1 / 63

TGai - Motion/Straw Poll-July-2012-San-Diego

TGai - Motion/Straw Poll-July-2012-San-Diego. Authors:. Date: 2012-07-17. Abstract. This document is a composite of all 802.11TGai motions / straw polls at the July 2012 San Diego session. Plus amendments and results from the meeting.

goldy
Download Presentation

TGai - Motion/Straw Poll-July-2012-San-Diego

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TGai- Motion/Straw Poll-July-2012-San-Diego Authors: • Date: 2012-07-17 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  2. Abstract • This document is a composite of all 802.11TGai motions / straw polls at the July 2012 San Diego session. • Plus amendments and results from the meeting. Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  3. Move to add the following Cls. to the TGai SFD under the "General" Section: • A FILS STA should be capable of announcing all of its operational channels that the STA is the Master of. • One possible approach to consider, is to include information in the neighbor report element that the STA sending this information is the Master of the channel referenced in the neighbor report. • A STA receiving this information is immediately enabled for accessing the channels under the AP issuing the neighborhood report is the Master of • (Note: Maybe a "time window" in which this enablement is "valid" has to be specified. A STA should not be able to immediately access a channel indicated under the control of a master if the neighborhood report had been received hours ago). • Moved:Katsuo • Seconded:Stephen • Yes 13 No 1 Abstain 27 • Passes Motion Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  4. Move to add the following text to Section 6.1 of SFD? • 6.1.X AP Operational Status • TGai compliant AP may include Operational Status information in Beacon and Probe Response. The information may be, for example: • BSS load, • BSS average access delay, • BSS available admission capacity • Moved: Katsuo • Seconded: Stephen Result • Yes: No: Abstain: • Motion to table • Moved: Roger • Seconded : Graham • Result • Yes: 31 No: 2 Abstain: 6 • Passes : Question was moved table Motion Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  5. Move to add the following text to the clause 6 of TGai Specification Framework document (11-12/0151r08): ” FILS STA is a QMF STA” Moved: Jarkko Seconded: Roger yes 12 no 13 abstain 17 Motion 1 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  6. Move to add the following text to the clause 6 of TGai Specification Framework document (11-12/0151r08): ” FILS STA is HT STA” Motion 2 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  7. Move to add the following text to the clause 6 of TGai Specification Framework document (11-12/0151r08): ” FILS STA is VHT STA” Motion 3 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  8. 12/772r01 Motion JarkkoKneckt Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  9. Motion • Move to add the following text to the clause 6 of TGai Specification Framework document (11-12/0151r09): • ” FILS Discoveryframesmaybetransmitted as non-HT duplicate PPDUs at 20MHz of the 20, 40, 80 and 160 MHz ( given the DFS ownership of the transmiter) at 5GHz band” • Moved : Jarkko • Seconded: Phillip • Yes 22 No 1 Abstain 6 • passes Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  10. 12/775r01 Stawpoll Steve Grau Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  11. Move to add the following text to Cls. 6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response of the TGai SFD (11/12/0151r9) “A FILS capable STA may include a probe response filtering bitmask element in a probe request as outlined in 11-12-0775r0. AFILS capable AP STA receiving a probe request with a probe response filtering bitmask element should apply the filter, as outlined in 11-12-0755r0, to omit issuing a probe response if the filter indicates a response is not required.” Mover: Steave Second: Lee yes 7 no 4 abstain 18 Failed Motion Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  12. 12/776r21 Straw poll1 Motion Giwon Park Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  13. Move to add following text to SFD, 12/0151r10? 5.3 Access Distribution • 802.11ai shall provide the mechanism for access distribution to achieve efficient utilization of the shared wireless channel by minimizing the access collision in case of large number of STA’s initial link setup. • Mover: Giwon • Seconder: Lee • Result • Yes 16 No 9 Abstain_____21__________ • Failed Motion Giwon Park, LG Electronics Inc.

  14. 12/780r11 Straw poll1 Motion Ping Fang Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  15. Do you support to add the FILS proposal defined in slide 7 of doc 12/780r1 into 11ai SFD security section? Yes 18 No 13 Abstain 17 Straw Poll Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  16. 12/786r22 Straw polls Lin Cai Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  17. Do you agree to add the sentence to TGai SFD, 12/0151r11. • “FILS devices shall support differentiated initial link setup.”? • Moved: Lin • Seconded: Roger • Yes: 37 • No: 1 • Abstain: 9 • Passes Motion Lin Cai et al ,Huawei.

  18. 12/788r12 Straw polls Lin Cai Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  19. In the active scanning state machine, do you agree to increase the scope of the ProbeTimer criteria to include the detection of an identifiable AP transmission in addition to CCA. Yes 19 No 13 Need more information 8 Straw Poll Lin Cai et al, Huawei.

  20. 12/789r34 Motions George Cherian Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  21. Add the following text to the SFD Subsection 4.1 “Pre-established security context” • The draft specification shall include • support for the EAP-RP [as defined in IETF RFC 5295/5296] for fast key establishment. • a nonce exchange and key confirmation that does not degrade the security of the 4-way handshake. • Moved : George • Seconded: Hitoshi • Yes/No/Abstain 42/0/12 • Motion passes (integrated into SFD) July 2012 Motion 1 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  22. Add the following text to SFD Subsection 4.1 “Pre-established security context” • The draft specification shall include optional support of Perfect Forward Secrecy as part of key establishment. • Moved: George • Seconded: Hitoshi • Yes/No/Abstain 27/2/20 • Motion passes (integrated into SFD) July 2012 Motion 2 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  23. Add the following text to Subsection 4.1 “Pre-established security context” • The key derivation handshake is started by ‘sending of Snonce first’ when EAP-RP is used for authentication • Moved :Geroge • Seconded:Jouni • Yes: 10 • No: 7 • Abstain: 13 • Failed Motion 3 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  24. Add the following text to Subsection 4.1 “Pre-established security context” • Non-AP STA shall support bundling of EAP-Reauth Initiate message with the Snonce in the Auth frame • Non-AP STA shall support bundling of EAP-Reauth Initiate message with the Snonce in the Auth frame when EAP-RP is used in authentication. • Moved : Geroge • Seconded: Dan • Yes: 17 • No: 8 • Abstain: 6 • Failed • Move to amend • Non-AP STA shall support bundling of EAP-Reauth Initiate message with the Snonce in the Auth frame when EAP-RP is used in authentication. • Moved : Rene • Seconded: Lei • Approved by unanimous consent Motion 4 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  25. Add the following text to Subsection 4.1 “Pre-established security context” • Option 1 from 11-12/0789r2 shall be supported. • Moved : Dan • Seconded:Jouni • Yes: 15 • No: 10 • Abstain: 10 Failed Motion 5 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  26. Add the following text to Subsection 4 of the Specification Framework Document under the heading “Key Confirmation” • The draft specification shall not specify confirmation of a key prior to both parties possessing the key to confirm. • Moved : Dan • Seconded: Paul • Yes: 15 • No: 0 • Abstain: 17 • Passes (integrated into SFD) Motion 6 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  27. 12/790r02 Straw polls2 Motions Young Hoon Kwon Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  28. Do you support including information of the FILS discovery frame transmission time of other BSSs in the contents of the FILS discovery frame? Yes: 10 No: 9 Abstain: 43 Straw Poll 1 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  29. Do you agree that non-AP STA may report FILS discovery frame transmission timing information of nearby APs? Yes: 19 No: 4 Abstain: 29 Straw Poll 2 Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  30. 12/794r24 Motions Rene Struik Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  31. Motion 1 • Add the following text to Subsection 4.1 “Pre-established security context” of the Security Framework Document: • The draft specification shall include support for a FILS authentication mechanism that does not require • online involvement of a third party for authentication (of course, it may involve it for authorization and • does not preclude online involvement for authentication). • Moved: Rene Struik • Seconded: Dan Harkins • Y/N/A: 18/0/22 • Motion passes (integrated into SFD) Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  32. Motion 2 • Add the following text to Subsection 4.1 “Pre-established security context” of the Security Framework Document: • The draft specification shall include support for a public-key based authenticated key agreement scheme as a mechanism for fast FILS authentication. • Moved: Rene Struik • Seconded: Dan Harkins • Y/N/A: 13/0/25 • Motion passes (integrated into SFD) Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  33. Motion 3 • Add the following text to Subsection 4.1 “Pre-established security context” of the Security Framework Document: • The draft specification shall include support for a public-key based authenticated key agreement scheme based on NIST approved schemes using ECDH and ECDSA at 128-bit cryptographic bit strength. • Moved: Rene Struik • Seconded: Dan Harkins • Y/N/A: 12/2/23 • Motion passes (integrated into SFD) Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  34. Motion 4 • Amend the motions #1, #2, #3 previously adopted to replace “Security Framework Document” by “Specification Framework Document”. • Moved: Rene Struik • Seconded: Jouni Malinen • Y/N/A: 29/0/4 • Passes Hiroshi Mano / ATRD

  35. Hiroshi Mano / ATRD 12/0896r05 Straw polls5Motions Jae Seung Lee(ETRI)

  36. Straw Poll #1 • Do you support to update the spec framework document with the following text under subsection “6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response”: • Non-AP STA may include its preferences on association with HT, VHT, or non-HT STA in the Probe Request frame for omission of Probe Response. • Yes 5 • No 15 • Abstain 10 Jae Seung Lee, ETRI

  37. Straw Poll #2 • Do you support to update the spec framework document with the following text under subsection “6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response”: • Non-AP STA may include its requirement on internet access in the Probe Request frame for omission of Probe Response. • Yes • No • Abstain Jae Seung Lee, ETRI

  38. Straw Poll #3 • Do you support to update the spec framework document with the following text under subsection “6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response”: • Non-AP STA may include its requirement on data confidentiality in the Probe Request frame for omission of Probe Response. • Yes • No • Abstain Jae Seung Lee, ETRI

  39. Straw Poll #4 • Do you support to update the spec framework document with the following text under subsection “6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response”: • Non-AP STA may include its security capability information in the Probe Request frame for omission of Probe Response. • Yes • No • Abstain Jae Seung Lee, ETRI

  40. Straw Poll #5 • Do you support to update the spec framework document with the following text under subsection “6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response”: • Non-AP STA may include its supported credential types in the Probe Request frame for omission of Probe Response. • Yes • No • Abstain Jae Seung Lee, ETRI

  41. Motion #1 • Move to update the spec framework document with the following text under subsection “6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response”: • Non-AP STA may include its preferences on association with HT, VHT, or non-HT STA in the Probe Request frame for omission of Probe Response. Moved: Seconded: • Yes No Abstain Jae Seung Lee, ETRI

  42. Motion #2 • Move to update the spec framework document with the following text under subsection “6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response”: • Non-AP STA may include its requirement on internet access in the Probe Request frame for omission of Probe Response. Moved: Seconded: • Yes No Abstain Jae Seung Lee, ETRI

  43. Motion #3 • Move to update the spec framework document with the following text under subsection “6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response”: • Non-AP STA may include its requirement on data confidentiality in the Probe Request frame for omission of Probe Response. Moved: Seconded: • Yes No Abstain Jae Seung Lee, ETRI

  44. Motion #4 • Move to update the spec framework document with the following text under subsection “6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response”: • Non-AP STA may include its security capability information in the Probe Request frame for omission of Probe Response. Moved: Seconded: • Yes • No • Abstain Jae Seung Lee, ETRI

  45. Motion #5 • Move to update the spec framework document with the following text under subsection “6.1.6 Omission of Probe Response”: • Non-AP STA may include its supported credential types in the Probe Request frame for omission of Probe Response. Moved: Seconded: • Yes • No • Abstain Jae Seung Lee, ETRI

  46. Hiroshi Mano / ATRD 12/0928r01 Motions Graham Smith(DSP Group)

  47. Graham Smith, DSP Group Motion • Add to the Specification Framework Document the following to a new subheading “General 5.1 ” : • “So as to reduce the chance of a Probe Request/Response storm, an AP may respond to a Probe Request (11ai Probe Request?) with a FILS Discovery frame” Moved: Graham Seconded: Lee • Yes 8 • No 15 • Abstain 14 • Failed

  48. Hiroshi Mano / ATRD 12/0928r23 Motions Graham Smith(DSP Group)

  49. Graham Smith, DSP Group Motion 1 • Add to the Specification Framework Document the following to a new subheading “General 6.1”: • “The proposal shall include method(s) for mitigating Probe Request/Response storms” • Moved: Graham • Seconded: Jarkko • Yes 32 No 0 Abstain 5 • Passes

  50. Graham Smith, DSP Group Motion 2 • Add to the Specification Framework Document the following to a new subheading “General 5.1”: • “The proposal shall include method(s) to enable a FILS network to encourage non-AP STAs to use passive rather than active scanning at a point where the use of active scanning causes the network to be in danger of being blocked and/or the available bandwidth to be restricted.” • Moved: Graham • Seconded:Phillip • Yes 9 No 21 Abstain 23

More Related