1 / 7

POLICY DEBATE

POLICY DEBATE. Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE. Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best Affirmative: Supports the resolution Negative: Supports the status quo. AFF & NEG Responsibilities.

halee-navarro
Download Presentation

POLICY DEBATE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX)

  2. POLICY DEBATE • Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best • Affirmative: Supports the resolution • Negative: Supports the status quo

  3. AFF & NEG Responsibilities • AFF: Defends resolution by giving a plan- specific proposal that fits within framework of resolution; case with reasons why the plan should be enacted (advantages over the status quo) • NEG: Explains why AFF plan is not good • May make problem worse or cause more problems than it solves • Can agree that there is a problem with status quo, but that there is a better way to solve it than AFF’s plan • Can argue AFF plan does not fit within framework of resolution

  4. CX Debate Format • 8 minutes each constructive speech • 3 minutes cross-examination after each constructive • 5 minutes each rebuttal • 8 minutes prep. time per team

  5. More on CX format • The CX is done by the person not doing the next constructive • AFF speaks first and last; to balance this out, NEG gets Negative block

  6. Five Stock Issues • Topicality- AFF must meet each term in resolution; plan has to fit within framework • Harms- AFF shows status quo as bad • Inherency- cause of problem cited by AFF (why status quo can’t solve); barrier that prevents present policies from reducing harms • Solvency- AFF plan resolves significant part of harm • Advantages- AFF has to produce advantages to solve harms; NEG argues adoption of AFF plan creates more problems that outweigh any advantage it offers

  7. Counterplan Basics • Compete against AFF policy • Parts: • Text- explanation of what it does; just like AFF plan • Competition- explanation of why counterplan should be preferred over the plan • Solvency- explanation of how the counterplan fixes the affirmative problem • Net benefits- reasons why the counterplan is better than the plan

More Related