1 / 115

What is Psychology? education-portal/what-is-psychology.html Why Psychology?

Research Methods: Thinking Critically with Psychological Science ..Critical Thinking and History of PsychA Brief History of Psychology by Johanna Evenson.flv. What is Psychology? education-portal/what-is-psychology.html Why Psychology?.

hide
Download Presentation

What is Psychology? education-portal/what-is-psychology.html Why Psychology?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Research Methods: Thinking Critically with Psychological Science..\Critical Thinking and History of Psych\A Brief History of Psychology by Johanna Evenson.flv

  2. What is Psychology? education-portal/what-is-psychology.htmlWhy Psychology? To satisfy one’s curiosity about people & to remedy one’s own woes?

  3. The Need for Psychology as a SCIENCE How can we separate uniformed opinions from examined conclusions? Why isn’t intuition enough? we focus on the times we were right & ignore the times we were wrong Anecdotes vs. examined conclusion portalpsychology-is-a-science

  4. Did We Know It All Along? Hindsight Bias • Hindsight Biasthe tendency to believe, after learning an outcome, that one would have foreseen it. • Also known as the “I knew it all along” phenomenon. • “Out of sight, out of mind” • “Absence makes the heart grow fonder” • ..\Critical Thinking and History of Psych\An Introduction to Psychology - Part 1.flv

  5. Overconfidence • Overconfidence • Together with hindsight bias, can lead to overestimate our intuition Flaws in these aspects of thinking fuel the need for SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY- fed by curious skepticism & by humility, can help us sift reality from illusion

  6. The Scientific Attitude • Three main components • Curious eagerness • Skeptically scrutinize competing ideas • Open-minded humility before nature

  7. Critical Thinking • Critical Thinking - thinking that does not blindly accept arguments & conclusions. Rather, it examines assumptions, discerns hidden values, evaluates evidence, & assesses conclusions. • “Smart thinking” • Four elements • Examines assumptions • Discerns hidden values • Evaluates evidence • Assesses conclusions ..\Critical Thinking and History of Psych\Research Methods in Psychology, Part 1.flv

  8. How Do Psychologists Ask & Answer Questions?portal.two-early-approaches-functionalism-and-structuralism..\Critical Thinking and History of Psych\Psychology 101 - Wundt & James_ Structuralism & Functionalism - Vook.flv

  9. The Scientific Method • Theoryan explanation using an integrated set of principles that organizes observations & predicts behaviors or events. Organizes & isolates facts, simplifies things. Offers a useful summary. • “mere hunch” • Hypothesis- a testable prediction, often implied by a theory. Must imply testable prediction. Gives direction to research. • Can be confirmed or refuted

  10. The Scientific Method • Operational Definition - a statement of the procedures (operations) used to define research variables. • i.e. Human intelligence may be operationally defined as what an intelligence test measures. • Replication (repeat)- repeating the essence of a research study, usually with different participants in different situations, to see whether the basic finding extends to other participants and circumstances

  11. The Scientific Method • A good theory is useful if it: • Effectively organizes a range of self-reports and observations • Implies clear predictions that anyone can use to check the theory Scientific Method: Theory>>> Hypothesis >>> research/observation >>> confirm/refine theory

  12. DescriptionThe Case Study • Case Study – Research Method an observation technique in which one person is studied in depth in the hope of revealing universal principles. • Used in early brain studies • Used by Freud in Personality Theories • Used by Piaget for childhood development Suggest HYPOTHSESES further study Cannot discern general truths can be misleading & lead to false conclusions

  13. DescriptionThe Survey • Survey- a technique for ascertaining the self-reported attitudes or behaviors of a particular group, usually by questioning a representative, random sample of the group. • Looks at many cases at once often in less depth

  14. Wording effects-asking ?’s can be tricky • Subtle changes in word order, word usage (neg/pos), word phrasing can all affect results • Sampling • False Consensus-effect tendency to overestimate others’ agreement with us • Representative sample-cross section of pop. • Population- all the cases in a group being studied, from which samples may be drawn. • Note: Except for nat’l studies, it does NOT refer to a country’s whole population. • Random Sample-sample that fairly represents a pop. b/c each member has an = chance of inclusion.

  15. DescriptionThe Survey • Random Sampling • Can be remarkable accurate. • But large sampling that is not random can be misleading. A large sample is NOT enough • It must be random to increase accuracy

  16. DescriptionNaturalistic Observation • Naturalistic Observation- observing & recording behavior in naturally occurring situations w/out trying to manipulate & control the situation. • Describes behavior • Does not explain behavior • Should use operation definition- must define exactly what is being observed • Often used to describe behavior • Can also be used with correlational research

  17. Correlationportalhow-to-interpret-correlationsDescribing behavior is a first step toward predicting it • Correlationa measure of the extent to which 2 factors vary together, & thus of how well either factor predicts the other. (correlation coefficient) a statistical index of the relationship btwn 2 things (from -1 to +1). • How well does A predict B • Positive versus negative correlation • Strength of the correlation • -1.0 to +1.0 • Scatterplot

  18. CorrelationDescribing behavior is a first step toward predicting it • Scatterplot- a graphed cluster of dots, each of which represents the values of two variables. The slope of the points suggests the direction of the relationship between the two variables. The amount of scatter suggests the strength of the correlation (little scatter indicates high correlation). • Statistics- help us “see” what we may not “see”. Statistical Illumination

  19. Correlation

  20. Correlation

  21. Correlation

  22. Correlation

  23. Correlation

  24. Correlation

  25. Correlation

  26. Correlation

  27. CorrelationCorrelation & Causation • Correlation helps predict only • Does not imply cause & effect • Indicates the possibility of causation only

  28. Correlation • Illusory Correlation - the perception of a relationship where none exists. Occurs when we rely on only 1 element of evidence. • Over sensitivity to dramatic events = increases likelihood of noticing & or remembering • Perceived non- existent correlation • Can occur due to pre determined ideas • A random coincidence

  29. CorrelationPerceiving Order in Random Events • Comes from our natural need to make sense out of the world. We search for order/patterns • Coin flip • Poker hand 1..\Critical Thinking and History of Psych\Correlation and Causation.flv

  30. Experimentationportaltypes-of-research-design.html • Experiment- a research method in which an investigator manipulates 1 or more factors (independent variables) to observe the effect on some behavior or mental process (the dependent variable). By random assignment of participants, the experimenter aims to control other relevant factors. • Many factors influence behavior • Experiments can isolate cause & effect by statistically controlling for other factors • Control of factors (statistically removing differences) • Manipulation of the factor(s) of interest • Hold constant (“controlling”) factors

More Related