1 / 21

The 17 th Networkconference in University Pedagogics H øgskolen i Lillehammer

Making the Search for Quality a Meaningful Exercise Professor Vaneeta D’Andrea Central Saint Martins, London, UK. The 17 th Networkconference in University Pedagogics H øgskolen i Lillehammer 24.-25. oktober 2007. Definitions of Quality in Higher Education.

Download Presentation

The 17 th Networkconference in University Pedagogics H øgskolen i Lillehammer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Making the Search for Quality a Meaningful ExerciseProfessor Vaneeta D’Andrea Central Saint Martins, London, UK The 17th Networkconference in University Pedagogics Høgskolen i Lillehammer 24.-25. oktober 2007

  2. Definitions of Quality in Higher Education • elusive as pervasive --- self contradictory • political --- linked to far-reaching policies • sensitive --- requires look at strengths & weaknesses • multi-dimensional & subjective --- overvalued measurable indicators • good systems are linked to higher education's two major qualities • intrinsic --- related to ideals to seek knowledge & truth • extrinsic --- services to society Source: van Vught (1994)

  3. Types of Quality • Quality as the outstanding ('excellence') • Quality as realisation of specific • standards ('zero errors) • Quality as relevance ('fitness for purpose') • Quality in relation to inputs ('value for money') • Quality as change ('transformation') Source: Harvey & Green (1993)

  4. Types of Higher Education Quality Reviews • Quality accreditation • Quality assessment • Quality assurance • Quality audit • Quality control • Quality development • Quality enhancement • Quality improvement • Quality monitoring Source: Lauvås, 2000

  5. Definitions I Use quality assurance: any regulatory process of quality review quality assessment: any summative quality review process quality enhancement: a formative quality review process quality development: one type of quality enhancement

  6. Quality Development Focus on transformation and educational development: • quality as dynamic process • emphasis on curriculum, learning and teaching • effective action & appropriate change at teaching/learning interface • process non-burdensome Sources: Horsburgh, 1999; Lauvås, 2000

  7. Features of Quality Development Model • emphasis on educational experience, not documentation • emphasis on outcomes, not scores • driven by scholarly reflection, not a methodology • replaces trust in academics • potential to achieve fundamental changes

  8. Benefits of Quality Development Model • provides support for departments to enhance learning experience • less duplication of effort • a more holistic understanding of relationship between quality assurance and quality enhancement • more effective dissemination of educational policies • greater consistency of standards across the institution • increases student support • encourages scholarly reflection on learning and teaching

  9. Quality Development Model: Example 1 Peer Observation Based on following principles: feedback is confidential, process separated from institution’s evaluation of performance, universal application, underpinned by observers educated in appropriate methods

  10. Quality Development Model: Example 2 Student Evaluations Based on following principles: students views used as basis of dialogue about curriculum, focused on outcomes rather than academic's performance, promotes approaches to learning

  11. Quality Development Model: Example 3 Outcomes-Based Curriculum Design Based on following principles: greater transparency, used for valid educational reasons, part of a larger repertoire of curriculum design approaches

  12. Summary Quality Development Model promotes: • continuous quality improvement and development • replaces shame and blame with name and claim • value for time as well as money

  13. Building on Quality Development Model • learning is a transformative process (Harvey, 2002) • quality reviews in higher education are more useful when premised on theories of teaching and learning • a potential outcome of quality reviews is the transformation of teaching and learning (D’Andrea & Gosling, 2005)

  14. Quality Review Theories: 1 Two dominant theoretical frameworks: 1) the regulatory assurance function 2) the enhancement improvement function Competing or overlapping?

  15. Quality Review Theories: 2 Where does learning theory fit into this analysis? Major Categories of Learning Theory: • Behaviourist • Cognitivist • Humanist • Social and situational

  16. Quality Development Model & Humanist Learning Theory Examples: • Shift from teaching to learning: student centredness (Barr & Tagg, 1995)

  17. Quality Development and Social & Situational Learning Theory Examples: • appreciative inquiry (Cooperrider & Srivastra 1987, Cooperrider & Whitney 1999, Bushe 2005) • communities of practice (Wenger 2004)

  18. Quality Development and the overlap of behaviourist & humanist learning theories Examples: • student evaluations as a summative process (behaviourist) • student evaluations as a formative process (humanist)

  19. Summary of Learning Theory Applied to Quality Reviews Examples Considered: Humanistic Theory Learning paradigms Assessment theory Behaviourist Theory Assessment theory Social & Situational Appreciative inquiry Communities of practice

  20. Remaining Questions Can learning theory also inform the: • quality assessment approach? • quality assurance approach?  Will applying learning theory to quality reviews make them a more meaningful exercise?

  21. Contact Details Professor Vaneeta-marie D’Andrea Central Saint Martins College of Art & Design University of the Arts Southampton Row London, England WC1B 4AP Email: v.d-andrea@csm.arts.ac.uk T: 44+ (0)20 7514 7059

More Related