1 / 29

Gazemarks - Gaze-Based Visual Placeholders to Ease Attention Switching

Gazemarks - Gaze-Based Visual Placeholders to Ease Attention Switching. Tuba AYDIN 30.04.2013. Abstract. Many task require attention switching . Placeholders like as finger , pen ,.. The process of switching attention between displays can be simplified and speed up .

hanzila
Download Presentation

Gazemarks - Gaze-Based Visual Placeholders to Ease Attention Switching

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gazemarks - Gaze-Based Visual Placeholders to EaseAttentionSwitching Tuba AYDIN 30.04.2013

  2. Abstract • Manytaskrequireattentionswitching. • Placeholderslike as finger, pen,.. • Theprocess of switchingattentionbetweendisplays can be simplifiedandspeedup. • Largeandmultiplevisualdisplays. • Limitations. • Visualplaceholder. • Gazemark, visualremainder.

  3. Introduction • Increasinglyricharray of technologies. • Howtodealeffectivelywithmultitasking, switchingfocusandinterruptionsbecome ever moreimportant? • Howenvironmentsmight be structedtokeeptrack of multipleactivitiesoverdifferenttimescales? • Kirshintroducedconcept of entrypoints. • Designerscreateentrypointstodrawpeopleinto an interaction.

  4. Introduction • Dixandco-workersdiscusstherelatedconcepts of triggersandplaceholders. • Kirksdescribesthatcomplementarystrategies can facilitatememory, attentionandperception. • Mechanismsbywhichplaceholdersmight be usedtoeaseattentionswitchingbetweenscreens. • Maincontribution is the concept of Gazemarksto provide visual placeholdersautomaticallytotheuser.

  5. Related Works • Gazetracking • Gaze-basedinteractiontechniques • Multimonitorsetups / largedisplays • Multiplemonitorsfromone PC or laptop • AttentionswitchingandInterruption • Applicationswitching, multitasking

  6. Pilot Study on TheUse of Placeholders • The idea based on thecompementarystrategiesused on thepaperrepresentations. • Participantswere asked to compare a paper list and a digital listpresented on a screen to find out if they used any strategiesto mark a position either onthe paper or on the digital list. • Whatkind of placeholderstrategiestheywoulduse. • A websiteandpaperwith a telephonelistconsisting 40 namesandtelephonenumbers.

  7. Pilot Study on TheUse of Placeholders • Hypothesiswas that people would use fingers, pens orother objects to help keep track of where they were with thepaperlist. • Theresult of thestudyshowedthat; • Participantsusedobjectsorfingersto mark the current line on thepaper. • Participantsalso used a placeholder tokeep track of the position on the display. (cursor, highlighting, rulerorpaper). • Some of participantsdidn’tuseanystrategy to createplaceholders on the lines either on thepaper or on the screen.

  8. Gazemarks • Inbothphysicalanddigitalworldcases the user had to find aplaceholderandactivelymanipulateit. • Visualplaceholders, called Gazemarks, that doesn’t need activemanipulation. • Use of an eye tracker allows a system to beimplemented to remember the last gaze position on ascreenafter visual attention has been switched away.

  9. Gazemarks • Threeessential aspectsin the determination of the last gaze position: • What is the definition of a gaze fixation? • How long is the last conscious gaze fixation? • How can showing a visual placeholder be avoidedaftera blink?

  10. GazeFixation • A gaze on a screen is defined as aset of glances at a region with a specific radius around thefirstglance. • The number of glances at thisregion is counted and after reaching a set threshold theseglances are said to form a gaze.

  11. Lastconsciousgazefixation • Consciousand unconsciousgaze • A fixationstudyto avoid marking unconscious gaze positions. • To find out how long the last conscious gaze fixation.

  12. Lastconsciousgazefixation • A searchtask on the 8” screen. • Animal pictures that were presented on the 42” screen. • The gazes wererecordedon the 8” screenwitheyetracker. • Thelastconscious gaze position has to be longer than 0.13 seconds

  13. Blinking • Blinking is defined as the rapid closing and opening of theeyelid. • Ablink takes approximately 0.3 to 0.4seconds. • Blinksareignored in theGazemarksconcept. • Adelay of 0.6 seconds before the last gazeposition was marked on the screen.

  14. Visualizationoptions • Many different representations could be used to mark thelast gaze position on the screen. • Threedifferentvisualizationoptions : • Flag : Marking a point with a flag or an arrow • Spotlight:Marking a region by drawing a circlearound the last gaze position.Outside the circle therepresentationis grayed-out • Focus area with gradient filter:Marking a regionby drawing a circle around the last gaze positionusing a gradientfilterto illuminate seamless transitionbetween the focusarea and the non-focus area.

  15. Visualizationoptions FlagRepresentation SpotlightRepresentation FocusAreaRepresentation

  16. Visualizationoptions • The three different visual options weredemostratedon an 8”screento 6 participants. • Afterwards participantsfilled out a questionnaire.

  17. Visualizationoptions • Detectingthflagwasdifficult, smalland not easytodistinguishfromthemap background. • Thespotlightprovides a larger focus area and therefore it was easier tofind and they found it more accurate. • The focus area with gradient filter provides a clearfocusandguides the gaze automatically to the last gazepoint. • Theyfound the grayed out areas more distractingandif the position indicated forthe last gaze was not correct it would be much harder tofind information in these dark areas.

  18. Visualizationoptions Implementation • Aprototype of the Gazemarks concept wasimplementedtoresearch reorientingfaster on a screenafterswitchingattention. • The user switches attention between a smalldisplay and a large screen. Hardware • An eyetracker • 42’’ and 8’’ display

  19. Visualizationoptions Software • For the communication between the eye tracker andapplicationutilizedEIToolkit. • EIToolkitexchangemessagesover a general communicationarea, via UDP. Eye-TrackerComponent • Using theeyetracker, an EIToolkit stub thatreceivesdata from the eye tracker, transforms them tonormalizedcoordinates [0,1]wasdeveloped.

  20. Visualizationoptions GazemarkApplication • Theapplication provides two mechanisms for showing the lastgazeposition : • an imageand a transparentwindow on any screen background. • The program registerswith EIToolkit that it listens to eye tracking messages. • Itreceives either valid data [0, 1],or invalid data [-1, -1]. • The last gaze position can becalculated after the program has received invalid data for 0.6 seconds.

  21. Visualizationoptions • 72 invalidvalueand 16 validvaluein the fixation radius around. • Thefixationradius is set to 10% of the width of the screen resolution. • Fixationareawas highlighted by the spotlightrepresentation. • Spotlightis only shown for 3 seconds.

  22. Visualizationoptions Experiment • A user study wasranusing the implemented prototype tocomparetwoconditions : • A search task on a screen without any visual placeholder. • A search task with Gazemarks. Setup • 42’’ and 8’’ screens. • Eyetrackerwhichtrackedglancestowardsthe8” screen.

  23. Visualizationoptions • An attention-switching task with a visual mapsearching task implemented on the small screen. • A textual reasoning task presented on the large screen.

  24. Visualizationoptions Design • The goal of the search task was to findletters on a map. • Afterfindingone of theletters, look away from the small display at the 42” display. • An arrow appeared indicating one of eightdirections. • The userhad to look back at thesmall display, find the same letter againandtelltheexperimenter which number is shown in the indicateddirection. • At the end, participants weregiven a questionnaire and asked to rate aspects of theGazemarkconcept.

  25. Visualizationoptions Results Analysisof searchtimes • Search times in the two conditions were compared. • Participants were found to beconsiderablyfaster in searching for letters on the map with Gazemarks.

  26. Visualizationoptions Analysis of questionnaireresults • Participantslikedthespotlightrepresentation. • The target was faster to find. • Focusleadstheattentiontotheessential. • Ithelpstoorientate. • Itreducesmentalworkload. • Only 1 participant didn’t like the spotlight • Did not notice it or just ignored it.

  27. Visualizationoptions Advantages • Savesthe time andthespeed. • Not havingtorememberthe last position or letter. Disadvantages • The loss of contextual information. • Get annoying after a while.

  28. Discussion • Gazemarks are designed as visual aids ondigital displays to provide these placeholders automaticallyand hence support the user’s attention switching betweendisplays. • Threeapplication domains where Gazemarks may have a role toplay : • Desktopenvironment • Smalldevices / mobile phones • UserInterfaces in cars

  29. Teşekkürler

More Related