1 / 63

EALAW Conference 29 th March 2011 Newport Minority Ethnic Achievement: Myth or Miracle?

EALAW Conference 29 th March 2011 Newport Minority Ethnic Achievement: Myth or Miracle? What do the statistics for Wales tell us about Race Equality in schools? Dr. Jonathan Brentnall. 1. Big Picture. Context. Inform work with individuals. In the stats – every child matters.

Download Presentation

EALAW Conference 29 th March 2011 Newport Minority Ethnic Achievement: Myth or Miracle?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EALAW Conference 29th March 2011 Newport Minority Ethnic Achievement: Myth or Miracle? What do the statistics for Wales tell us about Race Equality in schools? Dr. Jonathan Brentnall

  2. 1. Big Picture Context Inform work with individuals In the stats – every child matters At a social level – every child matters Statistics influence expectations – use them carefully

  3. 2. Potential v Attainment Grouped attainment statistics are NOT a measurement of POTENTIAL (group or individual) Only tell you what pupils ATTAINED measured against a particular level at a certain time – not what they’re CAPABLE of

  4. 3. Achievement v Attainment A child may ACHIEVE much but NOT ATTAIN a set target level A child may make great progress but still not ATTAIN the level of their peers

  5. 4. Assessments contain bias Socially constructed Culturally framed Biased towards those who share a similar social and cultural framework of experience Certain kinds of knowledge, understanding and skills are valued more than others Built-in disadvantage for some

  6. 5. Working within the system Curriculum & testing need to be addressed at a political, policy level Some room for professional discretion Tacit acceptance of working within the statutory framework Ultimately – children & people are judged by their level of success in the education system – as it is

  7. 6. Racial/ethnic differences or inequalities? Gender pay gap = Unequal Pay Underlying principle – men and women are equal All equal – equal entitlements – equal opportunities – equal access – equal outcomes Different educational/assessment outcomes impact on … further & higher education uptake, career options, earnings, social mobility, quality of life …

  8. 7. Explaining the statistics Pupil population divided up by race/ethnicity Ethnic identities - intermediate categories Small numbers = less reliable statistics Aggregated 2005-2010 = more robust statistics Attainment – CSI (Eng, Maths, Sci) KS1-4 Gender KS4 (2005-09), Free School Meals (2009/10), Exclusions (2003-09), EAL Stages (2010)

  9.     €  €  €     €   €   €   €   €  €      € €  €    €    €   €  €  € €    €   € €    €    €    €   €  €    €   € €   €  €      € €  € €   € €   €    €  € Distribution of attainment in norm-based assessment Number of people Level of attainment

  10.     High target level of attainment (few can achieve) Number of people Level of attainment

  11.       €  €   €  €  €  €    €   €  € €    €  € €     Lower target level of attainment (more can achieve) Number of people Level of attainment

  12.     €  €  €     €   €   €   €   €  €      € €  €    €    €   €  €  € €    €   € €    €    €    €   €  €    €   € €   €  €     € €  € €   € €   €    Low target level of attainment (most can achieve) Number of people Level of attainment

  13.  €  €     €   € €  € In an EQUAL system - % people attaining the target / expected level % Comparison of different groupings

  14. NC Assessment & exams The statistics represent: All pupils recorded in PLASC on roll & assessed Combined figures for 6 years from 2005-2010 drawn from Statistical bulletins SB 16/2008 (2005-2007) and SB 24/2011 (2008-2010)

  15. L2 L4 L5 A*-C

  16. What do the attainment statistics tell us? Higher proportions of pupils from several minority ethnic groupings attain expected levels: Chinese, Indian, Mixed White & Asian, Any other Asian background, Any other Mixed background In several minority groupings, the proportion of pupils attaining the expected level increases from KS1-4 compared to the national figure: Any other white background, Any other ethnic group, Mixed White and Black African, Pakistani, Bangladeshi

  17. What do the attainment statistics tell us? Some groupings start at a disadvantage: Gypsy/Roma, Traveller, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Black African, Black Caribbean, Mixed White & Black Caribbean, Any other Black background, Mixed White & Black African, Any other White and Any other ethnic group. Some groupings - proportions decline over time: Gypsy/Roma, Traveller, Black Caribbean, Black African, Mixed White and Black Caribbean, Any other Black backgd. Issues at all Key Stages – most gps decline highest in KS3

  18. Gender & Attainment Are there any differences between boys’ and girls’ attainments?

  19. 8.5 8.9 9.8 1.1 8.8 5.4 6.1 6.1 6

  20. 10.2 6 11.7 0.6 4.8 1.8 1.5 29.2 2.7 1.8

  21. Gender gap Several groupings with low numbers of attainers - smaller gap betweenboys and girls. Pakistani & Bangladeshi heritage boys behind. Several groupings with high numbers of attainers - larger gap between boys and girls. Chinese, Indian, Any other Asian, Any other Mixed background boys behind.

  22. EAL Stage How significant is EAL proficiency?

  23. FSM eligibility How significant is socio-economic background?

More Related