How can parents know what is already mapped from what is uncharted
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 25

How Can Parents Know What Is Already Mapped From What Is Uncharted PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 80 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

How Can Parents Know What Is Already Mapped From What Is Uncharted. Walter H. Kaye MD Professor of Psychiatry Director, Eating Disorder Treatment and Research Program University of California San Diego Eatingdisorders.UCSD.EDU [email protected] Overview.

Download Presentation

How Can Parents Know What Is Already Mapped From What Is Uncharted

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


How can parents know what is already mapped from what is uncharted

How Can Parents Know What Is Already Mapped From What Is Uncharted

Walter H. Kaye MD

Professor of Psychiatry

Director, Eating Disorder Treatment and Research Program

University of California San Diego

Eatingdisorders.UCSD.EDU

[email protected]


Overview

Overview

  • Science and evaluation of treatment

    • But very limited evidence-based treatment

  • Standards of care – is this possible?

    • Data critical to making informed decisions

    • Complicated, many points of view

    • Consensus needed

    • UCSD treatment as a model

    • Worthwhile – gradually raise level of care


  • Coronary heart disease

    Coronary Heart Disease

    • Understanding of biology

    • Measures of extent of disease

      • Blood flow in heart arteries

    • Many replicated studies comparing various forms of treatment

      • Meds, stent, by-pass

    • Comparison of long-term outcome

      • Years after intervention

      • Some relationship to insurance coverage

    • Guidelines and training


    Eating disorders

    Eating Disorders

    • Limited understanding or agreement on cause

    • Behavioral assessments but no objective measures of underlying brain mechanisms

    • Few treatment studies

      • Reduce symptoms, improve outcome

      • No cures or reversal of temperament

    • Little long-term outcome data

    • Limited guidelines, training


    How do you know what is effective

    How Do You Know What Is Effective?

    • Vague claims and personal opinion

    • Trust me – this works

    • Of course we offer “XX” therapy

    • Outcome data

      • Done at discharge

      • Not published in a reputable journal


    Scientific method

    Scientific Method

    • Incremental advances

      • What do we know

      • What don’t we know

    • Rigorous Study (avoid bias)

      • Comparison of matched groups, large number of subjects

      • Reliable meaningful measures of response

    • Statistics – probability it is true

      • P =.05 1 in 20 possibility occur by chance

    • Publication in scientific journal

      • Peer review, Impact factor

    • REPLICATION,REPLICATION,REPLICATION


    Recent controlled an treatment trials

    Recent Controlled AN Treatment Trials

    Pike (NY; 03), 33 adult AN

    CBT vs. nutritional counseling, OP, 1 year

    Good outcome: CBT (44%) > nutrit coun (7%)

    Drop out/relapse: CBT (22%) < nutrit coun (73%)

    Halmi (NY, CA, MN; 05), 122 adult AN

    CBT vs. fluoxetine vs. combination, 1 year

    Overall dropout rate of 46%

    No difference between groups in survival in treatment

    McIntosh (New Zealand; 05), 56 adult AN

    CBT vs. IPT vs. nonspecific clinical management, 20 weeks

    70% did not complete or made small/no gains

    Nonspecific better than CBT or IPT

    Gowers (England; 07), 167 adolescent AN

    IP ED vs. OP ED vs. general adolescent services, 2 yr

    No differences in outcome between groups

    Full recovery in only 33% at 2 years


    Multiple studies show family based maudsley treatment is effective for adolescent an

    Multiple Studies Show Family Based (Maudsley) Treatment is Effective for Adolescent AN

    Russell et al (1987)—90% improvement in subgroup of with short-duration AN

    Le Grange et al (1992)—70% improvement

    Eisler et al (1997)—five year follow-up on Russell et al (1987) found improvements were maintained.

    Robin et al (1999)—90% improvement with family treatment compared to 65% with individual therapy

    Eisler et al (2000)—65% improvement in cohort

    Lock et al (2010) – superior to individual therapy at 1 year follow-up


    How can parents know what is already mapped from what is uncharted

    • How Do You Evaluate A Treatment Facility or Therapist?

    • Easy to claim expertise and good outcome

    • No standards or enforcement of performance


    What do we know

    What Do We Know?

    • Genetics, Biology, and Temperament

      • Perfectionism, achievement drive, anxiety, OC, etc

      • Powerful brain processes, but not well understood

  • Natural course of the illness

    • 50 to 70% recovered by mid 20’s

  • Few evidence based treatments: Maudsley, CBT, DBT, IPT, medication

    • Improve symptoms and outcome

    • Not cure or reversal of temperament

    • Challenge: Adult AN, Impulsive BN


  • Can science be translated into real life treatment

    Can Science Be Translated Into Real Life Treatment?

    • Do programs adopt this new knowledge?

    • Are therapists thoroughly trained, certified

      • Do they/would they use evidence based treatments?

  • Do programs prove their approach results in better sustained outcomes?

  • What about treatments not based on any valid evidence or theories?

    • Educated consumer approach?

    • Long term evolution


  • Evaluating treatment looking beyond the buzzwords

    Evaluating TreatmentLooking Beyond The Buzzwords

    • Who does the direct care of patients

      • Time, expertise, substance

  • Full time vs.parttime staffing

    • Communication, consistency

  • Are staff identified on web-site, etc.

    • Credentials, experience

  • Who is responsible

    • What is their ED expertise

    • Can they be contacted


  • Evaluating therapy and therapists

    Evaluating Therapy And Therapists

    • Few evidence based treatments or training

      • Thus staff competence, experience crucial

      • Warm, empathic, caring essential

  • What is their training/degrees

    • Bachelor, masters, PhD

    • Professional vs. APA accredited

  • Time spent in direct patient care

    • What is the staff/patient ratio in groups

  • How is staff trained and supervised

    • Who is in charge, how is this done

    • Do they recognize anxiety, depression, etc


  • Other treatment i ngredients

    Other Treatment Ingredients

    • Full time psychiatrist, medical coverage

    • Full time dietician and nutritional approach

    • Rate of weight gain

    • Binge purge behaviors

    • Individual, family expertise and availability

    • Do they publish, present, do research


    Re entry into the real world

    Re-entry Into The Real World

    • Have patients learned to cope in the real world

      • Have they learned constructive strategies

      • Manage anxiety, OCD, etc.

    • What are reasonable progress expectations

      • Have these been tested

    • Are significant others involved and prepared


    Outcome studies

    Outcome Studies

    • Compare admission to discharge

      • Not surprising shows improvement

      • But is it permanent?

  • Key - Long term follow up

    • Show sustained (1 to 2+ years) improvement

    • Data – could be supportive of adequate insurance coverage

  • Meaningful measures and changes


  • Ucsd treatment model

    UCSD Treatment Model

    • Goal

      • Patient care

      • Develop new treatment approaches

      • Train therapist

  • Evidence based (FBT, CBT, DBT)

  • Constructive skill learning

    • Based on neurobiology, temperament

  • Partial programs

    • Real life applications and preparation for life after discharge, involvement of significant others


  • Training patient care

    Training, Patient Care

    • Priority – Social skills

    • Expertise – 25 to 30 pt

      • Skills-based treatments

      • 7 PhD, 4 Psychiatrist, 5 SW/MS, 2 dieticians, 2 nurses, 2 techs

  • Training (15+% time)

    • 2 to 3 hr supervision + as needed

    • 1 hr lecture

    • 2 hr treatment team


  • How can parents help research

    How Can Parents Help Research

    • Data needed to show what is effective treatment for recovery

      • How behaviors are wired into the brain

      • Genetics

      • Developing better treatments

      • Outcome studies

      • Centers of excellence

  • Autism has been very successful

    • Congress, NIH, foundations, insurance co


  • Ed treatment references

    ED Treatment References

    Treatment Comparisons

    NICE National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines for AN and BN (Jan 2004)www.nice.org.uk

    Treatment Guidelines

    American Psychiatric Association. (2006) Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders, 3rd ed. American Psychiatric Association.

    Adolescent Medicine, Pediatrics, etc.


    Summary if what a program tells you sounds too good to be true it probably is

    SUMMARYIf what a program tells you sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

    • Scientific understanding, evidence basis of treatment evolving

    • Standards of care needed

      • Consensus driven (short term)

      • Data driven (long term)

    • Rigorous outcome data should be used to define insurance coverage


  • Login