Rapid ethical appraisal in action
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 17

Rapid Ethical Appraisal in Action PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 77 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Fasil Tekola 1,2 , Jonas Kengne 3 , Susan Bull 4 , Bobbie Farsides 1 , Melanie Newport 1 , Samuel Wanji 3 , Mossy Foot Treatment and Prevention Association 5 , Gail Davey 1 1 Brighton and Sussex Medical School, UK 2 School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Download Presentation

Rapid Ethical Appraisal in Action

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Rapid ethical appraisal in action

Fasil Tekola1,2, Jonas Kengne3, Susan Bull4, Bobbie Farsides1, Melanie Newport1, Samuel Wanji3, Mossy Foot Treatment and Prevention Association5, Gail Davey1

1Brighton and Sussex Medical School, UK

2School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

3Research Foundation in Tropical Diseases and Environment, Buea, Cameroon

4The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, UK

5Mossy Foot Research Project, Soddo, Ethiopia

Rapid Ethical Appraisal in Action


Genetic susceptibility to podoconiosis

Genetic susceptibility to podoconiosis


Challenges

Challenges

  • Explaining complex genetics research to communities will little formal education

  • Guidelines focus on individual-based consent but family members become part of the study without their consent

  • Podo families are stigmatised as a result of the genetic nature of the condition: external research interest may heighten stigma


Rapid ethical appraisal in action

Study sites


Study design

Study Design

  • In-depth interviews with various stakeholders including:

    • researchers

    • fieldworkers

    • Staff of local NGOs (MFTPA & MVIFAD*)

    • Community leaders

    • Community members

  • Focus group discussions with community members

  • Two sites in Ethiopia and Cameroon

*Mossy Foot Treatment and Prevention Association

Mbebah Vigilantic Farming and Development Association


Rapid ethical appraisal in action

Sitting in my house God sent this organization [MFTPA] for me and I am now very well. Now I can comfortably walkand work. [Female participant]


Themes

Themes

  • Basic knowledge of the concept of research

  • Language, content and comprehension of information provided

  • Perceptions of informed consent

  • Factors facilitating or hindering recruitment to research

  • Preferred approaches and communication style with the community including authority structures


Basic knowledge of the concepts of research and informed consent

Basic knowledge of the concepts of research and informed consent

“It helps us relieve from our suffering; it will give us rest from this day and night burning disease” (community member E)

“Research is a process through which observations and investigations are made in order to discover, to find out something” (community member C)

“I think to come and take part in this work; we need to know the reason of the study; to know the objectives, and to be sure that you people are doing the right thing” (community member C)

“Research and health care are not the same. As health comes up after research to care or treat a patient” (Male Community member C)


Factors facilitating or hindering recruitment to research

Factors facilitating or hindering recruitment to research

  • Views of family, neighbours, community

  • Language & forms

  • Absence of a cure - a curse from God

  • Stigma

  • Confidentiality

  • Trust – who is asking them to consent?


Stigma

Stigma

“Previously even my friend was spitting on me when my legs were swollen and smelling bad”

They see people from leg to head, not up down. A healthy person never likes to marry a podoconiosis patient.

“It is better to die than catching this disease because it keeps you at home so that you starve and thirst while you are alive”


Disclosure of personal health information

Disclosure of Personal Health Information

“I am not happy when other people know about my disease. Why should I tell people who undermine? Why should I make those people laugh at me? I tell people like you because I can be helped and cured” (Female community member E)

“They (MFTPA) also keep our secret that is why right now I am telling you the truth” (Male community member E)

“No, I will not mind somebody to know my illness provided he/she will be secretive. Any medical personnel can check my illness” (male community member C)


Preferred approaches and communication style with the community

Preferred approaches and communication style with the community

“…people rely on the traditional council and the traditional council is under the Fon. So when you contact the Fon and the traditional council, the people will know that it is something good” (Health worker C)

“The family head should give consent because he is the custodian of the family and if anything happens to any member of the family he is the one to answer any questions that will come after it.” (male community member C)

“Usually, for research that involves any family member, particularly children, the father gives permission, as males are usually head of households. However, your study is sensitive. It supposes genetic transmission within a family. If I decide on behalf of my child, she may be disappointed one day when she grows old if the study touches the pride of her family” (Female community member E)


Rapid ethical appraisal in action

“...it is clear that it is the father who always takes the decision, but that does not mean that he is always right. Sometimes, the father may say ‘no’ but after arguing with him (convincing him), he can change his decision.” Adult female community member C)

“I don’t think somebody should decide for me now, so anything concerning consent or research should be determined and decided by me because I am old enough now to know what is good for me.” Young male community member C)


Recommendations

Recommendations

  • Build on words, narratives and metaphors used in the community: avoid technical language

  • Use non-verbal materials e.g. videos

  • Focus on issues of most interest to participants – e.g. the benefits, issues of confidentiality

  • Develop a relationship with prospective participants showing them respect and a desire to help

  • Work in partnership with those who are trusted and respected by the community

    • e.g. NGO such as MFTPA or authority structures identified by the community

  • Test comprehension of participant to ensure ‘true voluntariness’


Hierarchical informed consent process

Hierarchical informed consent process

Ethiopia process Cameroon

Group discussion, sensitization, introduction of researchers, follow up,

random selection, recruitment criteria

MFTPA

Head of Kebele

Church leaders

Health Centre

Fon

Quarter Head

Head of Household

Family

Head of Household

Individual Consent,

Sample collection

Member of Household

Member of Household


Discussion points

Discussion points

  • Some common themes identified

  • Also important differences - no ‘one size fits all’

    • Related to previous research experience, local support groups

    • Need to undertake REA in research-naïve communities or when undertaking complex studies such as genetics or clinical trials


  • Login