1 / 37

Low-Moisture A nhydrous A mmonia (LMAA) Pretreatment of Corn S tover

This study explores the effectiveness of LMAA pretreatment on corn stover for efficient ethanol production and long-term storage. Optimization experiments and storage experiments were conducted to evaluate the results.

Download Presentation

Low-Moisture A nhydrous A mmonia (LMAA) Pretreatment of Corn S tover

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Low-Moisture Anhydrous Ammonia (LMAA) Pretreatment of Corn Stover Minliang Yang Ming-Hsun Cheng Xiong Cao Kurt A. Rosentrater Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University

  2. Outline • Introduction • Overall Objectives • Optimization Experiments • Storage Experiments • Conclusions

  3. Introduction Procedure of ethanol production Pretreatment is required for efficient hydrolysis. Hydrolysis Glucose (Fermentable) Cellulose (Glucan, β-1,4-glucose)

  4. Introduction Pretreatment Pretreatment / Incubation Hydrolysis / Fermentation

  5. Overall Objectives • Can we do it? How well does LMAA work? • Will LMAA help storage? • How much will LMAA cost?

  6. Optimization Experiments

  7. Batch Reactors • Sealed batch reactor (690mL): • Optimized Conditions: • 0.1 g ammonia/g biomass, 80°C, 84h • Results: • 89% of the maximum theoretical ethanol yield • 24.9 g/L ethanol production in fermentation • Scaled-up reactor (3L): 4 x larger • Conditions: • 0.1 g ammonia/g biomass, 75°C, 72h • Results: • 71.6% of the maximum ethanol yield • $3.86 /gal of bioethanol

  8. Phase One – Results • Glucan Digestibility of treated vs. untreated corn stover *Note: Conditions for untreated treatment: 50% moisture content and medium size; Conditions for optimal treatment: 72h, 75°C, 50% moisture content and medium size. Compared with untreated corn stover, LMAA pretreatment method greatly improved enzymatic digestibility (% improvement=119) 8

  9. Phase Two – Results • Glucan Digestibility of treated vs. untreated corn stover 71.6 ° ° *Note: Conditions for untreated treatment: 50% moisture content and medium size; Conditions for optimal treatment: 72h, 75°C, 50% moisture content and medium size. Compared with untreated corn stover, LMAA pretreatment method greatly improved enzymatic digestibility (% improvement=213)

  10. Phase Two – Results 71.6 60.3 58.0 * Note: Conditions for 144h treatment: 144h, 120C, 80% moisture content and large size; Conditions for 24h treatment: 24h, 120C, 80% moisture content and large size. Longer incubation time may improve digestibility, but not very obvious. *Note: Conditions for 20C treatment: 24h, 20C, 80% moisture content and small size; Conditions for 120C treatment: 24h, 120C, 80% moisture content and small size. Lower incubation temperature may improve digestibility compared with higher.

  11. Original setup Modified setup Experimental Modifications Output Input Input Output Ammonia loading: 0.1 g/g biomass 0.18 g/g biomass • Optimization of LMAA conditions • Increase glucan digestibility • Ammonia diffusion • Hydrolysis conditions

  12. Ammoniation & Pretreatment Modifications Pretreatment Conditions • Ammonia pressure • Original setup: 0.1 g NH3/g biomass (db) • Increase NH3 loading: 0.18 gNH3/ g biomass (db) • Biomass moisture content • 50% (DM) • Ammoniation time • Original setup: 30 min • Increase to 80 min • Incubation • Temperature: 75 oC • Time: 72 to 144h

  13. Enzymatic Hydrolysis Modifications NREL LAP (NREL, Enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP). 2008) • Enzyme loading • Original loading: 15 FPU Cellulase (GC220) • 30 CBU β-glucosidase (Novozyme 188) • Increase loading: 15 FPU Cellulase (GC220) • 60 CBU β-glucosidase (Novozyme 188) • Hydrolysis • Temperature: 75 oC • Time: 72 & 144 hr • RPM: 68

  14. Phase 3– Results Last year’s conditions • 0.1 g NH3 / g biomass (db) • 30 min ammoniation • 75 oC and 72 hr incubation • 15 FPU cellulose • 30 CBU β-glucosidase Results • Particle size smaller than 1mm • Digestibility: 46.8% • Particle size smaller than 0.5mm • Digestibility: 49.5%

  15. Phase 3 – Results New ammoniation and hydrolysis conditions • 0.1 g NH3 / g biomass (db) • 60 min ammoniation • 75 oC and 72 hr incubation • 15 FPU cellulose • 60 CBU β-glucosidase Results • No NH3 remained increased digestibility • Digestibility increased at least 20%

  16. Phase 3 – Results Ammoniation of corn stover with particle size smaller than 0.5 mm • 0.18 g NH3/ g biomass (DM) • 80 min ammoniation • 75 oC incubation • 72 and 144 hr incubation • 15 FPU cellulose • 60 CBU β-glucosidase Results • 3 days incubation • Digestibility: 85.19% • 6 days incubation • Digestibility: 85.57%

  17. Cost Impacts Unit cost of bioethanol based on optimized conditions: For the 85% digestibility results, we increased the ammonia loading from 0.1g ammonia / 1g biomass (db) to 0.18g ammonia /1g biomass (db), which increased 80% ammonia loading. Increased from $3.86/gal to $4.14/gal

  18. Impact of LMAA on Long-Term Storage

  19. Background • Why worry about storage? • Seasonal harvest • Stover not used immediately after the harvest • Among all base reagents, ammonia has been found to be very effective for preservation Source: http://www.ccur.iastate.edu/news/newsletters/2012/sep_oct/stoverproject.html

  20. Objectives • To evaluate the effect of the LMAA pretreatment on biomass quality, specifically, changes in carbohydrates, lignin, and ash content; • To optimize the storage time, and monitor the growth of fungi; • To compare the effects of sealed vs. open storage conditions • Help guide scale-up

  21. Methods • Grind corn stover to 2mm • Adjust moisture content to 20 wt.%, 40 wt.%, 60 wt.% • Ammoniated corn stover with ammonia loadings of 0, 0.1, 0.2 g NH3/g DM biomass • Transfer the ammoniated corn stover into various plastic containers and open bottles

  22. Methods • Place the pretreated corn stover for 6h, 1d, 5d, 12d, 30d, 60d, and 90d at ambient temperature (~21°C) • Conduct composition analysis, mass loss and visible mold observation for the pretreated corn stover over time • Mold determined using an OCCULAR test • All experiments were run in duplicate Sealed bag Open bottle

  23. Results - Visible Mold Growth

  24. Results - Visible Mold Growth Sealed containers Mold observed in sealed bags after 16 days in Treatment 3 (60 wt.% M.C., no LMAA); 1 day later, Treatment 2 (40 wt.% M.C., no LMAA) also appeared; No other mold growth observed in 20% wt % , no LMAA until 90 days Open containers No mold growth observed for any treatments – due to moisture loss LMAA treatments resulted in no mold growth for all storage times or conditions

  25. Results - Mass Loss • Mass loss (g) in sealed bags Relationship between mass changes (wet basis) and time in sealed containers.

  26. Results - Mass Loss • Mass loss (g) in open bottles • Under the same moisture content, the higher ammonia loading (TRT 8,9) resulted in higher mass loss • 60 wt.% moisture content resulted in highest mass loss • Highly dependent on ambient temperature and humidity 20 wt.% corn stover 40 wt.% corn stover 60 wt.% corn stover

  27. Results - Glucan • No significant reduction was observed between open and sealed conditions

  28. Results - Xylan • No significant reduction was observed between open and sealed conditions. • Higher ammonia loading tended to retain more xylan

  29. Conclusions • LMAA pretreated corn stover could be well preserved up to 90 days without mold growth nor reduction in carbohydrates • Lignin removal was more obvious in sealed bags • Mass loss in 0.2- was higher than 0.1 g/g biomass

  30. Impacts • 3 MS Students • 1 PhD Student • 2013-2014 • 5 conference papers at ASABE • 2015 • 2 conference papers at ASABE

  31. Thank you!Any questions?

  32. Optimization Conditions Suggested optimize conditions (Incubation conditions): Time: 79hr; Temperature: 67°C Ammoniation: 0.1 g NH3/g biomass

  33. Regression analysis of the mass loss of the seal containers.

  34. Methods

  35. Results --- Mass Loss • Mass loss (g) in open bottles • Highly dependent on ambient temperature and humidity • Under the same moisture content, mass loss remained almost the same amongst the ammonia loadings • The higher the moisture content, the higher the mass loss 60 wt.% corn stover 20 wt.% corn stover 40 wt.% corn stover

  36. Results --- Ash • General trend • Higher M.C. led to higher ash content • With increasing time, the difference in ash content tended to decrease.

  37. Results --- Lignin • Anhydrous ammonia has the potential to remove lignin.

More Related