1 / 18

2008 Elementary School Feeder Pattern Committee

2008 Elementary School Feeder Pattern Committee. Appoquinimink School District. Schedule of Reports. April 8: Board Report May 13: Board First Reading: Town Meetings: May 27: Townsend Elementary (6:30p) May 28: New Covenant Presbyterian Church (1125 Jamison Corner Road, 10:00a)

heriberto-noboa
Download Presentation

2008 Elementary School Feeder Pattern Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2008 Elementary School Feeder Pattern Committee Appoquinimink School District

  2. Schedule of Reports April 8: Board Report May 13: Board First Reading: Town Meetings: May 27: Townsend Elementary (6:30p) May 28: New Covenant Presbyterian Church (1125 Jamison Corner Road, 10:00a) May 28: Cedar Lane Elementary (6:30p) June 10: Board Second Reading:

  3. Members Parents: Building Administrators: Dr. Nemish Mehta (OBL) Lorraine Lybarger/Shevena Cale Kris Baxter (CLE) Donna K./Rebecca Feathers Karen Hopkins (SLE) Sharon Pepukayi/Cyndi Clay Jeffory Gibeault (BME*) Don Davis Michele Frayler (TES) Lucia Weathers District Administration: Gregg Tulowitzky (chairperson) Data Support: Chuck Longfellow, Sandy Joswick, Andy Woitko University of Delaware: John Laznik, Center for Applied Demography and Survey Research

  4. Factors to Consider • Balanced enrollment in grade-level schools, anticipating growth • Students would remain with others from their community to attend the school nearest their community • Equitable distribution of students based on “socio-economic” status (Free/Reduced Lunch) • Equitable distribution of students based on ethnicity

  5. Dangers To Avoid (if possible) • Moving one border community back and forth between schools in successive redistricting plans. • (within 5 years) • Students assigned to a school and would drive by a same grade-level school.

  6. Services Utilized • Technology Management and Design (Department of Education, Don Berry) • ArcGIS Software • (University of Delaware, John Laznik) • eSchool (DOE) • Trapeze Redistricting Software (Tulowitzky)

  7. Current Enrollment District 3,329 (Enrollment as of 2/14) # of Students (% Building Capacity) OBL 682 (94%) SLE 678 (102%) CLE 652 (82%) BME 806 (98%) TES 511 (112%)

  8. Projected Enrollment With Plan F District 3,820 (Estimate for 9/30/2009) # of Students (% Building Capacity) OBL 730 (101.39%) NEW 670 (81.71%) SLE 610 (91.73%) CLE 690 (86.25%) BME 670 (81.71%) TES 450 (98.90%) Employee Student Choice from Out of District ??

  9. Plan F Free/Reduced Lunch (Grade 1-5) District 15.59% 07/08 08/09 OBL 5.72 6.06 NEW 0 12.78 SLE 29.94 28.57 CLE 5.37 8.51 BME 17.00 20.31 TES 20.55 23.65

  10. Plan F Ethnic Percentages 1 2 3 4 5 District .66 23.49 4.54 4.48 66.84 OBL .91 19.55 12.58 2.88 64.09 NEW .68 22.32 1.53 4.94 70.53 SLE .20 32.29 3.13 6.26 58.12 CLE .90 15.23 2.69 2.69 78.49 BME .77 28.73 3.53 5.84 61.14 TES .30 23.05 1.50 4.49 70.66 1-Native American 2-African American 3-Asian 4-Hispanic 5-Caucasian

  11. Questions??

More Related