1 / 1

Mitigation by CT injection may have a number of advantages

Mitigation by CT injection may have a number of advantages. The injected compact torus (CT) moves quickly Slowest step in CT mitigation is gas-puffing into the injector (~200 s). Bias flux can be provided by permanent magnet

hali
Download Presentation

Mitigation by CT injection may have a number of advantages

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mitigation by CT injection may have a number of advantages • The injected compact torus (CT) moves quickly • Slowest step in CT mitigation is gas-puffing into the injector (~200 s). Bias flux can be provided by permanent magnet • By coordinating MGI and CT timing, core cooling could be precisely controlled • The CT species and velocity can be varied to tailor the penetration depth • Could reduce the total amount of injected gas from the MGI system, making recovery easier • It might also allow for tailoring the shut-down to avoid the “hot-tail” runaways which are common with pellets R. Raman U. Washington • Further advantages if the CT system is operated in a Marshall Gun mode? • A long trailing plasma containing significant neutrals and at amounts >100 times more than the mass of a single CT can be injected • These neutrals would have much higher velocity than what is possible by MGI alone and would penetrate on a faster time scale

More Related