logixml vs data discovery vendors
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
LogiXML vs. Data Discovery vendors

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 6

LogiXML vs. Data Discovery vendors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 80 Views
  • Uploaded on

LogiXML vs. Data Discovery vendors. Author : Patricia Quigley BI Use Cases Beyond Visualization including: Dashboarding , Reporting, Analysis, Alerting, and Workflow Embeddability : Seamlessly embed reports and dashboards into applications and portals, increasing user adoption

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' LogiXML vs. Data Discovery vendors' - hayley


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
logixml vs data discovery vendors
LogiXMLvs. Data Discovery vendors
  • Author: Patricia Quigley
  • BI Use Cases Beyond Visualization including:
    • Dashboarding, Reporting, Analysis, Alerting, and Workflow
  • Embeddability:
    • Seamlessly embed reports and dashboards into applications and portals, increasing user adoption
  • Strong UI integration with other web based applications
  • Support for traditional tabular reporting with ability to export data to PDFs, word documents, etc.
  • Security integration with existing security stores such as Active Directory, LDAP and others
  • Deploy reports/dashboards to large audiences with no user-based license fees. 
logixml vs microsoft
LogiXML vs. Microsoft
  • Author: Patricia Quigley
  • Development Effort:
    • Unique “Elemental Design” allows you to rapidly build sophisticated BI applications without writing code
  • Unified Platform:
    • Built entirely on a single technology base, not separate products/technologies
  • Data Access:
    • Report on data from any data source or data model
  • Workflow:
    • Completely integrated scheduling, process and alert functionality 
  • Browser Neutrality:
    • Works on any web browser
  • BI Delivery and Interactivity:
    • 100% browser based BI delivery with wide range of interactive charts & reports
logixml vs dundas xcelsius
LogiXMLvs. Dundas & Xcelsius

Author: Patricia Quigley

Dundas:

  • BI Use Cases beyond dashboarding including:  Reporting, Analysis, Alerting, and Workflow
  • Support for traditional tabular reporting with ability to export data to PDFs, word documents, etc.

Xcelsius:

  • Deploy reports/dashboards to large audiences with no user-based license fees, highly scalable

Both:

  • Write-back to operation data stores
  • Connectivity to any data source with realtime data access, no reliance on data warehouse or meta data layer
  • Embeddability: Seamlessly embed reports and dashboards into applications and portals, increasing user adoption
  • Mobile Support –  can be used on a wide variety of mobile devices w/o writing additional code, including iPads, tablets, iPhones, Droids
  • Security integration with existing security stores such as Active Directory, LDAP and others
inetsoftware
INetSoftware

Author: John Hight

  • I know this company (inetsoftware.de) - have worked with their CEO, TorstenKlose.
    • They started out in the JDBC driver business. 
    • Then grew into BI by targeting Crystal Reports customers with a Java based solution (initially, cleverly named Crystal Clear Reports, now simply i-net Clear Reports). 
    • They now have a .NET version of Clear Reports, as well.
  • Potentially weaknesses
    • They are a relatively, small company. 
      • Less than 20 the last time I spoke with Torsten.
    • When I last checked, they only offer German business hour support via email.
      • But, they are very responsive (based on past experience)
    • If you are talking to a .NET shop, you can throw the reverse FUD that Java shops throw at us
    • They are cheap (https://www.inetsoftware.de/store) .  You buy in the web store on credit card.  
    • They have no real sales team outside of Torsten. 
    • Which could also create a lack of support
inetsoft
InetSoft

A brief summary: Author Tawnya Johnson

  • Potential Strengths
    • They may be more attractive to Java shops because of the architecture
    • If data integration is required,  they will be stronger than Logi
    • Great self-service capabilities than Ad-Hoc
  • Potential Weaknesses
    • Pricing and Packaging…not just price level but look at all the different components that they offer that you may be forced to buy (see yellow box below)
    • No mobile support
    • Too many different development environments/tools to learn…we just have one…Studio
    • They don’t have an ETL product
birst swot
BirstSWOT
  • Break Down from a customer call: Author Brett McKinnon
  • Strength
    • Filters for Mulit-Tenant/ Roles etc.
    • Over all look and feel is good
    • Chart interactivity
    • Just received 26M in VC funds
  • Weakness
    • Nothing like the Analysis Grid (or the sales rep got lazy)
    • Flash for mobile reports
  • Pricing Options
    • Concurrent user pricing
    • Named user license
    • Subscription deals in one-year increments, month-to-month
ad