- 36 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

[Start] Generate random population of N chromosomes (suitable solutions for the problem)

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- [Start] Generate random population of N chromosomes (suitable solutions for the problem)
- [Fitness] Evaluate the fitness f(x) of each chromosome x in the population
- [New population] Create a new population by repeating following steps until the new population is complete
- [Selection] Select two parent chromosomes from a population according to their fitness (the better fitness, the bigger chance to be selected)
- [Crossover] With a crossover probability cross over the parents to form a new offspring (children). If no crossover was performed, offspring is an exact copy of parents.
- [Mutation] With a mutation probability mutate new offspring at each locus (position in chromosome).
- [Accepting] Place new offspring in a new population

- [Replace] Use new generated population for a further run of algorithm
- [Test] If the end condition is satisfied, stop, and return the best solution in current population
- [Loop] Go to step 2.

- Check the following applets
- http://www.obitko.com/tutorials/genetic-algorithms/example-function-minimum.php

maximum

x = 6.092

y = 7.799

f(x,y)max = 100

- The GA described so far is similar to Holland’s original GA.
- It is now known as the simple genetic algorithm (SGA).
- Other GAs use different:
- Representations
- Mutations
- Crossovers
- Selection mechanisms

- Multipoint crossover
- Uniform crossover

- Decade long debate: which one is better
- Answer (at least, rather wide agreement):
- it depends on the problem, but
- in general, it is good to have both
- these two have different roles
- a mutation-only-GA is possible, an xover-only-GA would not work

- Crossover is explorative
- Discovering promising areas in the search space.
- It makes a big jump to an area somewhere “in between” two (parent) areas.

- Mutation is exploitative
- Optimizing present information within an already discovered promising region.
- Creating small random deviations and thereby not wandering far from the parents.

- They complement each other.
- Only crossover can bring together information from both parents.
- Only mutation can introduce completely new information.

Feature Selection, Feature Extraction

- We’re interested in features – we want to know which are relevant. If we fit a model, it should be interpretable.
- facilitate data visualization and data understanding
- reduce experimental costs (measurements)

- faster training
- defy the curse of dimensionality

- In feature selection we try to find the best subset of the input feature set.
- In feature extraction we create new features based on transformation or combination of the original feature set.
- Both selection and extraction lead to the dimensionality reduction.
- No clear cut evidence that one of them is superior to the other on all types of task.

Feature selection(FS)

- Filter
- Assess the relevance of features only by looking at the intrinsic properties of the data.
- Usually, calculate the feature relevance score and remove low-scoring features.

- Wrapper
- Bundle the search for best model with the FS.
- Generate and evaluate various subsets of features. The evaluation is obtained by training and testing a specific ML model.

- Embedded
- The search for an optimal subset is built into the classifier construction (e.g. decision trees).

- Two steps (score-and-filter approach)
- assess each feature individually for ist potential in discriminating among classes in the data
- features falling beyong threshold are eliminated

- Advantages:
- easily scale to high-dimensional data
- simple and fast
- independent of the classification algorithm

- Disadvantages:
- ignore the interaction with the classifier
- most techniques are univariate (each feature is considered separately)

- Distance measures
- Euclidean distance

- Dependence measures
- Pearson correlation coefficient
- χ2-test
- t-test
- AUC

- Information measures
- information gain
- mutual information

- complexity: O(d)

- Search for the best feature subset in combination with a fixed classification method.
- The goodness of a feature subset is determined using cross-validation (k-fold, LOOCV)
- Advantages:
- interaction between feature subset and model selection
- take into account feature dependencies
- generally more accurate

- Disadvantages:
- higher risk of overfitting than filter methods
- very computationally intensive

- Evaluate all possible subsets using exhaustive search – this leads to the optimum subset.
- For a total of d variables, and subset of size p, the total number of possible subsets is
- complexity: O(2d) (exponential)
- Various strategies how to reduce the search space.
- They are still O(2d), but much faster (at least 1000-times)
- e.g. “branch and bound”

e.g. d = 100, p = 10 → ≈2×1013

- Genetic algorithms
- Simulated Annealing

- Sequential Forward Selection (SFS)
- Sequential Backward Selection (SBS)
- “ Plus q take away r ” Selection
- Sequential Forward Floating Search (SFFS)
- Sequential Backward Floating Search (SBFS)

- SFS
- At the beginning select the best feature using a scalar criterion function.
- Add one feature at a time which along with already selected features maximizes the criterion function.
- A greedy algorithm, cannot retract (also called nesting effect).
- Complexity is O(d)

- SBS
- At the beginning select all d features.
- Delete one feature at a time and select the subset which maximize the criterion function.
- Also a greedy algorithm, cannot retract.
- Complexity is O(d).

- At first add q features by forward selection, then discard r features by backward selection
- Need to decide optimal q and r
- No subset nesting problems Like SFS and SBS

- SFFS
- It is a generalized “plus q take away r” algorithm
- The value of q and r are determined automatically
- Close to optimal solution
- Affordable computational cost
- Also in backward disguise

- The feature selection process is done inside the ML algorithm.
- Decision trees
- In final tree, only a subset of features are used

- Regularization
- It effectively “shuts down” unnecessary features.
- Pruning in NN.

Feature extraction(FE)

- FS – indetify and select the “best” features with respect to the target task.
- Selected features retain their original physical interpretation.

- FE – create new features as a transformation (combination) of original features. Usually followed by FS.
- May provide better discriminatory ability than the best subset.
- Do not retain the original physical interpretation, may not have clear meaning.

Principal Component Analysis(PCA)

x2

x1

x2

Make data

to have zero

mean (i.e.

move data into

[0, 0] point).

centering

x1

x2

This is a line given by equation

w0 + w1x1 + w2x2

This is another line

w’0 + w’1x1 + w’2x2

x1

The variability in data is highest along this line. It is called 1st principal component.

x2

And this is 2nd principal component.

x1

x2

Principal components (PC’s) are linear combinations of original coordinates.

The coefficients of linear combination (w0, w1, …) are called loadings.

In the transformed coordinate system, individual data points have different coordinates, these are called scores.

w0 + w1x1 + w2x2

w’0 + w’1x1 + w’2x2

x1

- PCA - orthogonal linear transformation that changes the data into a new coordinate system such that the variance is put in order from the greatest to the least.
- Solve the problem = find new orthogonal coordinate system = find loadings
- PC’s (vectors) and their corresponding variances (scalars) are found by eigenvalue decompositions of the covariance matrix C = XXT of the xi variables.
- Eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue is 1st PC.
- The 2nd eigenvector (the 2nd largest eigenvalue) is orthogonal to the 1st one. …

- Eigenvalue decomposition is computed using standard algorithms: eigen decomposition of covariance matrix (e.g. QR algorithm), SVD of mean centered data matrix.

- New variables (PCs) have a variance equal to their corresponding eigenvalue
Var(Yi)=i for all I = 1…p

- Smalli small variance data changes little in the direction of componentYi
- The relative variance explained by each PC is given by li / li

- Enough PCs to have a cumulative variance explained by the PCs that is >50-70%
- Kaiser criterion: keep PCs with eigenvalues >1
- Scree plot: represents the ability of PCs to explain de variation in data

barrier to local search

starting

point

descend

direction

local minima

global minima

Introduction to Simulated Annealing, Dr. Gildardo Sánchez ITESM Campus Guadalajara

desired effect

Help escaping the

local optima.

adverse effect

Might pass global optima

after reaching it

Introduction to Simulated Annealing, Dr. Gildardo Sánchez ITESM Campus Guadalajara

- Slowly cool down a heated solid, so that all particles arrange in the ground energy state.
- At each temperature wait until the solid reaches its thermal equilibrium.
- Probability of being in a state with energy E:

E … energy

T … temperature

kB … Boltzmann constant

Z(T) … normalization factor

Metropolis, 1953

Metropolis algorithm

- At a fixed temperature T:
- Perturb (randomly) the current state to a new state
- E is the difference in energy between current and new state
- If E < 0 (new state is lower), accept new state as current state
- If E 0 , accept new state with probability

- Eventually the systems evolves into thermal equilibrium at temperature T
- When equilibrium is reached, temperature T can be lowered and the process can be repeated

- Same algorithm can be used for combinatorial optimization problems:
- Energy E corresponds to the objective function C
- Temperature Tis parameter controlled within the algorithm

initialize;

REPEAT

REPEAT

perturb ( config.i config.j, Cij);

IF Cij < 0 THEN accept

ELSE IF exp(-Cij/T) > random[0,1) THEN accept;

IF accept THEN update(config.j);

UNTIL equilibrium is approached sufficient closely;

T := next_lower(T);

UNTIL system is frozen or stop criterion is reached

- Choose the start value of T so that in the beginning nearly all perturbations are accepted (exploration), but not too big to avoid long run times
- At each temperature, search is allowed to proceed for a certain number of steps, L(k).
- The function next_lower (T(k)) is generally a simple function to decrease T, e.g. a fixed part (80%) of current T.

- At the end T is so small that only a very small number of the perturbations is accepted (exploitation).
- The choice of parameters {T(k), L(k)} is called the cooling schedule.
- If possible, always try to remember explicitly the best solution found so far; the algorithm itself can leave its best solution and not find it again.