- 89 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Mapping the Milky Way’s halo with BHB and K giant stars

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Mapping the Milky Way’s halo with BHB and K giant stars

Xiangxiang Xue (Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy)

collaborators: Hans-Walter Rix, Heather Morrison, Paul Harding, Real(Zhibo) Ma, Bill Janesh, Timothy C. Beers, Young Sun Lee, Eric F. Bell, Constance Rockosi, Brian Yanny, James S. Bullock and Kathryn Johnston

need kinematic tracers with r(α,δ,D), vlos and [Fe/H] to

- trace the MW halo mass
Mvir (Halo) vs. e.g. Mstar -->> baryon fraction in stars

Scale expected number of dark matter sub-halos

Dynamics of the local group -->> M31 infall, LMC bound?

- see and quantify position-velocity substructure
Signposts of hierarchical formation

for that, we need tracers which are luminous and have good distances:

BHB stars(Mg~0.7) have good distances, but are very old.

K-giants (-3<Mr<1) are more representative, but distances are less precise.

BHB stars in SDSS （Xue et al. 2008, 2011,Deason et al. 2012)

- are luminous enough to be observed in distant halo (d~60kpc);
- have nearly constant absolute magnitude (Mg~0.7);
So, they have precise distances ~ 5%, but metallicities are only approximate.

SEGUE K giants

Giant stars

- are luminous to visible to >100kpc
- have well-defined ntracer/M*(tot)
- are present at all (old) ages and [Fe/H]
- (K-)giant stars (in SEGUE)
- but have wide luminosity range -3<Mr<1
- How to get good distances for giant stars?

- The SSPP slightly overestimates the [Fe/H], but they are consistent with GCs’ [Fe/H] within 0.2 dex.
- The SSPP underestimates the log g, so it will introduce some dwarfs if only use log g as a cut.
- Mg lines are used to double check!

- [Fe/H] from SEGUE spectra
- (g-r) from SDSS photometry
- DM = mr-Mr( g-r, [Fe/H])

- But!!!
- How to incorporate [Fe/H] and g-r errors?
- p(L)~L-2 more likely to over-estimate L over-estimate DM
- Very high/low [Fe/H] values are rare systematic errors
- Set up probabilistic framework, including prior (i.e. external) information through Bayes’ theorem

observables priors

with Gaussian errors

Prior (=external) information

Results for 3 stars L(DM)

Luminosity prior

no [Fe/H] prior

no lum. prior

- Get L(DM) for each star, which depends on:
- [Fe/H] errors, magnitude errors, g-r errors
- Mr, [Fe/H]: priors, and shape of isochrones

How good are the distances?

The impact of priors

- We get for 9000 halo giant stars:
- Unbiased distance estimates to giant stars
- We get distance errors (full pdf)
- 5000 K giants with r>15kpc and Mr<0.5 (previous samples: 200)
- Distances good to ~15%
- Distances most precise at ~100kpc
- tip of the giant branch

Basic approach:

- Assemble a large and well defined set of distant kinematic tracers from SDSS
BHBs with distance precision of 5%

r~60 kpc, δv~7 km/s, [Fe/H]

- Compare to Kinematics in the simulated halos that have been scaled to different halo mass
derive p(vlos) at different r

model it to get Vcir(r)

- Fit Vcir(r) to the NFW DM halo+ Hernquistbulge+exponential disk
Mvir=1.0±0.3×1012M⊙

Results:(Xue, Rix et al 2008)

- Robust measurement
M(r<60kpc)=4.0±0.7×1011M⊙

- Vcir(r) is not constant but gently falling.
- If DM halo is NFW then
Mvir=1.0±0.3×1012M⊙

- Imply (high) 40% of baryons end up as stars.
- LMC and other satellites marginally bound.

r>15kpc

r>15kpc

Xue et al 2012 (in prep)

- K giants show consistent velocity dispersion profile to BHB etc. by X08 and Deason et al. 2012.
- 700 tracers R>40kpc far smaller error bars
- dispersion drops to 65km/s at 100 kpc
- new Mvir model ongoing

no Sgr stream r>15kpc

4-distance

is defined as distance between two stars in 4-dimension space (α,δ,d,vlos)(Starkenburg et al. 2009)

Compare to smooth model to quantify the substructure.

Results: (Xue, Rix et al. 2011)

- Very clear position-velocity substructure signal seen in BHB sample.
- The outer halo of the Milky Way exhibits a stronger kinematic substructure signal than the inner halo.
- Quantitatively, most simulations produce a stronger substructure signal.
BHB stars are overrepresented in the oldest sub-populations of the stellar halo

turn to K giants !!

log(4distance)

log(4distance)

log(4distance)

stronger substructure

in less metal poor stars

stronger substructure

in K giants (vs BHB)

stronger substructure

in distant halo

Sgr dominates substructure signal

- BHB stars have showed that
- Vcir(r) is not constant but gently falling
- the mass of the dark matter halo is 1.0±0.3×1012M⊙
- obvious substructure signal, more distant more substructure, but weaker than models, which we attribute to BHB stars being overrepresented in the oldest sub-populations

- So, we turn to more representative tracers – K giants.
- ~5000 K giants with distances good to 15%
- more precise at larger distances
- 700 K giants with r>40kpc.
- Preliminary results from SEGUE K giants show that
- the radial velocity dispersion profile σlos(r) is falling with the distance low-mass halo(?)
- K giants show stronger substructure signal than BHBs (metallicity?)
- more distant & more metal rich giants show more substructure

Thank you!