1 / 15

Application of the Competitive Dialogue in Practice

Application of the Competitive Dialogue in Practice. Glenn Fletcher Achilles Information Ltd. “The New Public Procurement Procedures and Instruments” Ankara, Turkey – 5-6 February 2008. Issues to be covered. When should competitive dialogue be used? What contracts has it been used for?

gordon
Download Presentation

Application of the Competitive Dialogue in Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Application of the Competitive Dialogue in Practice Glenn Fletcher Achilles Information Ltd “The New Public Procurement Procedures and Instruments” Ankara, Turkey – 5-6 February 2008

  2. Issues to be covered • When should competitive dialogue be used? • What contracts has it been used for? • What lessons have been learned so far?

  3. When should competitive dialogue be used? • A new procedure intended for contracts so complex that open and restricted procedures are impractical • Effectively replaces the negotiated procedure with a call for competition (which had been used by UK for ‘public private partnership’ contracts which required innovation and risk transfer)

  4. When should competitive dialogue be used? • The procurement legislation emphasises the importance of non-discrimination and the transparency of procedures and decisions • It therefore regards negotiation with suspicion and negotiated procedure is relatively rarely used (represents less than 10% of UK contracts advertised in the OJ?)

  5. When should competitive dialogue be used? • Many large contracts require a degree of dialogue between contracting authority and supplier • Authorities were therefore perhaps using negotiated procedures inappropriately or were negotiating (wrongly) within open or restricted procedures

  6. When should competitive dialogue be used? • The new procedure was designed to allow a degree of negotiation in these complex contracts… • …whilst retaining a tendering stage to ensure that the authority’s discretion was suitably limited… • …to ensure non-discrimination • The procedure is very similar to the ‘best and final offer approach’ used for some time in UK and elsewhere

  7. When should competitive dialogue be used? • Where the contracting authority is not able objectively to define the technical means to meet its objective (e.g. complex information systems) • Or is not able objectively to specify the legal/financial make up of the project (e.g. design build and operate projects) • And where the authority considers that open or restricted procedures would not allow the award of the contract

  8. What contracts has it been used for? • Major information systems contracts (databases, back office computer systems, network services) • Public private partnership contracts (where supplier innovation is required and risk is transferred to the supplier) (prisons, hospitals, schools, urban redevelopment schemes)

  9. What contracts has it been used for – statistics from January 2008 search of OJ database • Competitive Dialogue contract notices amounted to 1717 of 294849 total contract notices published in the period (2006-2007) • So far no Competitive Dialogue contract award notices have been published • Contract notice statistics for selected countries (2006-2007) • France 670 • UK 658 • Germany 61 • Italy 3 • Ireland 44 • Denmark 21 • Netherlands 33

  10. What contracts has it been used for – sample contracts • Admission tests for the selection of students for undergraduate medical programmes. • Urban regeneration works • Medical information systems • Environmental-impact consultancy services • Insurance services • Fleet tankers for British Royal Navy • Design and construction of highway

  11. What lessons have been learned so far? • The procedure is unfamiliar to contracting authorities and suppliers • Thus care must be taken to ensure all understand the process • There are some aspects of the process that are unclear in practice • European Commission guidance is only in draft at present • No relevant European court cases

  12. What lessons have been learned so far? • Procurement using the procedure takes considerable time (1-2 years is not unusual) • This partly reflects the nature of the (very large) projects involved • Costs of preparing tenders can be very high • Some suppliers consider costs are greater using this procedure than where the negotiated procedure was used

  13. What lessons have been learned so far? • The process is very time and resource intensive for contracting authorities • Often the necessary technical resource is not available within the authority • Leading to cost/delays to acquire necessary consultancy • Meticulous planning at the start of the procurement process is essential to ensure success

  14. What lessons have been learned so far? • The process is best suited for large, high risk projects • Where the resource cost to the authority and suppliers is not disproportionate to the size of the benefits/profits to the parties • It is not an ‘easy option’ to compensate for inadequate thought by authorities about what they really need

  15. Conclusions • Competitive Dialogue has aroused great interest amongst contracting authorities • There is little experience so far with this new procedure but it is often used for projects in substitution for the negotiated procedure with a call for competition • Authorities have welcomed the fact that use of the procedure is relatively easy to justify • Careful planning and the deployment of adequate resources is essential to the successful operation of the procedure

More Related