slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Disagreement, Delay, and Deficits

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 34

Disagreement, Delay, and Deficits - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 102 Views
  • Uploaded on

“ In the face of this lack of knowledge [about the consequences of the deficit], there was not much agreement on how important it was to reduce the deficit or how fast it needed to be done.”

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Disagreement, Delay, and Deficits' - gretel


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1
“In the face of this lack of knowledge [about the consequences of the deficit], there was not much agreement on how important it was to reduce the deficit or how fast it needed to be done.”

-Rubin (2003), summarizing her extensive interviews with legislators and other policymakers about the U.S. budget making process.

disagreement delay and deficits

Disagreement, Delay, and Deficits

Jessica Wallack

Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies

University of California, San Diego

why are fiscal and other reforms delayed
Distributional conflict …

… but how does distributional conflict turn into delay?

Theaccuracy, timeliness, and availabilityof social and economic data varies widely across countries.

When publicly available data is less timely and less accurate, policymakers rely more on heterogeneous private data or personal experience to determine the appropriate policy.

Greater reliance on private information leads to greater variance of beliefs about the world - more disagreement.

Disagreement among policymakers about the objective economic situation delays resolution of distributional conflict.

Why are fiscal (and other) reforms delayed?
slide4

Consequences of Inaccurate Information:

Mean Effect vs. Variance Effect

Mean Effect

Inaccurate common information

shifts average policymaker’s belief

Opinions about cost of deficit

The presence of common information reduces variation in beliefs…

… however, less accurate common information reduces variation less.

Variance Effect

Opinions about cost of deficit

findings
Findings

Countries with accurate economic statistics reduce high deficits faster than countries with less accurate economic statistics.

Executive-centered systems

also reduce high deficits faster

measuring information quality
Measuring Information Quality
  • Ideal Measures:
    • Reputation of data among policymakers in each country
    • Objective size of error in data
  • Feasible Measures:
    • Variance of price level estimates (Penn World Tables)
    • Information Index:
      • First Principal Component of:
        • Penn World Tables Variance (0.284)
        • Ability to Monitor: external data reputation (0.535)
        • World Bank Rating: coverage, frequency, timeliness (0.588)
third variables and other influences political and governance culprits
Third Variables and Other Influences: Political and Governance Culprits
  • Political Institutions (DPI)
    • Executive-centered (0) / Parliamentary (2)
    • # of veto players
    • Degree of polarization among veto players
    • Democracy (Polity IV Index)
  • Level of Development(log GDP per capita)
  • Transparency (ICRG, 0-6)
  • Quality of Bureaucracy (ICRG, 0-6)
  • Debt Burden(Lagged)
slide8

Spearman Correlations

Information Quality, Political Institutions, Governance

measuring delay
Measuring Delay
  • Deficits: A panel of “policy stance” observations.
    • Various Measures: (1) Primary, (2) Central Government, (3) Consolidated CG, (4) Public Sector
    • All measures scaled: + deficit, - surplus
  • Error Correction Model: Estimates percent of above – (country) average deficit eliminated annually.
    • Allows for Asymmetric Adjustment
    • Controls for economic fluctuations.
basic error correction model with asymmetric adjustment
Basic Error Correction Model with Asymmetric Adjustment

Δdt = α +β1(dj,t-1 – dj*) +β2T*(dj,t-1 – dj*) +α1 Shocksj,t-1 +vjt

β1 :Speed of deficit growth for relatively small deficits (-)

β2:Incremental effect on

adjustment speed for relatively large deficits (+)

β1 + β2:Speed of deficit reduction for relatively large deficits (-)

slide13

Significant Asymmetry

Control Variables: Growth Changes. Robust standard errors in parentheses

*** Significant at 1%; ** Significant at 5%; * Significant at 10%. (*) Significant at 15%.

political and information effects fixed effects with interaction terms
Political and Information Effects: Fixed Effects with Interaction Terms

Δdt = α

+β1(dj,t-1 – dj*)

+β2 Tj,t-1*(dj,t-1 – dj*)

+β3 Infoj*(dj,t-1 – dj*)

+β4Infoj*Tj,t-1*(dj,t-1 – dj*)

+β5k Poljk *(dj,t-1 – dj*)

+β6k Poljk *Tj,t-1*(dj,t-1 – dj*)

+α1Tj,t-1 + α2Tj,t-1*Infoj

+ α3kTj,t-1*Poljk

+ α4Shocksj,t-1 +μj+ɛjt

Sum gives “Information Effect” on deficit reduction speed

Sum gives “Political Effect” on deficit reduction speed

slide15

Slow Adjustment, Below-Average Information Quality

Deficit Reduction

Speed: -0.281

Information

Rating: 0.6

slide16

Medium Adjustment, Below Average Information Quality

Deficit Reduction Speed: - 0.417

Information

Rating: 0.60

slide17

Faster Adjustment, Better Information Quality

Deficit Reduction Speed: -0.596

Information

Rating: 0.8

slide18

Medium Adjustment, Best Information Quality

Deficit Reduction Speed: -0.468

Information

Rating: 1

slide19

Fast Adjustment, Best Information Quality

Deficit Reduction Speed: -1.070

Information Rating: 1.00

findings1
Findings
  • More accurate information associated with faster deficit reduction
  • Executive-Centered associated with faster deficit reduction than parliamentary government
  • Polarization, checks & balances, governance: no statistically significant effect.
slide21

Effect of Information Accuracy on Deficit Reduction Speed: (b3 + b4 )

Extra percentage points of above-average deficit reduced in a given year from having maximum (1) information quality instead of minimum (0).

slide22

Effect of Information Accuracy on Deficit Reduction Speed (Information Index)

Extra percentage points of above-average deficit reduced in a given year from an increase of 1 standard deviation of information index.

information and economic outcomes
Information and Economic Outcomes
  • Demonstrated connection between information quality and speed of policy change
  • Implication: better data improves policymaking as well as policy.
    • credible economic and social data speeds reform
    • important to provide policymakers with information they perceive as relevant and useful.
new avenues for research
New Avenues for Research
  • Why is more accurate economic information associated with faster reform?
  • Testing “variance effect” more directly:
      • Interaction with country institutions, specific reform settings
      • Interaction with underlying disagreement
  • Other questions to ask about data:
      • Bias of data providers
      • Timeliness
  • What factors lead to investment in better publicly available information?
slide29
“In the face of this lack of knowledge [about the consequences of the deficit], there was not much agreement on how important it was to reduce the deficit or how fast it needed to be done.”

-Rubin (2003), summarizing her extensive interviews with legislators and other policymakers about the U.S. budget making process.

slide30

Significant Asymmetry

Benchmark: Sustainable Deficit

Control Variables: Growth Changes. Robust standard errors in parentheses

*** Significant at 1%; ** Significant at 5%; * Significant at 10%. (*) Significant at 15%.

slide31

Effect of Information Accuracy on Deficit Reduction Speed: (b3 + b4 )

Benchmark: “Sustainable” Deficit

Extra percentage points of above-average deficit reduced in a given year from having maximum (1) information quality instead of minimum (0).

adjustment speed and information quality ols on country estimates
Adjustment Speed and Information Quality(OLS on Country Estimates)

Robust standard errors in parentheses.

adjustment speed and information quality ols on country estimates1
Adjustment Speed and Information Quality(OLS on Country Estimates)

Robust standard errors in parentheses.

ad