slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Background: ADP Assessment Consortium Consortium Organization and Governance Potential Application Requirements: Demonstrating Capacity for Success

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 18

Background: ADP Assessment Consortium Consortium Organization and Governance Potential Application Requirements: Demon - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 108 Views
  • Uploaded on

Background: ADP Assessment Consortium Consortium Organization and Governance Potential Application Requirements: Demonstrating Capacity for Success Increasing Odds of Success. American Diploma Project Assessment Consortium. Initiated in 2005 by 9 states in Achieve-led ADP Network

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Background: ADP Assessment Consortium Consortium Organization and Governance Potential Application Requirements: Demon' - gustav


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide2

Background: ADP Assessment Consortium

  • Consortium Organization and Governance
  • Potential Application Requirements: Demonstrating Capacity for Success
  • Increasing Odds of Success
american diploma project assessment consortium
American Diploma Project Assessment Consortium
  • Initiated in 2005 by 9 states in Achieve-led ADP Network
    • consortium has grown to 15 states
  • State share broader college- and career-ready policy agenda
  • Started with Algebra II EOC exam, expanded to include Algebra I
  • Agreed-upon policy purposes
    • Improve curriculum and instruction and ensure consistency of content and rigor
    • Enable states to compare results across and within states
    • Indicate readiness for college credit bearing mathematics
  • Agreement to college-ready cut score set by Achieve
slide4

ADP Assessment Consortium

In summer 2006, nine states issued RFP for the development of an Algebra II EOC Exam:

  • Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island
  • Ohio acted as “lead state” in unprecedented multi-state procurement arrangement
  • Pearson awarded contract in 2007 with addition of Algebra I in 2008
  • Since the consortium began, six additional states have joined: Arizona, Florida, Hawaii, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Washington.

More states are expressing

interest in the exam and

joining the consortium…

consortium organization and governance
Consortium Organization and Governance
  • ADP Consortium Member States
  • Ohio – lead state
  • Coordination and Direction Team (CDT)
  • Achieve
  • Center for Assessment – technical advisor
  • Pearson – test developer selected competitively
new state members
New State Members

Membership is extended to any ADP Network state wanting to join

New member states must:

Agree to terms of Partnership Agreement and MOU

Agree to terms stated in the contract (but may add language)

Participate in all CDT meetings, item development and review meetings

Make firm, long range commitments

Contractual

Personnel

Financial

6

role of the lead state ohio
Role of the Lead State: Ohio

Appoint a procurement officer

Conduct procurement

Provide guidance to the CDT

Administer the contract

Manage contract amendments

Incorporate new states into the contract

7

the coordination and direction team
The Coordination and Direction Team

Includes assessment directors or other high-ranking policy-making officials from each member state in the consortium

Oversees production and implementation of the Algebra I & II program

Ensures that legal and policy needs of each state are addressed during team deliberations and decision making

8

the cdt and decision making
The CDT and Decision Making

The CDT states have:

Multiple representatives

One vote

Process of consensus, collaboration, and compromise:

Relating to the policies of each state

Repeated as necessary

Less discussion time needed as process matures

For contractual matters, decisions must be unanimous

9

achieve s role
Achieve’s Role
  • Convener and consensus builder
    • Brought chiefs, state content and assessment directors, governors & postsecondary leaders to the table
  • Consortium Management
    • Communications with and among states
    • Consensus building
    • Project manager/oversee development contract
    • Assembled additional expertise (technical, legal)
  • Content expertise
    • ADP Benchmark standards
    • Model course descriptions
achieve s role11
Achieve’s Role
  • Promote Postsecondary participation
    • Math faculty at 2- and 4-year institutions
    • System leadership
    • With key national higher education organizations
  • Define college readiness
    • Conceptually
    • Set achievement levels and cut scores
key lessons for states participating in a consortium takes time and communication
Key Lessons for States: Participating in a Consortium Takes Time and Communication
  • Active involvement of chief state school officer in start up phase is essential, so that state policy objectives and improvement strategy drive assessment design
  • Essential but difficult to sustain their engagement over time, as project moves to development and implementation phases
  • Governors and legislatures play critical roles in state testing policy; they must be engaged and informed along the way
  • The transaction costs for SEA staff are high compared with single-state assessment development
key lessons for states it s not just about the test
Key Lessons for States: It’s Not Just About the Test
  • Developing common summative assessments is difficult
  • Summative assessments not enough – coherent approach that includes formative and interim assessments, curriculum and instructional materials, professional development is necessary to support instructional improvement
  • That requires more ambitious effort, and broader and deeper consensus among participating states
  • Common standards provides critical foundation for such an approach
key lessons for states shared vision is essential
Key Lessons for States: Shared Vision is Essential
  • States must have common standards and must hold firm to a shared vision:
    • of policy objectives
    • of uses and purposes of assessments
    • of assessment system design
  • Scope of the vision will determine other practices must also be held in common. The more comprehensive and coherent the vision, the more issues states must address in common
  • Within a consortium, willingness to compromise on behalf of larger vision and shared goals is essential
    • To develop summative tests alone, states must still be willing to compromise on scores of details (e.g. testing windows, testing modes, test security, test guidelines, calculator policy for mathematics, accommodations, etc.)
    • Additional compromise will be needed in more ambitious approaches
potential application requirements consortia should be asked to demonstrate
Potential Application Requirements: Consortia Should be Asked to Demonstrate:

High degree of consensus around:

  • Policy Objectives
    • Instructional Improvement
    • Vision of assessment system
  • Leadership Capacity in each state
    • Support of Governor
    • Active Leadership by and commitment of Chief State School Officer (not just state testing directors) and Postsecondary leaders (for college-readiness)
    • Engagement of State Board of Education and Legislature as appropriate in each state
potential application requirements consortia should be asked to demonstrate16
Potential Application Requirements: Consortia Should be Asked to Demonstrate:
  • Technical capacity across the consortium, matched to assessment system design
  • Consortium Governance and Decision-Making Structure
  • Consortium Procurement Strategy
  • Roles and Responsibilities of Consortium members and partners, including supporting organizations
increasing the odds of success over time
Increasing the Odds of Success Over Time

Applications should include a sustainability plan that addresses:

  • Anticipated (and unanticipated) leadership turnover, especially for governors and chiefs
  • Strategies for building and sustaining support among key stakeholders
    • Ongoing communications with teachers, students and parents about purposes and uses of assessments
  • Annual assessment costs, especially if:
    • Projected annual costs expected to exceed current costs
    • Continuous development (e.g., new items) is part of design, beyond life of federal grant
  • Ongoing commitment of partner organizations through grant period
ad