1 / 13

Workshop 2 DEDP APPRAISAL

Workshop 2 DEDP APPRAISAL. Region/Division shall be given a copy of a sample DEDP – Division Situational Overview/Analysis which has the overall description of Division performance, needs and opportunities in the following: A. Pre-elementary B. Elementary C. Secondary

heman
Download Presentation

Workshop 2 DEDP APPRAISAL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Workshop 2DEDP APPRAISAL

  2. Region/Division shall be given a copy of a sample DEDP – Division Situational Overview/Analysis which has the overall description of Division performance, needs and opportunities in the following: A. Pre-elementary B. Elementary C. Secondary D. Alternative Learning System 1

  3. 3 • Situational Analysis - Suggested Outline • Cause and Effect Analysis (including diagrams) • Forecast of Future Situation • Review of Current efforts (programs/projects) and their gaps • Opportunity Analysis (SWOT)

  4. 2 Using the checklist/outline as guidelines, analyze the situational overview • Segmentation • Problems, needs, strengths and opportunities clearly described? > Are there supporting analysis? • Has forecasting been made? • Best practice/not so good practice

  5. 4 Organize/present your analysis in this format:

  6. 5 You may divide the group and assign work by components (pre-elementary, elementary, secondary, ALS) Post outputs at the walls. Each group will have the use of manila paper, meta strips, permanent markers, scissors, masking tape 6 2 Hours for this workshop

  7. The groups then will take turns in presenting their outputs; what has been mentioned should not be repeated 7 8 A synthesis will be made after all outputs are presented

  8. General Comments • Data Mapping • Difficult to locate the problem • No coherence in statements • Accuracy of data • No cause-effect analysis (streams analysis) • Description of programs/projects – no correlation to situational analysis • No forecasting • No illustration or tables presented to support/highlight trend • Tables should be substantiated with analysis and not mere narrative discussion • No linkage between formal and non-formal

  9. Workshop 1: General Comments Preschools No data mapping No forecasting Inconsistency and inadequacy of data (not updated data) Attributions backed up with data Pre-elementary to preschool education No data on preschool teachers, curriculum, classroom size, etc (vis-à-vis standards)

  10. Elementary No evidence of cause-effect analysis No segmentation technique used There was no analysis on performance indicators Inconsistency in data

  11. Secondary No forecasting Inconsistency in data (narrative discussion vis-à-vis tables) No segmentation – problems should have been identified by category/kind of school Sweeping statements

  12. ALS General statements/judgments - no data mapping No in-depth analysis of tables presented Inaccurate and inadequate data No segmentation

  13. General Recommendations Segmentation Provide forecasting Check accuracy/adequateness/reliability of data Present data in graphical/tabular form; disaggregation of data Provide SWOT analysis Include data analysis on private schools

More Related