Achieving and measuring results of psd interventions seminar 1 impact logics indicators and methods
Download
1 / 12

10 Febuary 2012 Marieke de Ruyter de Wildt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 101 Views
  • Uploaded on

Achieving and measuring results of PSD interventions Seminar 1: Impact logics, indicators and methods. 10 Febuary 2012 Marieke de Ruyter de Wildt. Who’s here. DGIS, DEC, EL&I, IOB Agentschap NL, CBI, FMO, PUM, Agriterra , Utz

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' 10 Febuary 2012 Marieke de Ruyter de Wildt' - graham-mcneil


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Achieving and measuring results of psd interventions seminar 1 impact logics indicators and methods
Achieving and measuring results of PSD interventions Seminar 1: Impact logics, indicators and methods

10 Febuary2012 Marieke de Ruyter de Wildt


Who s here
Who’s here

  • DGIS, DEC, EL&I, IOB

  • AgentschapNL, CBI, FMO, PUM, Agriterra, Utz

  • ISS, PRC, 3ie, consultant, CDI and LEI

    Shared interest to improve result measurement


Seminar series
Seminar series

  • 1of 3 Seminars. Other seminars will evolve from today

  • Other DGIS activities to enhance result measurement

    Objective

  • General: to gain knowledge on how to measure results

  • Specific: to inform Evaluation Plans of PSD platform



Working group on result measurement
Workinggroup on ResultMeasurement

  • March 2011: ‘Managing forResult System developedandapprovedby DDE and IOB’

  • 7 meetings sincetovisualiseexisting systems andwherepossibleharmonise

  • GuidedbyMfDR (MGDs: eg alignprogramming and M&E withresults) & DCED (PSD: resultchainsand indicators)

  • Oct 2011: Protocol


Evaluation protocol for psd platform
Evaluation Protocol for PSD Platform

  • Resultchains

  • Relationtoother PSD programs

  • Indicators at output, outcomeandifpossible impact level

  • Responsibility of PSD organisation

  • Independent externaljudgementand transparant validation

  • Baseline andcontrol group... or othercounterfactual

  • Respresentative sample

  • Costsfor PSD organisationproportional

    Allneedto have Evalutation Plan by May 2012


Elements of evaluation plans
Elements of Evaluation Plans

  • Result Chain of organisations/instruments

  • Essentialandmeasurable indicators

  • Measurementmethodology

    Wherepossibleapply DCED standard


Psd platform result chain dced
PSD Platform Result Chain = DCED

Strong interest from members to learn and share with Platform.

If possible harmonise indicators

Low

complexity of measuring attribution. Indicators are organisation specific


Current s tate evaluation plans
CurrentState Evaluation Plans?

  • PUM

  • CBI

  • FMO

  • Agentschap NL


Common challenges agenda today
Common challenges = Agenda today

  • How to make good result chains?

  • What key questions: to report, learn or steer, or all?

  • What indicators to use?

    • Immediate results = proof and improve (‘downward accountability’)

    • Ultimate results = proof and report (‘upward accountability’)

    • Intermediate Outcomes = middlefield (‘research for impact’)

  • What are lean methods for ‘open systems’: how to attribute?


Some basics
Some basics

  • Measurement = Evaluation < ---> Monitoring

  • Impact logic = theory of change = new log frame

  • Key elements of measurement

    • Impact logics

    • Questions

    • Indicators at various levels

    • Lean methods


Open floor
Open Floor

What are your most pressing bottlenecks toprogress on resultmeasurement

  • Technical issues - blue

  • Rules of the game - yellow

  • Internalprocesses - white


ad