1 / 21

Situation of the NPP in Spain

Situation of the NPP in Spain. WHAT IS AMAC?. - OBJECTIVES: SAFETY OF THE FACILITIES PLANS FOR NUCLEAR EMERGENCY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - 8 NUCLEAR SITES: 7 WITH NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 1 WITH M & L RADIOACTIVE WASTE - 70 MUNICIPALITIES - 80.000 INHABITANTS

helms
Download Presentation

Situation of the NPP in Spain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Situation of the NPP in Spain

  2. WHAT IS AMAC? - OBJECTIVES: SAFETY OF THE FACILITIES PLANS FOR NUCLEAREMERGENCY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - 8 NUCLEAR SITES: 7 WITH NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 1 WITH M & L RADIOACTIVE WASTE - 70 MUNICIPALITIES - 80.000 INHABITANTS - RURAL OR SEMI-RURAL AREAS

  3. Territory and nuclear facilities • Previous reality • Staying away from the yes/no debate on nuclear energy • Risk consciousness • Necessity of cohabitation with the facility • Future foreseeing • Safety guarantee for the future

  4. Municipal responsibilities • Municipalities as a means of information • There is a political obligation for representatives to participate • There is a legal obligation for the administration: • - General competences in environment, public health, civil protection and territorial planning • - Specific competences in urbanism and building license as well as in environmental issues • - Participation in some other proceedings: nuclear facilities authorization and environmental impact assessment • - Direct responsibility and participation in the Emergency Planning

  5. Local governance vs. Nuclear energy • Three basic pillars to earn people trust: • Safety: nonnegotiable concept & guarantee of nuclear policies • Information / Participation. Necessary policy • Economic development. Guarantee for the future

  6. NUCLEAR MUNICIPAL PARTNERSHIP MUNICIPAL DEMANDS: - INCREASE OF INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION - MEANS FOR EMERGENCY NEGOTIATION - LIMITATION OF WASTE STORAGE IN THE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS - ALTERNATIVE ECONOMICAL DEVELOPMENT

  7. Information and transparency The confidence as the basis for information: whoever receives the information has to believe in it. Transparency. Information must be fully given Availability. Permanently on-line Objective. No convincing should be needed Comprehensible. Difficulty of technical terms vs. Public access to the information

  8. Participation • Public participation in DMP as a proceeding for a solution and also as a guarantee for long term governance • The Aarhus agreement and other experiences within the EU and western countries: Wellenberg, Stola-Mona, La Hague, Erajoki, etc. • Participation implies: • - Constant exchange of information • - Information credibility • - Stakeholders involvement • - Coherence of the debate • - Efficiency in the relations among Administrations - Social-scientific dialogue • - Final consensus for decisions

  9. Gráfico 2.1. Opinion about real risk and what kind of risk Fuente: CERES, 2003

  10. Gráfico 2.6. Do you think that NPP pollute the environment?

  11. Emergency planning ¿Is there any emergency planning in your region? ¿Do you know it?

  12. RADWASTE What is your opinion about the safety ok radioactive waste? Fuente: CERES, 2003

  13. RADWASTE Do you know if a plan for radwaste management exist currently?

  14. Gráfico 7.1. Do you think that there is enough information about NPP?

  15. Gráfico 7.10. What kind of information would you like to get?

  16. Gráfico 7.14. ¿Do you think that the existence of a local commission of information could be useful?

  17. AMAC’S PROPOSAL • OBJECTIVES: • - ACCEPTANCE OF POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITIES • - TO SPREAD CONFIDENCE • 3. - TO CREATE STRUCTURES FOR THE DEBATE • 4. - TO MAKE TRANSPARENCY AND PARTICIPATION POSSIBLE • 5. - TO DEFINE A FUTURE FOR RADIOCTIVE WASTE

  18. Local Commissions of Information MUNICIPAL INICITIVE FUNCTION: - To know the incidences of the nuclear power plant both planned and no planned (energy production, waste management, etc) OBLIGATIONS: - Transmit the information to the population of the municipalities - Take care of the requests of information of the citizens obtaining the necessary data from the operating company and the responsible institutions of the activity of the NPP. - Organize events for the consequence of its aims like meetings, conferences, seminaries, etc..

  19. IMPROVING PARTICIPATION.RISING THE KNOWLEGE • MAYORS: - Facilitate the access to the information in nuclear matter to the mayors and councilors that belong to AMAC to improve their knowledge in nuclear items • CITIZENS: - Surveys show that there is not enough knowledge in what is the nuclear energy and the institutions that regulate it in the population that lives in a 10 kilometers maximum radius of the seven existing NPP in the Spanish territory  So AMAC organize with the support of CSN and ENRESA: - Seminaries in the different Spanish nuclear zones for the population living in that areas. - Visits to the Information Center of the Spanish nuclear institutions.

  20. Spanish COWAM programme • Based on the results of COWAM I, the project will make specific to our country and our culture the base of experience in this field in the matter of radioactive waste management. • AIMS: - Elaboration of a methodology for the decision making process connected with the definition, location and search of locations for the radioactive waste - Creation and relation of a network of actors - Constitution of a several work groups integrated by representatives of the local world and other involved administrations, scientific and expert of Universities

  21. STRATEGY FOR THE FUTURE • PRESSURE BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT AND THE PARLIAMENTARY GROUPS: POLITICAL DECISION • COLLABORATION WITH THE CSN AND THE ADMINISTRATION FOR THE CREATION OF THE LOCAL COMMISSIONS • SELFINVOLVEMENT IN THE RADWASTE NATIONAL DEBATE ACCEPTING THEIR ROL AND POLITICAL RESPONSABILITIES • PARTICIPATION IN BOTH EUROPEAN AND SPANISH COWAM WITH THE PURPOSE OF DEFINING A SPANISH METHODOLOGY WORKING WITH OTHER ACTORS

More Related