Family literacy practice and research in canada
Download
1 / 69

Family literacy practice and research in Canada - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 138 Views
  • Uploaded on

Family literacy practice and research in Canada. Yvon Laberge Éduk Alberta, Canada [email protected] Overview. Setting the table: The Canadian geo-political context Family literacy practice - examples from Alberta Research in Family Literacy Two cases studies explored. Huge landbase.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Family literacy practice and research in Canada' - gurit


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Overview
Overview

  • Setting the table: The Canadian geo-political context

  • Family literacy practice - examples from Alberta

  • Research in Family Literacy

  • Two cases studies explored



Population
Population

  • Most of the population concentrated along the 49th parallel

  • Officially bilingual - French and English

  • Canada is a land of immigrants

  • Aboriginal populations are the fastest growing

  • Largest cities are Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver - all cosmopolitan

  • Rural areas tend to be more ethnically homogeneous


Political organization two tier system
Political organization: Two tier system

  • National government (federal government)

  • Provincial and territorial governments (10 provinces and 3 territories)

  • Roles and responsibilities defined in the national constitution


Division of responsibilities

Federal government

No direct involvement in education

Redirect funds to provincial/territorial governments for adult education

No program delivery mandate - only peripheral support

Provincial/territorial governments

Education - raise taxes, define curriculum, etc.

Manage adult education systems

Responsible for direct delivery of adult/family literacy

Division of responsibilities


Consequences
Consequences

  • No national literacy strategy (one of the few industrial countries lacking such a strategy)

  • 13 different approaches to literacy delivery

  • Little or no transferability between programs from one province/territory to another

  • Generally poorly funded adult/family literacy programs


Literacy levels ialss results
Literacy levels (IALSS results)

  • Examined three forms of literacy: prose, document, quantitative

  • Five levels

  • Level 3 is the level the OECD and Statistics Canada consider to be the minimum required to be able to function effectively in a modern society and economy.


Literacy levels ialss results1
Literacy levels (IALSS results)

  • 42% of the working aged adult population was at levels one and two on the IALS prose scale

  • Represents approximately 9 million Canadians


Literacy levels aboriginal population
Literacy levels (Aboriginal population)

  • Prose literacy performance of the Aboriginal populations surveyed is lower than that of the total Canadian population.

  • Younger Aboriginal people have higher scores than older ones but all age groups score lower than non-Aboriginal people.


Literacy levels francophone population
Literacy levels (Francophone population)

  • The proportion of Francophones with low literacy is higher than the proportion of Anglophones with low literacy - 52% across the country

  • 56% in Québec

  • 66% in New Brunswick


Literacy levels immigrant population
Literacy levels (Immigrant population)

  • Overall, immigrants of work age performed significantly below the Canadian born population.

  • Immigrants whose mother tongue was neither English nor French have lower average scores in all four domains compared to immigrants whose mother tongue is one of the two official languages.


Unexpected results
Unexpected results

  • Little improvement in the overall literacy proficiency of adult Canadians between 1994 and 2003


Improvements had been expected because
Improvements had been expected because:

  • Retirement of older, less educated workers;

  • New immigrants tend to be more highly educated;

  • Growth in the proportion of the Canadian-born population with postsecondary education


Impact of these results on family literacy
Impact of these results on family literacy

  • Family literacy policies tend to focus on children who are in “at risk environments”

  • Target immigrant populations

  • Target aboriginal populations

  • Federal government has targeted francophones in a minority context


In the province of alberta
In the province of Alberta

  • Parent-child literacy strategy

  • Family literacy initiative fund


Parent child literacy strategy
Parent-child literacy strategy

Focuses on intergenerational educational approaches that integrate adult literacy development and early oral language development for children aged 0 to 6 for economically and socially disadvantaged families.


Parent child literacy strategy objectives
Parent-child literacy strategy: Objectives

  • Enhance the oral language, early literacy and social interaction skills of children aged 0 to 6

  • Strengthen and build the basic literacy skills of parents.

  • Support and foster the involvement of parents in their children’s learning

  • Develop and enhance community-based partnerships


Parent child literacy strategy 5 strategic axis
Parent-child literacy strategy: 5 strategic axis

  • Awareness Raising

  • Assessing Need

  • Program Delivery

  • Training

  • Evaluation


Parent child literacy strategy key activities to date
Parent-child literacy strategy: Key activities to date

  • English Express Special Issues

  • Parent-Child Literacy and Home Visitation Partnerships

  • Intensive Family Literacy Pilot and Evaluation (Learning Together Study)

  • Training

  • Family Literacy Initiative Fund


Parent child literacy strategy home visitation pilot project
Parent-child literacy strategy: Home visitation pilot project

  • Support home-visitors in providing family literacy programmes in the home.

    • Training

    • Materials and programmes

    • Evaluation


Parent child literacy strategy innovative projects
Parent-child literacy strategy: Innovative projects project

  • A number of innovative projects are supported including the Classroom on Wheels (C.O.W.)


Alberta prairie c 0 w video interlude
Alberta Prairie C.0.W. projectVideo interlude!!!


Sample family literacy programmes supported by the flif
Sample Family Literacy Programmes supported by the FLIF* project

*The following slides on

programmes have been

reproduced with the

permission of the Centre for

Family Literacy


Books for babies
Books for Babies project

Provides resources to families

Encourages parents to read to their children

Builds strong foundations in literacy


Building Blocks project

Literacy builders work with families in their homes

Builders work with parents and children,with parents gradually taking over

Builders provide follow-up support by telephone


Help your child to read and write
Help Your Child to Read projectand Write

For parents of school-age children

Provides strategies for parents to usein helping their children withreading and writing


Literacy and Parenting Skills project

Provides literacy and parenting skills workshops

Groups choose from 14 parenting topics

Parents learn to model good literacy practiceswith their children


Two programmes in French project

  • Grandir avec les livres

    • Parents and caregivers of children birth to 4 years old

    • Workshops increase awareness of early learning andfoster interest in reading

  • Contes sur roues

    • Follow-up to Grandir avec les livres

    • Parents and caregivers of childrenup to 4 years old

    • Home or daycare visitor modelsreading activities, leavesresources for family or daycareto use


Parent-Child Mother Goose / Rhymes That Bind project

For parents and veryyoung children

Develops oral language through rhymes and songs

Promotes positive parenting


Storysacks project

‘Sacks’ contain a story book, toys, and props

Language games and ideas for use arealso included

They can be used in families, daycares, libraries,and other settings


Pcls supports a training strategy
PCLS - Supports a Training Strategy project

  • Foundational training

  • Models training

  • Training sessions designed to meet the specific needs of key stakeholders


Foundational training
Foundational training project

  • Offered in person or on-line

  • Covers 10 topics considered essential to organize and offer a family literacy programme

  • Each topic is presented in a three hour session

  • Participants are given a manual that covers all the information presented and more

  • Currently being adapted as a credit course through a community college


10 chapters 10 topics

Understanding Family Literacy project

The Practice of Family Literacy in an Unjust World

The Dynamics of Working with Parents

Understanding Children and their Development

Understanding Emergent Literacy

Working with Families in a Family Literacy Setting

10 chapters - 10 topics


10 chapters 10 topics1

Working with Communities project

Administering a Family Literacy Project

Evaluating Family Literacy Projects

Best Practices in Family Literacy

10 chapters - 10 topics


Models training
Models training project

  • Training is provided on specific programme models

  • Offered during a two or three day institute in a central location - or in the community


Targeted training
Targeted training project

  • Training is provided to targeted groups requiring a specific emphasis. Examples of such groups include:

    • Community health workers

    • Day-care workers

    • Home-visitors

  • Introductory session on Family Literacy (2-3 hours)


Research
Research project

Overview

  • General state of research in Family Literacy in Canada

  • Two case studies


General state of research
General State of Research project

  • Traditionally, priority placed on applied research.

  • NLS is moving away from applied research

  • Rapidly developing area of research by the academic community

  • Research tends to be in specialized areas

  • A clearinghouse for research is CLLRNet


Cllrnet canadian language and literacy research network
CLLRNet ( projectCanadian Language and Literacy Research Network)

  • Multidisciplinary research program integrates contributions from the many sectors involved in children's language and literacy development, including basic and applied scientists, educators, clinicians, students, parents and caregivers, and industrial and government partners.


Cllrnet canadian language and literacy research network1
CLLRNet ( projectCanadian Language and Literacy Research Network)

  • Currently more than 50 projects

  • For more information on CLLRNet and the research programmes:

    • www.cllrnet.ca

    • www.cllrnet.ca/index.php?fa=Research.show


Ontario study french
ONTARIO STUDY - FRENCH project

“For my Child:A Study of the Impact of French-Language Family Literacy Programs on Francophone Families in Linguistic Minority Settings in Ontario

“Pour mon enfant d’abord: Étude de l’impact de l’alphabétisation familiale sur les familles vivant en milieu minoritaire en Ontario”


For my child purpose
For my Child: projectPurpose

To assess the changes observed in literacy habits and in use of French among parents and children who have been involved in one of the French-language literacy programs offered by seven French language literacy centres in Ontario.


For my child methodology
For my Child: projectMethodology

  • Semi-directed interviews with the participating parents, their literacy trainers, and the directors of these centres.

  • Questionnaire used to guide the interview


For my child methodology1
For my Child: projectMethodology

  • Interviews with participants conducted at the start of the programme and at the end - using the same questionnaire.

  • Interviews with facilitators and coordinators conducted at the end of the programme


For my child methodology2
For my Child: projectMethodology

  • Cohort 1 - a total of 52 families involved

    • 52 women and 10 men interviewed

  • Cohort 2+3 - a total of 177 families

    • 161 women and 31 men interviewed


For my child typology of programmes cohort 1
For my Child: projectTypology of programmes - cohort 1

  • Six programmes had direct parent and children involvement

  • Three programmes had direct parent involvement and indirect impact on the child


For my child typology of programmes cohorts 2 3
For my Child: projectTypology of programmes - cohorts 2 + 3

  • Six programmes had direct parent and children involvement

  • One programme had direct parent involvement and indirect impact on the child


For my child findings
For my Child: projectFindings

  • Few adults with low literacy skills participated in these family literacy programs.

  • More parents and children spontaneously used French in daily literacy and non-literacy related activities


For my child findings1
For my Child: projectFindings

  • Children increased French vocabulary

  • Children were more likely to comply with a routine and follow instructions.

  • Children developed a feeling of belonging with the French language and associated it with pleasant activities.

    (as observed by parents)


For my child findings2
For my Child: projectFindings

Family literacy programmes had a major positive impact on parents in two respects:

  • on the parents’ parenting skills,

  • on their learning and their use of French.


More specifically the parents who participated in these programs now
More specifically, the parents who participated in these programs now:

  • apply the parenting strategies that they have learned, especially as regards disciplining their children and encouraging their interest in reading and writing;

  • say that they are better equipped to play their role as parents;

  • have become aware that any activity can be a learning activity;

  • have a better grasp the importance of using French in the home;

  • engage in more activities with their children, especially in French.


For my child findings3
For my Child: programs now:Findings

Family literacy programs play an important role in the growth and development of the Francophone community.

  • Increased enrolment of participants’ children in French schools

  • Increased participation in community activities


Learning Together programs now:

The Learning Together program offers sessions for parents, an early childhood development program for the children, and then joint sessions in which parents and children interacted around literacy events.

The Learning Together program was developed as part of a longitudinal study conducted by the University of Alberta. The results were published in a book: Family Literacy Matters: A Longitudinal Parent-Child Literacy Intervention Study Linda M. Phillips, Ruth Hayden, and Stephen P. Norris

Data presented in the following slides is drawn from this study.


Learning Together programs now:

  • Eight key units for each:

  • Adult component

  • Early years component

  • Joint sessions component

  • * Programme developed by the Centre for Family Literacy borrowed heavily from BSA (Basic Skills Agency) programme model, taken from the book - Family Literacy Works (Brooks et al. 1996)


Learning together themes for each unit
Learning Together: Themes for each unit programs now:

  • Creative play

  • Developing language and literacy

  • Games

  • Beginning with Books

  • Early reading

  • Writing and drawing

  • Environmental print

  • Advice and guidance


Learning together themes for each unit1
Learning Together: Themes for each unit programs now:

  • Facilitators advised and encouraged to “respect and build on parents’ existing skills and abilities within each of the units…”

  • Facilitators required expertise and skills in their respective areas - working with adults and working in early childhood development.


Learning together timeframe
Learning Together: Timeframe programs now:

  • Three mornings or afternoons per week

  • Over three month period

  • Total of 90 hours


Learning together timeframe1
Learning Together: Timeframe programs now:

  • Separate adult session

  • Separate early-years session

  • Each has its own facilitator

  • Last 30 minutes each day, parents are paired with their child. Facilitators remained in the room to oversee.


Learning together methodology
Learning Together: Methodology programs now:

  • 13 week pilot study helped refine programme model and research tools

  • Treatment groups of children and parents compared with control/comparison groups

  • 158 children participated in five sites - 3 urban and 2 rural


Learning together assessment tools children
Learning Together: Assessment tools - Children programs now:

  • Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test

  • Test of Early Reading Ability(TERA - 2 Forms A & B)

  • Test of Early Reading Ability(TERA - 3 Forms A & B)


Learning together assessment tools adults
Learning Together: Assessment tools - Adults programs now:

  • Canadian Adult Reading Assessment (CARA)

  • Graded Word List

  • Graded Passages


Learning together interviews and observations
Learning Together: Interviews and Observations programs now:

  • Pre and post programme interviews conducted with all participants

  • Yearly follow-up interviews conducted around the anniversary of the completion of the programme

  • Each programme observed by one of the researchers for a minimum of 2 hours


Learning together findings
Learning Together: Findings programs now:

  • The program had a positive influence on all children except those who were already in the top 20 – 30% at the pretest stage.

  • Participant parents acquired and implemented more frequent and varied literacy activities at home than the control group parents.

  • Participant parents also reported being more confident and secure in their own ability to help their children.


Learning together findings1
Learning Together: Findings programs now:

  • The program was most effective for children with the greatest need.

  • No specific increase in the parents’ literacy levels because of the short length of the program

  • There were qualitative improvements in the parent’s ability to advance the literacy levels of their children.


Learning together lessons learned
Learning Together: Lessons learned programs now:

  • Recruitment of participants, especially for the control group was very difficult and required a significant amount of resources (staff time and money)

  • Particularly difficult to identify and recruit control group participants that mirrored the treatment group.

  • Require a longer and more intensive adult literacy component to make a difference.

  • Need to examine impact of less intensive programmes


Learning together lessons learned1
Learning Together: Lessons learned programs now:

  • Need to better understand cultural and social differences and how they effect literacy development

  • Need to use the research to develop policy and practice that best utilizes limited resources and ensures the use of the most appropriate strategies for a given group


ad