1 / 28

Six Months Later: American Attitudes and Beliefs Changed by 9/11

Michael W. Traugott The University of Michigan Reactions to Terrorism: Attitudes and Anxieties Washington DC June 18, 2002. Six Months Later: American Attitudes and Beliefs Changed by 9/11.

Download Presentation

Six Months Later: American Attitudes and Beliefs Changed by 9/11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Michael W. Traugott The University of Michigan Reactions to Terrorism: Attitudes and Anxieties Washington DC June 18, 2002 Six Months Later: American Attitudes and Beliefs Changed by 9/11

  2. Beginning on the afternoon of September 11, a multidisciplinary group of ISR researchers assembled to consider how they could contribute to an understanding of the impact of the attacks on the World Trade Center. The group included economists, political scientists, psychologists, sociologists, demographers, and survey methodologists.We decided that fielding a longitudinal study to measure attitudes and behaviors and how they were related – and disseminating the findings widely – would be an appropriate and useful contribution.

  3. MAIN HYPOTHESES H: Symptoms of stress would increase in both the short and longer term H: Support for restrictions in civil liberties would increase in exchange for greater personal security. These attitudes would be sustained until perceived safety and security returned H: Stereotyping of minority groups would increase, especially for groups connected to the events

  4. DESIGN OF THE HAR SURVEY A list-assisted sample was drawn for a national sample of telephone households. The Wave 1 field period started on September 17 and ran until October 17, with the bulk of interviewing completed by October 8. The final N was 752. The Wave 2 interviewing began on March 11, and the field period ended April 16. The final N was 613 recontacts and 151 new RDD respondents.

  5. RESULTS The analysis presented here focuses on four main areas: 1. Personal reactions to the attacks 2. Psychological responses to the attacks 3. Effects on children and families 4. Attitudes about civil liberties and anti-terrorism measures

  6. REACTIONS TO THE ATTACKS

  7. The Attacks Have Affected People’s Sense of Safety and Security

  8. The Recontact Interviews Suggest Little Has Changed

  9. Gender Differences in Perception of Safety and SecurityThese differences do not appear by race or age

  10. Americans Followed the News about the Attacks Closely

  11. Americans Are Not Following the News about the “War on Terrorism” as Closely How Closely Have You Been Following the News about the “War

  12. Attention to the News Is Related to a Lowered Sense of Safety

  13. How Do the September 11 Attacks Compare to Other Events?

  14. Americans Are Concerned About Further Attacks, More So Elsewhere than in Their Own Community

  15. Americans Believe the Chances of a Bioterrorism Attack Are High, More So Elsewhere than in Their Own Community

  16. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO THE ATTACKS

  17. Comparison of Depressive Symptoms over Time

  18. Sense of Personal Safety and Security Is Related to Symptoms of Depression

  19. Levels of Depression in the Population Are Declining Slightly

  20. Feelings of Mastery Are Increasing Slightly

  21. EFFECTS ON CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

  22. Parents Report that Children Experienced Elevated Levels of Anxiety

  23. Altered Perceptions of Safety and Security Related to Presence of Children

  24. ATTITUDES ABOUT CIVIL LIBERTIES

  25. Sustained Security Loss Related to Greater Support for Anti-Terror Policies

  26. Favorability Assessments of American Ethnic Groups Are Higher than Recently These evaluations have not changed across the last six months

  27. Favorability of Ethnic Groups in the United States and Overseas These evaluations have not changed across the past six months.

  28. CONCLUSIONS The impact of the attacks on 9/11 has been relatively severe and durable Adult Americans are coping personally, but the greater damage may be to civil society and confidence in institutions Americans’ loss of a sense of personal safety and security persists and is complicated by the difficulty of the government: 1. Keeping the country on alert to minimize harm 2. Defining a clear “result” in the “war on terrorism” that the public understands and can accept 3. Producing a satisfactory “result” on a timely basis in what is described as a protracted effort

More Related