1 / 21

Intro to Radiation Biology is it gonna git you?

Intro to Radiation Biology is it gonna git you?. Radiation exposure Alpha up to 7.5 MeV Stopped in dead layer of normal skin Beta: penetrate 4 m thru air per MeV of energy Penetrate 0.5 cm in soft tissue per MeV of energy Up to 70 KeV: stopped in dead layer of skin

Download Presentation

Intro to Radiation Biology is it gonna git you?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Intro to Radiation Biologyis it gonna git you? • Radiation exposure • Alpha up to 7.5 MeV • Stopped in dead layer of normal skin • Beta: penetrate 4 m thru air per MeV of energy • Penetrate 0.5 cm in soft tissue per MeV of energy • Up to 70 KeV: stopped in dead layer of skin • Gamma, X-ray: high penetrating ability • Ingestion, inhalation of radioactive material • Opportunity for continuous radiation

  2. Radiation reacts with main cellular component: Water • Water comprises 60% of humans, average • Ionization of water leads to free radical formation: H* and *OH (where * is unpaired electron) • Possible reactions • H* + *OH = HOH (reunite to form water) • H* + H* = H2; *OH + *OH = H2O2 • *OH and peroxide are very reactive • Damage cell membranes, proteins, and DNA • Possibility of antioxidants as treatment

  3. Radiation damage is at the level of the cell • Organisms die because organ systems fail because cells die

  4. Cells are not equally sensitive • 1906 Bergonie and Tribondeau realized that cells were most sensitive to radiation when they are: • Rapidly dividing • Undifferentiated • Have a long mitotic future • The more often they divide, the more chances for DNA damage to result in cell death. • Much known about effect on plants • Couldn’t run away?

  5. Tissues vary in Radiation Sensitivity

  6. Clinical effect of acute exposure 100 rad = 1 Sv http://www.e-radiography.net/radsafety/rad_biology.htm

  7. Clinical-2 100 rad = 1 Sv

  8. Clinical -3

  9. Nuclear Accident in Japan • SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 • Two of the three workers exposed to radiation • are in extremely critical condition. • The number of leukocytes (granulocytes) of the three rose by two to four times the normal level. • The % of lymphocytes among white blood cells, which averages 40 percent among ordinary people also dropped below 10 percent and the figure for Ouchi and Shinohara is as low as 2 percent. • The radiation dose for the two in critical condition estimated at 8 to 10 sieverts judging from their lymphocytes and overall condition. When JCO workers remained alive, and one of the two more exposed improved, the initial estimates were questioned.

  10. continued • Experts said dose estimates in Sieverts (rems) are inappropriate for the Tokai workers, since Sieverts express dose equivalents. Grays, which express absorbed dose, are used to measure high doses that produce immediate effects. Experts at France's Institute of Protection and Nuclear Safety (IPSN) said the top dose was probably closer to 6 Grays. • Hisashi Ouchi, 35, died of multiple organ failure at 11:21 PM. Ouchi, whose death came 83 days after the accident, has become the first person in Japan to die from radiation exposure at a nuclear-related facility.

  11. Effects on different organ systems • Blood • RBCs fairly resistant. Why? • WBCs very sensitive; bone marrow cells too • Failure of immune system, clotting • Digestive system • Small intestine most sensitive, needs continual replacement, necessary for nutrient absorption • Both intestines: blood vessels near surface • Reproductive: sperm tough, germ line not • 3-6 Sv cause permanent sterility

  12. Shallow vs. Deep Dose • Given equal amount of energy, beta more likely to cause erythema (red inflammation of skin) • All energy is deposited there • Gamma: deep dose • Low impact on skin, but dose is deeper and more spread out. • In a criticality accident like in Japan, both neutrons and gamma rays, complex effects.

  13. Other Acute effects • Effect of acute dose • Premature aging • Cancers such as leukemia • Leukemia most common radiation-induced cancer • Increase in change in STRPs • Simple tandem repeat polymorphisms, “markers” present in DNA, generally non-coding. • Acute exposure at Chernobyl of 0.185 Sv produced 2x background mutation rate.

  14. STRPs: Microsatellite DNA • Simple Tandem Repeat Polymorphisms • These are RFLPs because they are defined by or visible following restriction enzyme cuts. • Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms • 2-9 nucleotides repeated, shorter than VNTRs • Small enough number for PCR amplification • Also called STRs, SSLPs, etc. • Radiation damage at restriction site changes fragment length, changes PCR product.

  15. STRPs Primers for both sides of repeated region allow PCR amplification of DNA; generates PCR products that differ in length depending on number of repeats. Becoming the standard method for DNA testing in forensics labs. Cheaper, easier, more sensitive.

  16. Chronic effects • Long term exposure to low levels of radiation • No one knows, can’t be statistically demonstrated • Linear No Threshold hypothesis (LNT) predicts no safe level of radiation exposure • Highly controversial • Forms basis of radiation regulations • Single exposure of 1 Sv may show clinical effect, but why would 10 exposures of 0.1 Sv each have any effect?

  17. Threshold vs. LNT www.aboutnuclear.org/i/radiation/lnt.jpg

  18. Hormesis: might a little radiation be good for you? Small doses consistent with background levels of radiation seem to have a positive effect. www.giriweb.com/luckey.htm

  19. Hormesis vs. LNT • B. Cohen’s test of the LNT hypothesis • If increased exposure to radiation at any level is harmful, then living in an area in which radon is higher should result in greater incidence of cancer. • Cohen does NOT intend to demonstrate hormesis, but merely test the LNT hypothesis. • Hormesis advocates, however, use his data.

  20. Hypothesis needs a mechanism • Idea of “dangerous in large amounts, helpful in small amounts” is awfully “new-age.” • Stress proteins: • Apply stress, cells compensate. Heat shock proteins, up-regulation of chaperonins. • More active supply of DNA repair proteins • Stimulation of immune system. • For more info: http://www.giriweb.com/luckey.htm

More Related