- 109 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Species-Habitat Associations

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The challenge of statistically identifying species-resource relationships on an uncooperative landscape

Or…

Facts, true facts, and statistics: a lesson in numeracy

Barry D. Smith & Kathy Martin

Canadian Wildlife Service, Pacific Wildlife Research Centre

Delta, B.C., Canada

Clive Goodinson

Free Agent,Vancouver, B.C., Canada

Species-Habitat Associations

Objective: To incorporate habitat suitability predictions

into a stand-level forest ecosystem model

+

=

Can we show statistically that the relative quantity of a resource on the landscape predicts the presence of a species such as Northern Flicker?

Logistic regression model output

Predicted

Predicted

0

1

0

1

ü

û

123

16

0

Observed

û

ü

9

74

1

Logistic regression model

- Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities

0 = Absent

1 = Present

Predicted

Sampling intensity is too low; birds occur within good habitat but sampling does not capture all occurrences.

0

1

ü

û

0

Observed

Habitat is not 100% saturated; there are areas of good habitat which are unoccupied.

û

ü

1

Spatial variability is too low or spatial periodicity of key habitat attributes is too high, given sampling intensity.

Habitat is over 100% saturated; birds occur in areas of poor habitat.

The playback tape pulls in individuals from outside the point-count radius.

So, can we expect be successful in detecting species-habitat associations when they exist?

- We use simulations where:
- we generated a landscape, then
- populated that landscape with a (territorial) species, then
- sampled the species and landscape repeatedly to assess our ability to detect a known association

Sample Simulation > Sample Sim’on

To be as realistic as possible we need to make decisions concerning…

- The characteristics of the landscape (resources)
- The species’ distribution on thelandscape
- The sampling method
- The statistical model(s)

Spatial contrast is essential for, but doesn’t guarantee, success

High Landscape Spatial Periodicity (SP)

Medium Landscape Spatial Periodicity (SP)

Low Landscape Spatial Periodicity (SP)

It might help to conceptualize required resources by consolidating them into four fundamental suites:

- Shelter (e.g., sleeping, breeding)
- Food (self, provisioning)
- Comfort (e.g. weather, temperature)
- Safety (predation risk)

To be as realistic as possible we had to make decisions concerning:

- The characteristics of the landscape
- The species’ distribution on thelandscape
- The sampling method
- The statistical model(s)

Territory establishment can be…

Species centred

Resource centred

…but in either case sufficient resources must be accumulated for an individual to establish a territory

If territory establishment is…

Species centred

…then the ‘Position function” sets the parameters for territory establishment

Territory establishment

Saturation

Half-saturation

Territory densities may be…

High

Low

…so realistic simulations must be calibrated to the real world

To be as realistic as possible we had to make decisions concerning:

- The characteristics of the landscape
- The species’ distribution on thelandscape
- The sampling method
- The statistical model(s)

Detection Function

Point-count radius

Vegetation plot radius

To be as realistic as possible we had to make decisions concerning:

- The characteristics of the landscape
- The species’ distribution on thelandscape
- The sampling method
- The statistical model(s)

The statistical model

- Deterministic model structure
- Multiple regression, Logistic

- Model error
- Normal, Poisson, Binomial

- Model selection
- Parsimony (AIC), Bonferroni’s alpha, Statistical significance

The deterministic model

- Multiple regression (with 2 resources)
- Yi= B0 + B1X1i + B2X2i + B12X1iX2i + εi
- or Yi= f(X) + εi

- Yi = detection (0,1,2,…)
- X•i = resource value

The deterministic model

- Logarithmic:
- Yi= e f(X) + εi

- Yi = detection (0,1,2,...)
- X•i = resource value

The deterministic model

- Logistic:
- Yi= Ae f(X) /(1+ e f(X)) + εi

- Yi = detection (0,1,2,…)
- X•i = resource value

Choosing the correct model form

Linear model: 1 to 4 resources

- 1 Resource:
- Yi = B0 + B1X1i + εi

- 4 Resources:
- Yi = B0 + B1X1i + B2X2i + B3X3i + B4X4i
- + B12X1iX2i + B13X1iX3i + B14X1iX4i
- + B23X2iX3i + B24X2iX4i + B34X3iX4i
- + B123X1iX2i X3i + B124X1iX2i X4i
- + B134X1iX3i X4i + B234X2iX3i X4i
- + B1234X1iX2i X3i X4i + εi

Number of parameters

required

for…

1 Resource = 2

2 Resource = 4

3 Resource = 8

4 Resource = 16

The statistical model

- Deterministic model structure
- Multiple regression, Logistic

- Model error
- Normal, Poisson, Binomial

- Model selection
- Parsimony (AIC), Bonferroni’s alpha, Statistical significance

Poisson error

Repeated samples of individuals randomly dispersed are Poisson-distributed

Poisson error

Negative-binomial error

Normal error

Binomial error

The statistical model

- Deterministic model structure
- Multiple regression, Logistic

- Model error
- Normal, Poisson, Binomial

- Model selection
- Parsimony (AIC), Bonferroni’s alpha, Statistical significance

Model Selection

- Use AIC to judge the best of several trial models
- The ‘best’ model must be statistically significant from the ‘null’ model to be accepted

If =0.05, then Bonferroni’s adjusted is:

1 Resource = 0.0500 2 Resource = .0169

3 Resource = 0.0073 4 Resource = 0.0034

True, Valid and Misleading Models

- If the ‘True’ model is: Yi = B0 + B123X1iX2i X3i
- Then:
- Yi = B0 + B3X3i is a ‘Valid’ model
- Yi = B0 + B12X1i X2i is a ‘Valid’ model
- Yi = B0 + B4X4i is a ‘Misleading’ model
- Yi = B0 + B14X1i X4i is a ‘Misleading’ model

1 Resource Required - 1 Resource Queried

Success identifying ‘True’ Model

Logistic-Poisson

Multiple Regression - Normal

1 Resource Required - 1 Resource Queried

Success identifying ‘True’ Model

Logistic-Poisson

Logistic-Binomial

4 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

Medium SP - Resources uncorrelated – 100% detection - Full

True

Valid

Misleading

4 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

High SP - Resources uncorrelated – 100% detection - Full

True

Valid

Misleading

4 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

Low SP - Resources uncorrelated – 100% detection - Full

True

Valid

Misleading

1 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

Medium SP - Resources uncorrelated – 100% detection - Full

True / Valid

Misleading

1 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

High SP - Resources uncorrelated – 100% detection - Full

True / Valid

Misleading

1 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

Low SP - Resources uncorrelated – 100% detection - Full

True / Valid

Misleading

1 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

Medium SP - Resources 50% correlated – 100% detection - Full

True / Valid

Misleading

1 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

Medium SP - Resources 50% correlated – 25% detection - Full

True / Valid

Misleading

1 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

Medium SP - Resources 50% correlated - 25% detection - 50% Full

True / Valid

Misleading

1 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

High SP - Resources 50% correlated – 25% detection – 50% Full

True / Valid

Misleading

1 Resources Required - 4 Resources Queried

Medium SP - Resources 95% correlated – 25% detection - Full

True / Valid

Misleading

Technical Conclusions

- A-priori hypotheses concerning species-habitat associations are essential
- Required resources should be amalgamated by suite
- Resource contrast is essential and should be planned:
- Ratio of ‘between-point:within-point’ variability must be increased for both resources and species-of-interest
- Point-count method must be designed with spatial period considerations in mind

Key Conservation Conclusion

At best:

Affirmative conclusions about the importance of ‘critical resources’ based on statistical correlations alone are not justified!

At worst:

Affirmative conclusions about the importance of ‘critical resources’ based on statistical correlations alone, and without documenting the spatial characteristics of the landscape etc., are completely indefensible!