Photon angular momentum and geometric gauge. Margaret Hawton, Lakehead University Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada William Baylis, U. of Windsor, Canada. Outline. photon r operators and their localized eigenvectors leads to transverse bases and geometric gauge transformations,
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Margaret Hawton, Lakehead University
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
William Baylis, U. of Windsor, Canada
pz or z
pxNotation: momentum space
In quantum mechanics, any observable requires a Hermitian operator
a =1/2 for F=E+icB ~ p1/2 as in QED to normalize
last term maintains transversality of rP(F)
but the components of rP don’t commute!
thus “the photon is not localizable”?
Is there a photon position operator with commuting components and exactly localized eigenvectors?
It has been claimed that since the early day of quantum mechanics that there is not.
Surprisingly, we found a family of r operators,
Hawton, Phys. Rev. A 59, 954 (1999).
Hawton and Baylis, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012101 (2001).
and, not surprisingly, some are sceptical!
p components and z
its components commute
eigenvectors are exactly localized states
it depends on “geometric gauge”, c,that is on choice of transverse basis
Like a gauge transformation in E&M components and
Topology: You can’t comb the hair on a fuzz ball without creating a screw dislocation.
Phase discontinuity at origin gives d-function string when differentiated.
Geometric gauge transformation creating a
no +z singularity
q=p creating a
Is the physics creating a c-dependent?
Localized basis states depend on choice of c, e.g. el(0) or el(-f) localized eigenvectors look physically different in terms of their vortices.
This has been given as a reason that our position operator may be invalid.
The resolution lies in understanding the role ofangular momentum (AM). Note: orbital AM rxp involves photon position.
For an exactly localized state creating a
Any field can be expanded in plane wave using the transverse basis determined by c:
f(p) will be called the (expansion) coefficient. For F describing a specific physical state, change of el(c) must be compensated by change in f.
Optical angular momentum (AM) creating a
Interpretation for helicity creating a l=1, single valued, dislocation on -ve z-axis
sz=1, lz= 0
sz= -1, lz= 2
sz=0, lz= 1
Basis has uncertain spin and orbital AM, definitejz=1.
Position space creating a
Beams creating a
Any Fourier expansion of the fields must make use of sometransverse basis to write
and the theory of geometric gaugetransformations presented so far in the context of exactly localized states applies - in particular it applies to optical beams.
Some examples involving beams follow:
The basis vectors contribute orbital AM. creating a
Elimination of creating a e2if term requires linear combination of RH and LH helicity basis states.
Partition of creating a J between basis and coefficient
Dc to rotate axis is also possible, but inconvenient.
Commutation relations creating a
L(c) is a true angular momentum.
Confirms that localized photon has a definite z-component of total angular momentum.