1 / 20

Mapping the Phase Structure of Cold Nuclei -- Gluon Saturation at small-x

Mapping the Phase Structure of Cold Nuclei -- Gluon Saturation at small-x. Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Refs: Mueller, Xiao, Yuan, to be published; Stasto, Xiao, Yuan, arXiv:1109.1817;

Download Presentation

Mapping the Phase Structure of Cold Nuclei -- Gluon Saturation at small-x

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mapping the Phase Structure of Cold Nuclei-- Gluon Saturation at small-x Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Refs: Mueller, Xiao, Yuan, to be published; Stasto, Xiao, Yuan, arXiv:1109.1817; Dominguiz, Xiao, Yuan, PRL 106, 022301 (2011); Marquet, Dominguiz,Xiao,Yuan, PRD83, 105005 (2011)

  2. Outlines • Introduction • Sudakov double logarithms in hard processes • Two-particle correlations as probe for the phase structure of cold nuclei

  3. QCD dynamics in cold nuclei • Inclusive observables • DIS structure functions • P+Ah+x • Gluon density in integral form or limited access to the kt-dependence • Full exploration of the dynamics needs kt-dependence in hard processes

  4. Kt-dependent observables • Hard processes probe the kt-dependent gluon distributions directly • Saturation phenomena manifest in the observables PJ>>KT KT CSS

  5. Sudakov Double Logarithms • Differential cross section depends on Q1, where Q2>>Q12>>2QCD • We have to resum these large logs to make reliable predictions • QT: Dokshitzer, Diakonov, Troian, 78; Parisi Petronzio, 79; Collins, Soper, Sterman, 85 • Threshold: Sterman 87; Catani and Trentadue 89

  6. Collins-Soper-Sterman Resummation • Large Logs are re-summed by solving the energy evolution equation of the TMDs • K and G obey the renormalization group eq. • The large logs will be resummed into the exponential form factor • A,B,C functions are perturbative calculable.

  7. Sudakov resummation at small-x • Take massive scalar particle production p+A->H+X as an example to demonstrate the double logarithms, and resummation p H,MH WW-gluon distribution A

  8. Explicit one-loop calculations • Collinear divergence  DGLAP evolution • Small-x divergence  BK-type evolution Dominguiz-Mueller-Munier-Xiao, 2011

  9. Final result • Double logs at one-loop order • Collins-Soper-Sterman resummation

  10. Comments • Sudakov double logs can be re-summed consistently in the small-x formalism • Kinematics of double logs and small-x evolution are well separated • Soft vs collinear gluons • If Qs is small, back to dilute region • If Qs is large (~Q), we can safely neglect the Sudakov effects

  11. Di-jet correlations in pA • Effective kt-factorization is formulated • In forward region of dAu collisions at RHIC and pA at LHC, Qs is large enough to neglect the Sudakov effects

  12. Central dAu collisions • η1~η2~3.2 • Q2sA~0.85A(1/3) Qsp2 • GBW model • No Sudakov effects No-BK evolution Geometric scaling

  13. Mapping the phase structure • RHIC • pA at LHC CSS 1GeV

  14. Universality of UGD • Un-ambiguously study at the EIC

  15. Conclusion • Sudakov double logs are re-summed in the small-x saturation formalism • Hard processes are used to map the phase structure of cold nuclei at small-x • Further developments shall follow to fully investigate the QCD dynamics at small-x in dense medium

  16. PHENIX JdA

  17. EIC predictions

  18. pA at the LHC PT

  19. Violation effects xG(1) qgqg xG(1)F xG(2)

  20. Compare to the STAR data • η1~η2~3.1 • GBW model for UGDs • Qs2~(3.10-4/x)0.28GeV2 • Q2sA~0.45A(1/3) Qsp2 • No Sudakov effects No-BK evolution Geometric scaling

More Related