Lecture 8
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 11

LECTURE 8 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 51 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

LECTURE 8. BISHOP BERKELEY DEMOLISHES THE “EXTERNAL WORLD”. WHAT ARE THE IMMEDIATE OBJECTS OF PERCEPTION?. PHILONOUS REPRESENTS BERKELEY. HYLAS IS A PHILOSOPHICALLY EDUCATED FOIL FOR BERKELEY’S ARGUMENTS. “WHAT IS A “SENSIBLE ‘OBJECT’”?

Download Presentation

LECTURE 8

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Lecture 8

LECTURE 8

BISHOP BERKELEY

DEMOLISHES THE “EXTERNAL WORLD”


What are the immediate objects of perception

WHAT ARE THE IMMEDIATE OBJECTS OF PERCEPTION?

PHILONOUS REPRESENTS BERKELEY. HYLAS IS A PHILOSOPHICALLY EDUCATED FOIL FOR BERKELEY’S ARGUMENTS.

“WHAT IS A “SENSIBLE ‘OBJECT’”?

A SENSIBLE OBJECT IS AN IMMEDIATE OBJECT OF PERCEPTION


What is immediately perceived

WHAT IS IMMEDIATELY PERCEIVED?


Berkeley s sensible qualities argument

BERKELEY’S “SENSIBLE QUALITIES”ARGUMENT

  • THE “SENSIBLE OBJECTS” ARE THE IMMEDIATE OBJECTS OF PERCEPTION.

  • THE IMMEDIATE OBJECTS OF PERCEPTION ARE SENSIBLE QUALITIES (OR COMBINATIONS OF SUCH).

    (3) A SENSIBLE QUALITY CANNOT BE OUTSIDE OF THE MIND – SUCH QUALITIES ARE PARTS OF SENSATIONS.


Conclusion

CONCLUSION

  • THE SENSIBLE OBJECTS ARE MENTAL: QUALITIES AND COMBINATIONS OF QUALITIES IN THE MIND.

    BERKELEY TAKES THIS TO MEAN THAT THE COMMONSENSE OBJECTS OF PERCEPTION ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE MIND (THERE REALLY IS NO REASON TO BELIEVE IN AN “EXTERNAL WORLD”.


The continuity argument

THE CONTINUITY ARGUMENT

  • HEAT VARIES CONTINUOUSLY FROM A SMALL DEGREE TO AN INTENSE DEGREE.

    (2) AN INTENSE DEGREE OF HEAT IS IDENTICAL WITH THE PAIN FELT BY A PERCEIVER.

  • PAIN IS ENTIRELY WITHIN THE MIND OF THE PERCEIVER.

    (4) ALL DEGREES OF HEAT ARE “EQUALLY REAL” (I.E., IN THE MIND OR WITHOUT THE MIND)


Conclusion1

CONCLUSION

(5) HEAT IN ALL ITS DEGREES IS A SENSIBLE QUALITY IN THE MIND OF THE PERCEIVER.

PHILONOUS (BERKELEY) ALSO ARGUES THAT A WARMTH CAN BE IDENTICAL WITH A PLEASURE – AND HENCE ALSO LOW DEGREES OF HEAT ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE MIND.


The lukewarm water argument

THE LUKEWARM WATER ARGUMENT

  • IF A PERCEIVER PUTS A COLD HAND AND A WARM HAND INTO LUKEWARM WATER, THE WATER WILL BE FELT COLD AND HOT.

    (2) THE SAME THING CANNOT BE BOTH COLD AND HOT AT THE SAME TIME.

    (3) THE COLDNESS AND THE HOTNESS MUST BE SENSIBLE QUALITIES IN THE MIND (IN DIFFERENT REGIONS OF “TACTILE SPACE.”)


The pin and the coal

THE PIN AND THE COAL

  • WHEN A PERCEIVER “PRICKS HIS FINGER WITH A PIN”, THE PAIN IS CERTAINLY NOT IN THE PIN.

    (2) BY ANALOGY, WHEN A PERCEIVER “BURNS HIS FINGER WITH A COAL”, THE HEAT IS IDENTICAL WITH THE PAIN AND IS CERTAINLY NOT IN THE COAL.


Sugar and wormwood

SUGAR AND WORMWOOD

(1) WHEN THE SWEETNESS OF SUGAR IS PERCEIVED, IT IS A PLEASURE.

(2) WHEN THE BITTERNESS OF WORMWOOD IS PERCEIVED, IT IS A DISPLEASURE.

(3) PLEASURES AND DISPLEASURE MUST BE IN THE MIND OF A PERCEIVER. SO SWEETNESS AND BITTERNESS ARE IN THE MIND.


Odors motions sounds colors size extension

ODORS, MOTIONS, SOUNDS, COLORS, SIZE, EXTENSION

  • PHILONOUS ARGUES CASE BY CASE THAT SENSIBLE QUALITIES ARE ALL IN THE MIND – INCLUDING MOTION (!).

  • HYLAS APPEALS TO THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY QUALITIES.


  • Login