • So, if one claims he conceives this being not to exist, at the time when he conceives of this either he conceives of a being than which a greater is inconceivable or he does not conceive at all. • If he does not conceive, he does not conceive of the nonexistence of that of which he does not conceive. • If he conceives, he certainly conceives of a being which cannot be even conceived not to exist. • If it could be conceived not to exist, it could be conceived to have a beginning and an end. • This impossible.

  19. Anselm’s Reply to Gaunilo • Part Three: It’s inconceivable. • He who conceives of this being conceives of a being which cannot be even conceived not to exist. • But he who conceives of this being does not conceive that it does not exist. • If he does so, then he conceives what is inconceivable. • The nonexistence of that than which a greater cannot be conceived is inconceivable.

  20. St. Thomas Aquinas • Background (1224-1274) • Early Life • Son of the count of Aquino • Imprisoned in a tower • Albert the Great • Eastern Orthodox Church • Mystic Experience • Canonized in 1323 • 1879 Pope Leo XIII • The Ox • Nickname • The flying Cow • Works • 25 Volumes • Summa Theologica

  21. St. Thomas Aquinas • Aristotle & Aquinas • Complete Works • 12th-13th Century: the complete works of Aristotle became available in Europe. • Aristotle’s works presented a systematic and developed philosophy. • Conflict • Aristotle: the world is eternal and uncreated. • Apparently did not accept personal immortality. • Ibn Rushd’s commentaries on Aristotle • Neo-Platonism • Aquinas’ View • Aristotle’s view could be adopted without heresy. • Regarded Aristotle as a rich intellectual behavior. • “The Philosopher.” • Aristotle as a pagan lacking divine revelation.

  22. St. Thomas Aquinas • Shift from Plato to Aristotle • Platonic notions of the eternal & other worldliness. • Aristotle’s works presented a systematic and developed philosophy. • Faith & Reason • Reconciliation: Augustine • Sin damaged reason • Grace • Faith as necessary condition for philosophical understanding • Reconciliation: Aquinas • Sin did not criple our rational facilities • Reason as autonomous source of knowledge • Distinguishes between philosophy & theology • Two sources of knowledge • Theology yields knowledge via faith & revelation • Philosophy yield knowledge via reason and experience

  23. St. Thomas Aquinas • Truth: Christian teachings that a matter of faith • Known via revelation • Beyond reason, not contrary to reason • Objections and problems • Cannot be proven/disproven by reason • Examples: trinity, incarnation, original sin, etc. • Truth: Empirical Knowledge & Self Evident Philosophical Principles • Not known via revelation • Examples: Aristotle’s logic, biological functions of heart • Truth: Overlap of philosophy & theology • Known via revelation or reason • Examples: God’s existence & qualities, existence of the soul, immortality, natural moral law • Two Type of Theology • Revealed supernatural • Natural theology • Conflict

  24. St. Thomas Aquinas • Aquinas’ Epistemology & Metaphysics • Epistemology • Aristotle’s Influence • Blank slate • No innate knowledge • Senses provide reason with content • Intellect • Intellect • Passive & active • Passive operations • Objects of experience • Active aspect • Potential • Natural process

  25. St. Thomas Aquinas • Metaphysics: Hierarchy • Actuality & Potentiality • Prime matter-potentiality • Forms-actuality • God-pure actuality • Change • Great Chain of Being • Hierarchy • Variety • Angels • Knowable • Purpose • Objective Values

  26. St. Thomas Aquinas • Metaphysics: Existence & Essence • Essence & Existence • Essence • Existence • God • His essence entails He exists • God • Necessity • Rejection of ontological argument • Empirical experience

  27. St. Thomas Aquinas: Five Ways • Introduction • Introduction • Aristotle • General Form • If the world has X, then God exists. • The world has X. • God exists. • Cosmological argument • Assumption: infinite regress of causes is not possible

  28. St. Thomas Aquinas: Five Ways • The First Way (the Way of Motion) • Some things are in motion • Whatever is moved is moved by another • Potentiality • A thing moves • Reduction from potentiality to actuality • Fire • Actuality & potentiality in different respects • Hot • Cold • Impossible to be both moved and mover. • Whatever is moved is moved by another • Moved by another

  29. St. Thomas Aquinas: Five Ways • Moved by another • This cannot go on to infinity • No first mover • No other mover • Moved by first mover • Staff • First mover • This everyone understands to be God

  30. St. Thomas Aquinas: Five Ways • The Second Way ( Efficient Cause) • Order of efficient causes • Nothing can be the efficient cause of itself • Not possible to go on to infinity • Efficient causes following an order • First • Intermediate • Take away the cause • If no first cause, then neither intermediate nor ultimate • If it is possible to go on to infinity • No first efficient cause • No ultimate effect • No immediate efficient causes • Plainly false • First efficient cause to which everyone gives the name God.

  31. St. Thomas Aquinas: Five Ways • The Third Way (Possibility & Necessity) • Possible to be and not to be • Impossible for these to always exist • One time there was nothing • Nothing would exist now • Impossible for anything to have begun to exist • Thus now nothing would be in existence • There must exist something whose existence is necessary • Every necessary thing either has its necessity cause by another or not • Impossible to go on to infinity • As per efficient causes • Therefore we must admit the existence of a being • Having of itself its own necessity • Not receiving it from another • Causing necessity in others • This all men speak of as God

  32. St. Thomas Aquinas: Five Ways • The Fourth Way (Gradation) • Among beings are some more and some less • More or less are predicated by resemblance to a maximum • There is something truest, best, noblest • There is something most in being • The maximum in any genus is the cause of all in that genus • Fire • There must be something which is the cause of being, goodness, perfection • This being we call God

  33. St. Thomas Aquinas: Five Ways • The Fifth Way (Governance of the World) • Things that act from knowledge act for an end • Evident from acting in the same way • Whatever lacks knowledge must be directed • Therefore some intelligent being directs all natural things • This being we call God

  34. St. Thomas Aquinas: Five Ways • Common Mistakes in Interpreting the 5 Ways • Everything must have a cause • Does not assume this • What is potential must be cause by what is actual • Created beings • The world has a beginning in time • Does not attempt to prove this • Does not disprove • Aristotle’s eternal world and unmoved mover • Possibility of an eternal universe • First cause • Eternal flame • God as a continuously sustaining cause • Not possible to prove an eternal world • St. Bonaventure • Beginning in time • Revelation, not proof

  35. St. Thomas Aquinas: Five Ways • Common Criticisms • Five beings • Five different beings • Being distinguished by qualities • Perfect and unlimited being • Two perfect beings would be identical • Cannot be two unlimited beings • “And this everyone understands to be God” • Different from the personal God • Not a complete view of God • Important qualities • Way of gradation

  36. Gottfried Leibniz • Background • German Culture • Stagnant • Languages • Reformation & 30 Years Way (1618-1648) • No other significant thinkers • Background for Leibniz • Early Years • Professional career • Diplomacy • Works • Logical Method

  37. Leibniz: Arguments for God • God • Proofs for God’s Existence • Ontological argument • Eternal & necessary truths • Design argument • Cosmological argument • Proof of God’s Existence for God’s Existence • God • Supreme substance • Unique, universal, necessary • Nothing else independent • Incapable of limits, as much reality as possible. • Perfection • God is absolutely perfect • Perfections from God, imperfections from their own nature

  38. Leibniz: Arguments for God • Existence • God is the source • Existence of a necessary being • God alone must exist if he is possible

  39. Leibniz: Arguments for God • The Cosmological Argument • Two principles on which reasons are founded • Contradiction • False • True • Sufficient reason • Reason why it is so • Known • Two kinds of truth • Those of reasoning • Necessary • Analysis • Those of fact • Contingent • Possible

  40. Leibniz: Arguments for God • Sufficient Reason • Contingent truths • Resolution • Contingents • Sufficient/final reason • God • Necessary substance • Change exists eminently • God suffices

  41. Leibniz: Problem of Evil • Best of All Possible Worlds • The best world • “best of all possible worlds” • Single event • Entirety • God’s choice • God’s Choice • Infinity of possible universes • Reason • Best • Wisdom • Goodness • Power • Diversity • Only God is perfect • God must pick the best • Variety & order

  42. Leibniz: Problem of Evil • No Better World Possible • Intellectualist view • God’s will • The problem and reply • God lacks goodness • Defects • Big picture • Not made for us alone • The Best • Impossible • Reply • Denial of Pantheism • Infinite divisibility • Infinity is not a whole • God • Universe is not an animal or substance

  43. Leibniz: Problem of Evil • Evil as Privation • Whence does evil come? • Origin of Evil-Ancients • Matter • Uncreated • Origin of Evil-intellectualist view • Eternal verities • Original imperfection • Errors • Understanding & Necessity • Plato • God & Nature • Understanding • Necessity • Understanding • Primitive Form • Ideal Cause • Formal cause • Evil is deficient

  44. Leibniz: Problem of Evil • The Analogy of the Boat • Boats • Cargo • Slower • Receptivity • Slower • The Analogy • Current is like God • Inertia is like imperfection • Slowness is like defects • Current causes motion not retardation • God causes perfection • Limitation in receptivity • God causes the material element of evil not the formal • Current is the material cause of retardation but not the formal • It causes the speed but not the limit • God and sin • Defects • God produces all that is positive, good and perfect • Imperfections arise from the original limitations • God cannot give all • Degrees of perfection

  45. David Hume • Background (1711-1776) • Life & Philosophical Writings • Born 1711 • Edinburgh University • France • Works • A Treatise of Human Nature • An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding • An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals • Natural History of Religion • Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion • History of England • Died 1776 (still dead today)

  46. Hume’s Philosophy of Religion: Existence of God • Skepticism • Introduction • Skeptical • A priori & a posteriori arguments fail • Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion • Cleanthes: a posteriori arguments • Demea: faith & a priori arguments • Philo: skeptic • All arguments for God fail • First cause arguments • Reason • Matters of fact • Existence • A priori reasoning • Conceiving • Demonstrable • Relations of ideas

  47. Hume’s Philosophy of Religion: Existence of God • Causation • Assumption • Causality as habit • House analogy • Universe • No constant conjunction • No empirical argument based on causation • Rejection of Design • Mechanistic assumption • Resembles animal/vegetable more than a machine • Matching environment • Ideally suited

  48. Hume’s Philosophy of Religion: Existence of God • Five Problems • Introduction • Like effects • First Problem • Finite effect • Cause as great as the effect • Second Problem • Perfect • Perfect universe • Falls short • No other universes • Third Problem • As good as possible • Many worlds • Labor lost • Slow improvement

  49. Hume’s Philosophy of Religion: Existence of God • Fourth Problem • One God • Analogy • Fifth • God as physical being

  50. Hume’s Problem of Evil • Establishing the Misery • Philo-Feeling • Misery • Eloquence • Feel it more • Demea-Truth • Truth • Miseries • Cannot be doubted • Philo-Agreement • Learned • Poets • Demea-Writers & Misery • All complain • Philo-Leibniz • Denied

More Related