1 / 21

Rail Freight In Relief of Roadway Congestion

Rail Freight In Relief of Roadway Congestion. NCHRP 8-42 Talking Freight March, 2007. Carl Martland. NCHRP 8-42 STUDY. Purpose: road congestion relief. Surrounding issues inevitably broader. Three Objectives:. Expand Scope of Public Planning Processes

hardie
Download Presentation

Rail Freight In Relief of Roadway Congestion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rail Freight In Relief of Roadway Congestion NCHRP 8-42 Talking Freight March, 2007 Carl Martland

  2. NCHRP 8-42 STUDY Purpose: road congestion relief • Surrounding issues inevitably broader Three Objectives: • Expand Scope of Public Planning Processes • Improve Methods to Identify and Assess Solutions • Cultivate Public-Private and Public-Public Cooperation Study Products: • Guidebook (Volume I) • Final Report (Volume II)

  3. RAIL FREIGHT IN RELIEF OF ROADWAY CONGESTION Rail relief of roads is viable • Road planners need to know it Clear ways to judge and proceed • 8-42 Study products show how Biggest barriers not market barriers • Institutional and capital priorities

  4. CONVERGING INTERESTS PUBLIC: • Alternatives diminishing, multi-modal options desirable • Supply capacity any effective way • Freight functions as a system • Rail is most prominent alternative • Multiple public benefits PRIVATE: • Constrained rail ability to finance capital improvements • Capital intensive industry more receptive to public investment • Aids Cost of Capital and ROI gap (Virtuous Cycle)

  5. NEEDS Public agencies pay scant attention to rail freight • Result: narrow experiential base, limited scope for action Railway’s situation analogous for public planning Both parties need to forge new partnerships • Aided by systematic approaches to analyze and implement rail options

  6. EXAMPLES OF RAIL FREIGHT OPTIONS

  7. FACTORS AFFECTING FEASIBILITY Private Sector vs. Public Sector Planning • Different perspectives on freight Needs for Better Tools and Methods • Public Investment Planning Processes • Approach for multi-modal planning • Methods for Assessing Issues & Solutions • Approach for identifying options • Public-Private Cooperation • Roles of service providers and shippers

  8. PUBLIC-PRIVATE RELATIONSHIPS Actions to aid relationship development • Cooperation First • Distribution of Roles • Collaborative Dispute Resolution

  9. DRAWING SUPPORT: PRIVATE PRIORITY When capital & capacity both scarce, good traffic gives way to better: • Driven by growth in import containers • Public benefits not in private calculation Solution: put public capital on the table • Changes comparison • Improves return • Expands capital pool

  10. Ways to Affect Public Program Priority DRAWING SUPPORT: PUBLIC PRIORITY REFORMULATION in freight terms 111111111111 CONTAINMENT of worsening congestion111111 BROADER CRITERIA appealing to voters:11111 • Economic development • Safety (traffic separation)

  11. T r a i n s Railroad Private P u b l I c DRAWING SUPPORT: COALITIONS Multi-Party Investment: • Public: Track & terminals • Private Operators: Equipment & terminals • Both: Train starts affecting crew & power • Railroads contribute everywhere, including national fleets & network

  12. APPLICABLE SITUATIONS • Traffic growth seems to require extensive highway capacity investment. • Over-reliance on trucks leads to severe congestion. • Rail network structure restricts role of rail. • Rail network structure restricts role of highways. • Freight users are too small or scattered for efficient use of rail. • Regional economic development is threatened by lack of goods movement.

  13. DECISION-MAKING PROCESS Identify ApplicableRail Freight Solutions Perspective of Planners Perspective of Decision-Makers Alternatives to be Evaluated Social and Econ Impacts Effectiveness of Rail Freight Pub/Pvt Benefit/Cost; Shipper Acceptance Funding and Implementation Plans

  14. POLICY MECHANISMS • Project Finance of Capacity Expansion • Public Ownership of Right-of-Way • Redevelopment of Rail Facilities • Taxation Relief and Incentives • Finance Reform – equality by mode • Land Grants and land swaps • Support of Light Density Lines

  15. 3-PHASE ANALYSIS APPROACH 1. Preliminary Assessment of Feasibility • Q: Can rail help relieve congestion? • Use simple sketch planning tools 2. Detailed Analysis • Q: Do benefits justify the costs? • Use traffic diversion and benefit models 3. Decision-Making • Q: Is this project better than alternatives? • Use benefit/cost and multi-criteria analysis

  16. EVALUATION PROCESS Traffic Activity Forecast Truck & rail freight movements Current & future hwy delay patterns • Costs: • Current Congestion • Future without change • Future with new plan • Highway & alt. rail plans Categorize problem types (5) Amt of divertible freight Output: Max Econ Feasible Spending

  17. ANALYTIC TOOLS

  18. MULTI-MODAL BENEFIT-COST

  19. PUBLIC MOTIVATIONS Project  Relevance  Motivation  Lessons & Outcomes

  20. CONCLUSIONS • Rail freight can be a viable solution in some cases. • Public investment can enlarge the market that freight rail addresses. • Motor carriers can be allies. Facing labor shortages, truck delays and mounting fuel prices, they can see rail freight as a positive option. • When rail succeeds in winning traffic, it does so with competitive service that also boosts the efficiency of motor carriers. • Public-private partnerships can be appropriate, realistic and valuable for both parties. • Institutional barriers are surmountable.

  21. Contacts: Joseph Bryan, Global Insight: joe.bryan@globalinsight.com Glen Weisbrod, Economic Development Research Group gweisbrod@edrgroup.com Carl Martland martlan@attglobal.net Guide www.trb.org/NotesDocs/NCHRP08-42_Guidebook_Rev10-06.pdf Report www.trb.org/NotesDocs/NCHRP08-42_FR_Rev10-06.pdf

More Related