1 / 41

RatSLAM on the Edge: Revealing a Coherent Representation from an Overloaded Rat Brain

RatSLAM on the Edge: Revealing a Coherent Representation from an Overloaded Rat Brain. Michael Milford, David Prasser , and Gordon Wyeth Folami alamudun graduate Student Computer science & engineering Texas a&m university. OUTLINE. Overview RatSLAM Experience Mapping

heath
Download Presentation

RatSLAM on the Edge: Revealing a Coherent Representation from an Overloaded Rat Brain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. RatSLAM on the Edge: Revealing a Coherent Representation from an Overloaded Rat Brain Michael Milford, David Prasser, and Gordon Wyeth Folamialamudun graduate Student Computer science & engineering Texas a&m university

  2. OUTLINE Overview RatSLAM Experience Mapping Goal Recall Using Experience Maps Experiment Results Discussion

  3. OVERVIEW • In order for a robot to navigate intelligently : • It must possess a means of acquiring and storing information about past experiences; and • It must possess the ability to use make decisions based on this information.

  4. OVERVIEW • What is SLAM? • Simultaneous Localization and Mapping • Determine the state of the world: • What does the world look like? • Determine location in the observed world: • Where in the world am I? Where in the world…?

  5. OUTLINE Overview RatSLAM Experience Mapping Goal Recall Using Experience Maps Experiment Results Discussion

  6. ratSLAM Why are we SLAM-ing? Maps are used to depict the environment for an overview and to determine location within the perceived environment. Locating and mapping under conditions of errors and of noise is very complex. Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM).

  7. ratSLAM Inspired by computational models of hippocampus in rodents. Hippocampus is a part of the brain that plays an important role in long-term memory and spatial navigation Neurons in the rat and mouse hippocampus respond as place cells. Place cells exhibit a high rate of firing whenever an animal is in a location in an environment corresponding to the cell's "place field" Place Field arepatterns of neural activity that correspond to locations in space

  8. ratSLAM RatSLAM is an implementation of a hippocampal model of robot control: To provide a new and effective method for the mobile robot problem of (SLAM); and To reproduce a high-level brain function in a robot in order to increase the understanding of memory and learning in mammals.

  9. ratSLAM Architecture for RatSLAM. Local View and Pose Cell arrangement for artificial landmarks

  10. ratSLAM – Local View Local View (LV): A form of representation processed from vision information from camera images Calibrates the robot’s state information Stored and associated with the currently active pose cells. If familiar, the current visual scene also causes activity to be injected into the pose cells associated with the currently active LV cells.

  11. ratSLAM – Pose Cell Θ` y` x` 3-D pose cell model. Each dimension corresponds to one of the three state variables of a ground-based robot

  12. ratSLAM – Pose Cell Pose Cell: A three-dimensional structured competitive attractor neural network. Combines the characteristics of place and head-direction cells Each axis of the structure corresponds to a different state variable, x′, y′ and θ′

  13. ratSLAM How it works: Wheel encoder information is used to perform path integration by shifting the current pose cell activity. Vision information is converted into a local view. Local view cell is associated with the currently active pose cells. If familiar, activity is injected into the particular pose cells associated with the currently active local view cells.

  14. ratSLAM – Pose Cell The first test environment was a two by two metre arena

  15. ratSLAM – Pose Cell Floor plan and robot trajectory for initial goal navigation experiments.

  16. ratSLAM – Pose Cell The temporal map cells after recall of the first goal.

  17. ratSLAM – Pose Cell The path the robot followed to reach the first goal.

  18. ratSLAM Hashing collisions in the Pose Cells: Vision information starts to cause more frequent loop closures. Leads to discontinuities in the pose cell matrix. Multiple representations of the same physical areas in the environment. Clusters of pose cells become associated with more than one pose. Hashing collisions within pose cells are unavoidable.

  19. ratSLAM Floor plan of large indoor environment

  20. ratSLAM Dominant packet path for a 40 × 20 × 36 pose cell matrix.

  21. ratSLAM Temporal map for the large indoor environment

  22. OUTLINE Overview RatSLAM Experience Mapping Goal Recall Using Experience Maps Experiment Results Discussion

  23. EXPERIENCE MAPPING Experience mapping algorithm is the creation and maintenance of a collection of experiences and inter-experience links.  This produces a spatially continuous map without collisions from the messy representations found in the pose cells. It does this by combining information from the pose cells with the Local View cells and the robot's current behavior

  24. EXPERIENCE MAPPING Experience map co-ordinate space

  25. EXPERIENCE MAPPING Experience Mapping: The algorithm uses output from pose cells and local view cells to create an experience map. A graph-like map containing nodes (experiences) and links between experiences. Each node represents a snapshot of the activity within pose cells and local view cells. New experience nodes is created as needed.

  26. EXPERIENCE MAPPING Experience Generation • Each experience has its own (x′, y′, θ′, V ). • where x’, y’, and ′ are the three state variables. • V describes the visual scene associated with the experience. • Output from the pose cells and local view cells is used to create a map made up of robot experiences. • Inter-experience links store temporal, behavioral, and odometric information about the robot's movement between experiences.

  27. EXPERIENCE MAPPING Experience zone of influence: Activity is dependent on how close the activity peaks in the pose cells and local view cells are to the cells associated with the experience.

  28. EXPERIENCE MAPPING x'PC, ,YPC and θ' - coordinates of the dominant activity packet, x'i, yI, and θ‘ - coordinates of the associated experience i, ra is the zone constant for the (x',y') plane, and 0a is the zone constant for the 0' dimension.

  29. EXPERIENCE MAPPING Experience zone Visual scene V is the current visual scene. Vi is the visual scene associate with experience i. Ex’y’θ’is the visual scene energy component.

  30. EXPERIENCE MAPPING Total Energy Level: Total Energy level of Experience Ei: Ei= EV × (Exy + Eθ)

  31. EXPERIENCE MAPPING Experience Mapping: As the robot moves around a novel environment, it needs to generate experiences to form a representation of the world. Learning of new experiences is triggered not only by exploring in new areas of an environment, but also by visual changes in areas the robot has already explored.

  32. OUTLINE Overview RatSLAM Experience Mapping GoalRecall Using Experience Maps Experiment Results Discussion

  33. GOAL RECOLLECTION Experience Transitions: Transitions represent the physical movement of the robot in the world as it moves from one experience to another.

  34. GOAL RECOLLECTION Experience Transitions: dpij is a vector describing the position and orientation of experience j relative to experience i.

  35. GOAL RECOLLECTION Map Correction: Discrepancies between a transition's odometric information and the linked experiences' coordinates are minimized through a process of map correction:

  36. OUTLINE Overview RatSLAM Experience Mapping Goal Recall Using Experience Maps Experiment Results Discussion

  37. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

  38. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

  39. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

  40. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

  41. DISCUSSION • Experience maps are localized: • Cartesian properties are not guaranteed beyond local area • For instance straight corridors may be slightly curved in the experience map.

More Related