1 / 42

Empirical Studies of Aesthetics in Information Technology

Empirical Studies of Aesthetics in Information Technology. Noam Tractinsky Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Nov 2003. Contents. Background Description of 4 empirical studies on aesthetics and IT Discussion. History: Emergence of the HCI Discipline.

gwidon
Download Presentation

Empirical Studies of Aesthetics in Information Technology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Empirical Studies of Aesthetics in Information Technology Noam Tractinsky Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Nov 2003

  2. Contents • Background • Description of 4 empirical studies on aesthetics and IT • Discussion 11/2003 Haifa U.

  3. History: Emergence of the HCI Discipline • Context: Emergence of interactive systems • Roots: cognitive science, ergonomics • Goal: efficient interactions • Criteria: time, errors • Flagship concept: Usability • Aesthetics considered irrelevant if not outright harmful 11/2003 Haifa U.

  4. Future: The User Experience? • Context: universal accessibility, Web-based applications, customization, personalization, IT as consumer commodity • Goal: support the user experience • Affective Computing • Aesthetic Computing “…the theory, practice and application of aesthetics in computing.” • Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment 11/2003 Haifa U.

  5. Studies of Aesthetics of Information Technology 11/2003 Haifa U.

  6. Study 1 – ATM Layout Design Tractinsky, CHI ‘97 • Trigger: Kurosu and Kashimura, 1995 • K&K’s research goal was to find correlation between usability guidelines (“inherent usability”) and “apparent usability” • Finding: high correlations between perceptions of (pre-use) usability and of aesthetics • Interesting … but results are probably tainted by Japanese culture 11/2003 Haifa U.

  7. Study 1 – Cross-Cultural Validation • Repeat the study in Israel • Improve the methodology – three experiments • Exact replication • Separate measurement of aesthetic and usability responses • Computerized, complete randomization 11/2003 Haifa U.

  8. Example 1 11/2003 Haifa U.

  9. Example 2 11/2003 Haifa U.

  10. Results: Japan vs. Israel 11/2003 Haifa U.

  11. Very interesting … Beautiful = Usable ? 11/2003 Haifa U.

  12. Study 2 – ATM Usage Tractinsky, Shoval-Katz and Ikar, IwC, 2000 • What happens to the aesthetics-usability relation after usage? • Evaluation of 9 layouts from the previous studies (randomly displayed) on three attributes: usability, aesthetics, amount of information • Manipulating aesthetics: Assign to experimental groups first; then assign systems based on pre-experimental ratings • Manipulating Usability: Introduction of system delays and other faulty features • Participants completed 11 ATM tasks 11/2003 Haifa U.

  13. Experimental Design and Pre-Experiment Perceptions 11/2003 Haifa U.

  14. Correlations * p < .01 level. Table 2: A correlation matrix of pre-, and post-experimental measures (n = 124). The colors separate pre-experimental correlations between three measures (top-left), post-experimental correlations (bottom-right), and correlations between pre-, and post-experimental measures (top-right). 11/2003 Haifa U.

  15. Post-experimental perceptions of usability and aesthetics Fig. 1. Post-experimental perceptions of usability and aesthetics (on a 1-10 scale) under three levels of ATM aesthetics and two levels of ATM usability.

  16. MANCOVA * p < .01; ** p < .001. Table 3: Results and significance levels of univariate and stepdown F-tests of the effects of the Aesthetics and the Usability factors on post-experimental measures, with pre-experimental perceptions of usability as a covariate.

  17. Study 3 - Developing a Measurement Instrument for the Evaluation of Web-site AestheticsLavie and Tractinsky, IJHCS, in press • Questionnaire on aesthetics of Web sites • Four experiments • Three studies used students as participants • In the last study users were solicited from web-sites • Method – EFA, CFA 11/2003 Haifa U.

  18. Experiments • Experiment 1 – 125 students,http://www.times.com • Experiment 2 – 212 students,http://www.gap.com , http://www.macys.com • Experiment 3 - 145students,http://www.hashulcan.co.il • Experiment 4 - 384users, various sites 11/2003 Haifa U.

  19. Aesthetic Dimensions of Web sites (Exp. 4, cross-validation) Classical Aesthetics (α=.86) Aesthetic design Pleasant design Clear design # Clean design Symmetric design .78 Usability (α=.95) Convenient use Easy orientation Easy to use Easy to navigate Clear design # .63 ExpressiveAesthetics (α=.86) Creative design Fascinating design Use of special effects Original design Sophisticated design χ2 (df=158)= 259.12 p= .000 RMSEA = .058 TLI = .955 CFI = .962 IFI = .963 SRMR = .061 .40 11/2003 Haifa U.

  20. Study 4 - Skin PreferencesTractinsky and Zmiri • Motivation: The phenomenon of application personalization • By 2000, more than 50,000,000 skins had been downloaded from the major skin sites • Emotions towards computer applications are affected by three dimensions (after Rafaeli and Vilnai-Yavetz): • Usability • Aesthetics • Symbolism 11/2003 Haifa U.

  21. Application: Microsoft’s Media Player 11/2003 Haifa U.

  22. 11/2003 Haifa U.

  23. Procedure • Evaluate the default interface + 11 skins • Compare the default MP to two chosen skins; rate each on 15 items • Make a final choice; state the reasons 11/2003 Haifa U.

  24. Ratings of the Default and the 2 choices 11/2003 Haifa U.

  25. Table 1: Rotated factor matrix of responses to items reflecting usability, aesthetics, and symbolism.

  26. * p < .01 Table 2: Alpha reliabilities (on the diagonal) ,inter-variable correlations, and number of items for the three skin aspects 11/2003 Haifa U.

  27. Regression Analysis * p < .01, ** p<.001 Table 3: Adjusted R2 and standardized regression coefficients of the three skin aspects regressed on satisfying experience and pleasant experience. 11/2003 Haifa U.

  28. Open-ended Responses Coded by two independent judges Table 4: Number (percentage) of reasons provided for the general question and for the choice question, tabulated by skin aspect. *Main considerations in choosing a PC-based entertainment system #Reasons for choosing the most preferred skin

  29. Final Choice • 80% chose an alternative skin 11/2003 Haifa U.

  30. Vitruvian Principles of Architecture Firmitas Strength Durability Stability Utilitas Utility Convenience Venustas Beauty Grace 11/2003 Haifa U.

  31. Why aesthetics matters? 11/2003 Haifa U.

  32. Why aesthetics matters? • Level of performance exceeds most users’ needs • Aesthetically-based valuations are immediate and hard to overcome • Aesthetics satisfies basic human needs. • Like it or not, it’s here to stay … 11/2003 Haifa U.

  33. Conclusions • Relevant research area • Research is only at the beginning – needs replication and validation • Areas of extension • Multifaceted research – needs multiple approaches, visions, methodologies • More food for thought …. 11/2003 Haifa U.

  34. An alternative (tentative) model of IT adoption Adoption Emotion Cognition Expressive Aesthetics Classic Aesthetics Symbolism Usability (EOU) Usefulness 11/2003 Haifa U.

  35. 11/2003 Haifa U.

  36. HCI (Nielsen, 1993) Utility: whether the functionality of the system in principle can do what is needed. Usability: ”a quality attribute that assesses how easy user interfaces are to use” MIS (Davis, 1989) Usefulness: the extent to which using the system will enhance job performance. Ease of use: the extent to which using the system will be free of effort 11/2003 Haifa U.

  37. Source: Norman (1998) 11/2003 Haifa U.

  38. Stimuli and Measures 11/2003 Haifa U.

  39. 11/2003 Haifa U.

  40. 11/2003 Haifa U.

  41. Symbolism Usability Aesthetics Source: D. Norman, Emotional Design (2004) 11/2003 Haifa U.

  42. A Framework for the Study of Aesthetics in Information Systems? Methodological Issues:Exploring the black box Relations to Other Variables: Perceptions, Attitudes, Performance, Satisfaction Aesthetic Processes: Cognition, Affect IT Factors Moderators:System Type, Context, Culture, Personality 11/2003 Haifa U.

More Related