Catalyzing Maternal and Child Health Results by Paying for Performance: Evidence from Developing Countries. Catherine Connor and Rena Eichler Health Systems 20/20 Project. 15 November 2010 Health Systems Research Symposium. Feasibility of Insurance Design and Implementation.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Catalyzing Maternal and Child Health Results by Paying for Performance: Evidence from Developing Countries
Catherine Connor and Rena Eichler
Health Systems 20/20 Project
15 November 2010
Health Systems Research Symposium
Feasibility of Insurance Design and Implementation
Monitoring and Evaluation
Pay providers for quality or efficiency
Incentives to use priority services
Incentives to cover hard-to-reach populations
What is Pay for Performance?
Highlights from on-line survey of country experiences
Expanding access for maternal and child health results: the case of Burundi
What we mean by P4P
Donars. Govenment, NGOs
Health Programs, Insurers
Funds, Goods, Other
Patients or Families
Service Providers (facility or health worker)
NGO or program implementer
Government - Local or National
Many terms: results-based financing, performance-based financing, performance-based contracting, conditional cash transfers, …
One common definition:
*From the Center for Global Development Working Group on Performance-Based Incentives
Why is P4P getting so much attention?
Why do this survey?
To fill the gap between growing experimentation and little documentation
Global online survey 2009
25 responses summarized
14 longer case studies in 2010
Maternal health results dominate (22/25).
Child health results also top priority (14/25).
Infectious (e.g. HIV/AIDS, malaria) and non-communicable diseases (e.g. cancer screening, diabetes and asthma management) included but less frequent
Primary care facilities
Rural or peri-urban areas
Demand side (users/patients) - vouchers and transportation subsidies
Increasing attempts to reward quality
Survey results: Designs to expand access
BURUNDIPublic-private purchasing to increase use of priority services and improve quality
1. Kaneza 2007; 2.http://healthsystems2020.healthsystemsdatabase.org/
P4P Purchasing – how it works
Monthly payments fee for service
quarterly bonus for quality
Burundi Results – Kibuye Province
Reports related to this presentation
are available at www.HS2020.org