1 / 12

10 Febuary 2012 Marieke de Ruyter de Wildt

Achieving and measuring results of PSD interventions Seminar 1: Impact logics, indicators and methods. 10 Febuary 2012 Marieke de Ruyter de Wildt. Who’s here. DGIS, DEC, EL&I, IOB Agentschap NL, CBI, FMO, PUM, Agriterra , Utz

graham-mcneil
Download Presentation

10 Febuary 2012 Marieke de Ruyter de Wildt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Achieving and measuring results of PSD interventions Seminar 1: Impact logics, indicators and methods 10 Febuary2012 Marieke de Ruyter de Wildt

  2. Who’s here • DGIS, DEC, EL&I, IOB • AgentschapNL, CBI, FMO, PUM, Agriterra, Utz • ISS, PRC, 3ie, consultant, CDI and LEI Shared interest to improve result measurement

  3. Seminar series • 1of 3 Seminars. Other seminars will evolve from today • Other DGIS activities to enhance result measurement Objective • General: to gain knowledge on how to measure results • Specific: to inform Evaluation Plans of PSD platform

  4. PSD Platform =

  5. Workinggroup on ResultMeasurement • March 2011: ‘Managing forResult System developedandapprovedby DDE and IOB’ • 7 meetings sincetovisualiseexisting systems andwherepossibleharmonise • GuidedbyMfDR (MGDs: eg alignprogramming and M&E withresults) & DCED (PSD: resultchainsand indicators) • Oct 2011: Protocol

  6. Evaluation Protocol for PSD Platform • Resultchains • Relationtoother PSD programs • Indicators at output, outcomeandifpossible impact level • Responsibility of PSD organisation • Independent externaljudgementand transparant validation • Baseline andcontrol group... or othercounterfactual • Respresentative sample • Costsfor PSD organisationproportional Allneedto have Evalutation Plan by May 2012

  7. Elements of Evaluation Plans • Result Chain of organisations/instruments • Essentialandmeasurable indicators • Measurementmethodology Wherepossibleapply DCED standard

  8. PSD Platform Result Chain = DCED Strong interest from members to learn and share with Platform. If possible harmonise indicators Low complexity of measuring attribution. Indicators are organisation specific

  9. CurrentState Evaluation Plans? • PUM • CBI • FMO • Agentschap NL

  10. Common challenges = Agenda today • How to make good result chains? • What key questions: to report, learn or steer, or all? • What indicators to use? • Immediate results = proof and improve (‘downward accountability’) • Ultimate results = proof and report (‘upward accountability’) • Intermediate Outcomes = middlefield (‘research for impact’) • What are lean methods for ‘open systems’: how to attribute?

  11. Some basics • Measurement = Evaluation < ---> Monitoring • Impact logic = theory of change = new log frame • Key elements of measurement • Impact logics • Questions • Indicators at various levels • Lean methods

  12. Open Floor What are your most pressing bottlenecks toprogress on resultmeasurement • Technical issues - blue • Rules of the game - yellow • Internalprocesses - white

More Related