Violence against women act forensic compliance issues
Download
1 / 21

Violence Against Women Act Forensic Compliance Issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 81 Views
  • Uploaded on

Violence Against Women Act Forensic Compliance Issues. VAWA Forensic Compliance 2005 Reauthorization. 42 USCA S. 3796gg-4.b.3.D.d.1

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Violence Against Women Act Forensic Compliance Issues ' - heriberto-noboa


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Violence against women act forensic compliance issues

Violence Against Women Act Forensic Compliance Issues


Vawa forensic compliance 2005 reauthorization
VAWA Forensic Compliance 2005 Reauthorization

42 USCA S. 3796gg-4.b.3.D.d.1

“Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit a State, Indian tribal government, or territorial government to require a victim of sexual assault to participate in the criminal justice system or cooperate with law enforcement in order to be provided with a forensic medical exam, reimbursement for charges incurred on account of such an exam, or both.”


Why the change
Why the Change?

  • Up to 84% of all sexual assaults go unreported – increasing reporting increases victims’ access to health care

  • Forensic evidence collection is time-sensitive

  • Acute emotional trauma inhibits the trauma victim’s decision making capacity


Deadline
Deadline

  • January 5, 2009

  • States must be able to certify, in good faith, that they are in compliance with the statutory eligibility requirements within VAWA

  • A breakdown in system could jeopardize VAWA STOP funds


Models of compliance
Models of Compliance

  • Evidence Collection Option

  • Anonymous / “Jane Doe” Reporting

  • Anonymous Mandatory Reporting

  • Evidence Based Prosecution Option

  • The Military Model: Restricted & Unrestricted Reporting


Evidence collection option
Evidence Collection Option

Guiding Principle

  • Emphasis on healthcare and evidence collection, and not on reporting to law enforcement

    Characteristics

  • Victims are offered a SAFE Exam regardless of their decision to cooperate or participate with justice system

  • From a law enforcement perspective, no crime has taken place unless & until victim elects to report at a later date

  • Hospital stores kit in some cases


Evidence collection option new york
Evidence Collection Option: New York

Every hospital providing treatment to alleged victims of a sexual offense shall be responsible for:

  • 1-a. maintaining sexual offense evidence and the Chain of Custody as provided in subdivision two of this section.

  • 1-b. contacting a rape crisis or victim assistance organization, if any, providing victim assistance to the geographic area served by that hospital to establish the coordination of non-medical services to sexual offense victims who request such coordination and services.

    Source: New York State Public Health Law; Section 2805-i; “Treatment of sexual offense patients and maintenance of evidence in a sexual offense, including Sections 2805-i (4-b) and 2805-i (5); Establishment of hospital-based Sexual Assault Forensic Examiner Programs”; And New York State Public Health Law; Section 2805-p; “Emergency treatment of rape survivors” 2805-i. Treatment of sexual offense victims and maintenance of evidence in a sexual offense.


Anonymous jane doe blind reporting
Anonymous/ “Jane Doe”/ Blind Reporting

Guiding Principle

  • Emphasizes keeping victim’s identity from law enforcement

    Characteristics

  • Victims are offered a SAFE exam regardless of decision to cooperate or participate with justice system

  • From a law enforcement perspective, they are not investigating until victim chooses to make a full report

  • Law enforcement may document evidence through a police report or an informational report

  • Generally, law enforcement transports evidence to police department for storage

  • Also known as ‘Third Party Reporting’


Anonymous reporting oregon
Anonymous Reporting: Oregon

SAFE Kits, where the identity of the victim is unknown, will need to be assigned a case number and entered into evidence. Methods such as Jane Doe reporting, citizen contact, suspicious incident or sexual offense can be utilized for generating a case number.

Source: Attorney General’s Sexual Assault Task Force Recommended Law Enforcement Policy


Anonymous mandatory reporting
Anonymous Mandatory Reporting

Guiding Principles

  • Uniform reporting of sexual assault will allow the State to learn much more regarding the prevalence of sexual assault.

    Characteristics

  • Victims are offered a SAFE exam regardless of their decision to cooperate with law enforcement and/or participate with the criminal justice system

  • From a law enforcement perspective, a crime has taken place, which is generally documented through an alternative manner (such as a supplemental report filed by a health care provider)

  • Generally, law enforcement transports evidence to police department for storage


Anonymous mandatory reporting massachusetts
Anonymous Mandatory Reporting:Massachusetts

“Every physician attending, treating, or examining a victim of rape or sexual assault, or, whenever any such case is treated in a hospital, sanatorium or other institution, the manager, superintendent or other person in charge thereof, shall report such case at once to the criminal history systems board and to the police of the town where the rape or sexual assault occurred but shall not include the victim’s name, address, or any other identifying information. The report shall describe the general area where the attack occurred. Whoever violates any provision of this section shall be punished by a fine of not less than fifty dollars nor more than one hundred dollars.”

Source: M.G.L.C. 112§ 12½


Evidence based prosecution option
Evidence Based Prosecution Option

Guiding Principle

  • Proper evidence collection may allow prosecutor to proceed in prosecuting the case with physical evidence only

    Characteristics

  • Similar to Pro-Prosecution model for Domestic Violence

  • At this time, this theoretical option is being considered as a possibility in a few jurisdictions


Military restricted reporting
Military: Restricted Reporting

Guiding Principles

  • Recognizes the significant deterrents to reporting within the military

  • Emphasizes the availability of supportive services

  • Encourages more accurate data collection

    Characteristics

  • Similar to the civilian Anonymous Reporting options

  • Victim is afforded protection from Chain of Command notifications

  • Victim may opt to change the report to “Unrestricted” in the future


Promising statutes policies
Promising Statutes & Policies

  • Evidence Collection:

    • New York

  • Sexual Assault Examiner Program Fact Sheet:

  • http://criminaljustice.state.ny.us/ofpa/saefactsheet.htm

  • Sexual Assault Protocol for the Acute Care of the Adult Patient Reporting Sexual Assault November 2004:

  • http://www.health.state.ny.us/professionals/protocols_and_guidelines/sexual_assault/docs/adult_protocol.pdf

  • Anonymous Reporting:

    • Oregon

  • HB 2154:

  • http://www.oregonsatf.org/documents/HB%202154%20A-engrossed.pdf

  • Mandatory Reporting:

    • Massachusetts

  • Provider Sexual Crime Report:

  • http://www.mass.gov/Eeops/docs/programs/fjj/provider_sexual_crime_report.pdf

  • Transportation Protocol:

  • http://www.mass.gov/Eeops/docs/programs/law%20enf/2006_transport_letter.doc

  • http://www.mass.gov/Eeops/docs/programs/law%20enf/2006_transport_protocol.doc


Common barriers
Common Barriers

  • Conflicting Legislation

  • Response Protocol

  • Reimbursement Process

  • Handling of Evidence (Tracking, Transportation, and Storage)


Resolving barriers state level vs local level
Resolving Barriers:State Level vs. Local Level

  • Explore what efforts, if any, exist at the state level to address compliance issues

  • Identify Barriers that are appropriate for local multidisciplinary Response Teams (SART, SARRT, or other) to address


Conflicting legislation
Conflicting Legislation

  • Generally addressed on the state level

    Common Issues

  • Conflicts with mandatory reporting

  • Statutes addressing exam payments and/or reimbursements


Response protocols
Response Protocols

  • Most likely a state response and a local response

    Common Issues

  • Developing statewide protocols in response to enabling legislation

  • SART issue to discuss local response


Reimbursement payment issues
Reimbursement/ Payment Issues

  • Generally addressed on the state level

    Common Issues

  • Statutory roadblocks

  • Administrative roadblocks


Handling of evidence
Handling of Evidence

  • May be a state and/or a local issue

    Common Issues

  • Once evidence is collected, where is it stored?

  • How is it transported?

  • How is it tracked?

  • Decide whether or not it will be processed through FBI’s CODIS


National ta project
National TA Project

  • MCASA is a designated National Technical Assistance provider by the USDOJ Office on Violence Against Women

  • MCASA is researching, designing and disseminating a toolkit to aid States in becoming compliant

    • Phone: (410) 974-4507

      Debra Bright, National TA Project Director

      Email: [email protected]


ad