1 / 9

Presented by: Don Lehner

Presented by: Don Lehner. NAVSEA TMDE Program Fleet Review May 2009 CNSL Consolidated TMDE Readiness Assessment (CTRA). LANT CTRA Processes. CTRA Program Support CTRA Center Redistribution TMDE Procurement Support MCMS/SISCAL Updates Daily Fleet Support Future Potential.

heidi
Download Presentation

Presented by: Don Lehner

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presented by: Don Lehner NAVSEA TMDE Program Fleet Review May 2009 CNSL Consolidated TMDE Readiness Assessment (CTRA)

  2. LANT CTRA Processes • CTRA Program Support • CTRA Center Redistribution • TMDE Procurement Support • MCMS/SISCAL Updates • Daily Fleet Support • Future Potential

  3. CTRA Program Support Test Equipment and/or Installed Instrumentation Pre-CTRA data gathering and prep SPETERL, MCMS, TCR, MIQ, CDMD, CRL Onboard CTRA Prime System and FSTER validation Test equipment inventory and bar coding Excess, deficiency, and obsolete resolution Shipboard training (critical due to turnover/recurring) Post CTRA Recall database updates (MCMS, TCR, MIQ) SPETERL change requests to NSWC Earle Data to RMCs (CDMD-OA ), NAVSEA (UID) and SSES (CRL) Results and questionnaire with revised SPETERL Tracking of unfilled deficiencies and metrics Done every two years with periodic tech assists FY08 RESULTS: • 37 CTRAs • 793 excess removed • 527 deficiencies filled • $170K estimated cal • cost avoided • 1,563 recall additions • 2,349 recall deletions • 4,352 recall updates Onboard validation and training provides an accurate picture of TE status and increases confidence in Cal readiness %

  4. CTRA Center Redistribution • Equipment Receipt • Onboard CTRAs and daily transactions • Seal Beach annual outfitting • Decommissioning • Equipment Redistribution • Fill CTRA deficiencies and obsolete items • Replacement of BER assets • Navy Wide distribution • GPETE and Cal Standards • DRMO or ATAC transfers • Products • Equipment transfers • Bar coding of assets • High value/low availability assets for repair • Asset research to keep valid equipment • RRAM/VRAM • Approval process dependent on Command • Metrics FY08 RESULTS: • 4,222 Received • 1,781 Issued • 2,420 DRMO/ATAC • $2.8M Cost Avoidance Cost effective utilization of fleet assets to support maintenance requirements

  5. TMDE Procurement Support • Requirements Analysis • Screen initial recommendations • Compare to known requirements • Revise to meet fleet needs • Receipt and Validation • Receive and stage at CTRA Center • Validate latest ship requirements before transfer • Identify replacement candidates • Screen during CTRAs • Coordinate transfer with ships • 111 issued in FY08 • Transfer and Tracking • Transfer equipment and coordinate exchanges • Continually screen inventories for replacements • Data provided to NSWC Earle for CDMD-OA updates Procurement process provides necessary technical refresh of test equipment and improves the test equipment posture of the fleet

  6. MCMS/SISCAL Updates MCMS Initialization Compare CRL to baseline TCR data Convert test equipment, portable tools, and installed instrumentation data prior to MCMS installs Update data to latest known configuration Validation of unmatched records MCMS Support Receive fleet input and forward to MCMS Help Desk Update data in MCMS when required Process TYCOM and Tech Authority approvals SISCAL Updates Update SISCAL data in MCMS after SISCAL data posted to SISCAL web Support discrepancy resolution between MCMS and SISCAL data and tracks post-CRL update requirements SISCAL update process supports automated data collection by Teams with no impact to ship or SISCAL evolution

  7. Daily Fleet Support • TYCOM/Ship Requests • Email or phone call requests • Deficiency resolution and historical data repository • Tech Assists (onboard, email or phone) • LANT central SPETERL/TMDEI request point • Coordination • Support offered to ships under 85% cal readiness • History of requirements analysis • Standardized SPETERL validation • Loan Pool maintenance • RMC interface and barcoding • Database Maintenance • Reference file for CTRA Process and CTRA Center (combines key elements of TMDEI, METPRO, CDMD-OA, Asset Details, and LOGICOM cost data) • SCAT Reference file of known test equipment issues Daily support is often unscheduled and directly relates to all other areas of the CTRA process

  8. Future Potential LANT JFMM PAC • Standardized reference file sharing • Asset screening improvements • On line TMDEI and SPETERLs • Identification of process improvement steps • Analysis of unfilled deficiencies • Evaluate pattern from TYCOM actions • Confidence measurement for cal readiness • Increase application of UID functionality KEY BENEFITS Common Processes For: • CTRAs • Equipment Requests • Validations • Data Integrity • Confidence Continuous improvement to support the changing environment is built on proven best practices

  9. CNSL TMDE ProgramPOC’s Questions/Answers Johnnie Cleveland CNSL N43/6C8 Office: 757-836-3296 johnnie.cleveland@navy.mil Don Lehner McKean Defense Group, LLC Office: 757-301-6567 Cell: 757-672-6920 dlehner@mckean-defense.com

More Related