1 / 18

A Review of Geocasting Protocols for a Mobile Ad Hoc Network

A Review of Geocasting Protocols for a Mobile Ad Hoc Network. 指導教授:許子衡 教授 報告學生:馬敏修. Outline. Introduction Geocast routing protocols 2.1Data-Transmission Oriented 2.1.1 Location Based Multicast (LBM) 2.1.2 Voronoi diagram based geocasting 2.1.3 GeoGRID 2.2 Routing-Creation Oriented

Download Presentation

A Review of Geocasting Protocols for a Mobile Ad Hoc Network

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Review of Geocasting Protocolsfor a Mobile Ad Hoc Network 指導教授:許子衡 教授 報告學生:馬敏修

  2. Outline • Introduction • Geocast routing protocols • 2.1Data-TransmissionOriented • 2.1.1 Location Based Multicast (LBM) • 2.1.2 Voronoi diagram based geocasting • 2.1.3 GeoGRID • 2.2 Routing-CreationOriented • 2.2.1 GeoTORA • 2.2.2 Mesh-basedGeocast Routing Protocol • Conclusions

  3. Introduction • A node inthe geocast region receives ageocast packet, it will flood the geocastpacket to all its neighbors. • Classify the five existing geocast protocols intotwo categories: Data-transmission oriented protocols and routing-creationoriented protocols.

  4. Data-TransmissionOriented(1/9) Location Based Multicast (LBM) GOAL of Protocol: LBM is to decrease deliveryoverhead of geocast packets, by reducing the forwarding space forgeocast packets, while maintaining accuracy of data delivery. Protocol Details: LBM is essentially identical to flooding data packets,with the modification that a node determines whether to forward ageocast packet further via one of two schemes.

  5. Data-TransmissionOriented(2/9) LBM Scheme 1: When a node receives a geocast packet, itwill forwardthe packet to its neighbors if it is within a forwarding zone;otherwise, it will discard the packet.

  6. Data-TransmissionOriented(3/9) LBM Scheme 2:A geocast packetshould be forwarded is based on the position of the sender node atthe transmission of the packet and the position of the geocast region.

  7. Data-TransmissionOriented(4/9) Voronoi diagram based geocasting GOAL of Protocol: The goal of the Voronoi diagram based geocastingprotocol is to increase the success rate and decrease the hopcount and flooding rate of LBM.

  8. Data-TransmissionOriented(5/9)

  9. Data-TransmissionOriented(6/9) GeoGRID GOAL of Protocol:GeoGRID uses location information, which defines the forwardingzone, and elects a special host (i.e, gateway) in each grid arearesponsible for forwarding the geocast packets. Protocol Details:Instead of every node in a forwardingzonetransmitting data, only gateway nodes take this responsibility.

  10. Data-TransmissionOriented(7/9) • There are two suggestions on how to send geocast packetsby GeoGRID: Flooding-Based GeoGRID and Ticket-Based GeoGRID. • Flooding-Based GeoGRID:Only gateways in every grid withinthe forwarding zone will rebroadcast the received geocast packets. • Ticket-Based GeoGRID:The geocast packets are still forwardedby gateway nodes, but not all the gateways in the forwarding zonewill forward each geocast packet.

  11. Data-TransmissionOriented(8/9)

  12. Data-TransmissionOriented(9/9) Gateway Election:The mobilehost nearest to the physical center of a grid is elected. Oncethis node is elected, it remains the gateway until it moves out of thegrid. • One problem of this selection process is when another potentialgateway roams closer to the physical center of the grid than the currentlyassigned gateway.

  13. Routing-CreationOriented(1/4) • One advantage of this kind of protocol is thereduced overhead in the transmission of data packets. • One disadvantage of thiskind of protocol is that it requires more latency and control overheadto create routes.

  14. Routing-CreationOriented(2/4) GeoTORA GOAL of Protocol: The goal of GeoTORA is to reduce the overheadof transmitting geocast packets via flooding techniques, whilemaintaining high accuracy. Protocol Details:TORA uses the notion of heights todetermine the direction of each link. Despite dynamic link failures, TORA attempts to maintain adestination-oriented directed acyclicgraph such that each node can reach the destination.

  15. Routing-CreationOriented(3/4) Mesh-basedGeocast Routing Protocol GOAL of Protocol: The protocol that uses a mesh for geocasting in an ad hoc environment in order to provide redundant paths between the source and the group members. • Protocol Details: Instead of flooding geocast packets, the Mesh-based Geocast Routing Protocol tries to create redundant routes via control packets.

  16. Routing-CreationOriented(4/4)

  17. Conclusions • Three data-transmission oriented protocols which selectively flood data packets • Two routing-creation oriented protocols which create routes to transmit data packets • Both the Flooding-Based GeoGRID protocol and the Ticket-Based GeoGRID protocol should reduce the overhead of the other two data-transmission oriented protocols presented

  18. Conclusions • Compared to data-transmission oriented protocols the overhead of GeoTORA is reduced. • Mesh-based Geocast Routing Protocol, multiple nodes in the geocast region will receive a geocast packet due to the redundant paths that are created between the source and the geocast region.

More Related