1 / 28

Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations

Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations. Barry Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Midwest Field Office 312.353-9286 barry.kaplan@usdoj.gov. What is Antitrust?. The Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §1).

helena
Download Presentation

Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Understanding, Detecting & Reporting Antitrust Violations Barry Kaplan U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Midwest Field Office 312.353-9286 barry.kaplan@usdoj.gov

  2. What is Antitrust?

  3. The Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §1) • “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.” • Prohibits agreements among competitors in restraint of trade or commerce • Price fixing, market allocation and bid rigging are all criminal violations

  4. Elements of an Offense • Concerted action in the restraint of trade – i.e., an agreement among competitors • Between two or more independent entities • Affecting interstate or foreign commerce

  5. Bid Rigging • Agreement in advance to manipulate outcome of bidding process • Types: • Bid Suppression • Complementary Bidding • Bid Rotation

  6. What do you think the penalties are for Sherman Act violations?

  7. It's risky, of course---if we're caught, it could mean many hours of community service.

  8. Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement Act of 2004 • Increased maximum criminal penalties: • Individuals- 10 years and/or $1,000,000; • Corporations- $100 Million • Alternative fine provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3571 • Twice the gross financial loss or gain resulting from the violation where this number would exceed $100 Million.

  9. Companion Violations • Bribery/Gratuities (18 U.S.C § 201) • False & Fictitious Claims (18 U.S.C. § 287) • Conspiracy to Defraud U.S. (18 U.S.C. § 371) • False Statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) • Mail/Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343) • Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1519)

  10. Why am I here? $819,000,000,000

  11. NO PRESSURE Risk Management “Agencies must immediately review the risk framework . . . and initiate risk mitigation strategies.”

  12. 4 Agreement 3 Opportunity 2 Means 1 Motive Evolution of Collusion

  13. BATTLING BID RIGGINGSee the Signs • Market • Application • Patterns • Suspicious Behavior

  14. Market: Are Conditions Conducive to Collusion?

  15. Market: Are Conditions Conducive to Collusion? • No readily available substitutes • The product is standardized • Vendors repeatedly sell to the same buyers • Competitors in an industry frequently interact • Bidders personally submit bids at the same physical location

  16. APPLICATION:The Dumb Crook • Similar applications – handwriting; typeface; stationery • Last-minute changes – white-outs or physical alterations to prices • Vendor picks up an extra bid package for another vendor OR submits a competing vendor’s bid

  17. Paper v. Electronic • Same basic fraudulent conduct • Other M.A.P.S. factors to look for: • Metadata (hidden data) • Cover e-mail header info. incorrect • Same math errors, typos, etc.

  18. Metadata Can be Revealing:

  19. Patterns in Bids or Prices • The vendors take turns as the winning bidder (bid rotation) • The winner subcontracts work to losers • It all evens out • The same guys always win (or lose) • Bids are unusually high • Fewer than normal number of bidders

  20. PATTERNS:Bid Rotation • Bid 1: Company A wins • Bid 2: Company B wins • Bid 3: Company C wins • Bid 4: Company A wins • Bid 5: Company B wins • Bid 6: Company C wins

  21. PATTERNS:Bid Suppression • Bid 1: Companies A, B, C, and D bid • Bid 2: Companies B, C, and D bid • Bid 3: Companies A, C, and D bid • Bid 4: Companies A, B, and D bid • Bid 5: Companies A, B, and C bid Also watch for subcontracts to the company that sits out!

  22. PATTERNS:Who Is Getting What • Bid 1: A wins a $3 million contract • Bid 2: B wins a $5 million contract • Bid 3: C wins a $1 million contract • Bid 4: C wins a $4 million contract • Bid 5: A wins a $2 million contract Everyone = $5 million

  23. SUSPICIOUS BEHAVIOR:Itching to Get Caught • No Chance Bidder – Bids submitted by vendor known to lack the ability to perform • Betting Bidder – Vendor brings multiple bids to an opening or submits bid once other bidders are determined • Loud Mouth Bidder – Suspicious statements

  24. Detecting Bidding Fraud – Best Practices Examine the bid files for: • Incomplete files • Irregularities • Same phrasing • Same return address • Same price calculations or errors

  25. PARTING WORDS • Remember M.A.P.S. • Err on the side of reporting suspicions • We are here to assist you • Barry Kaplan • U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division • Midwest Field Office • 312.353-9286 • barry.kaplan@usdoj.gov

More Related