1 / 49

Thinking about Men and Masculinity

Thinking about Men and Masculinity. From Advancing Sexuality Studies: a short course on sexuality theory and research methodologies. The International Resource Network. Developed by:. The Caribbean International Resource Network Presented in collaboration with:

gladyst
Download Presentation

Thinking about Men and Masculinity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Thinking about Men and Masculinity From Advancing Sexuality Studies: a short course on sexuality theory and research methodologies The International Resource Network

  2. Developed by: The Caribbean International Resource Network Presented in collaboration with: The Institute for Gender & Development Studies at the University of the West Indies, St. Augustine (Trinidad & Tobago) With funding from The Ford Foundation & the International Association for the Study of Sexuality, Culture and Society (IASSCS) Available under an Attribution, Non-Commercial, Share Alike licence from Creative Commons 2

  3. Schedule

  4. Schedule (cont.)

  5. Module aims This module aims to: • Provide participants with an overview of contemporary sociological thinking about masculinity, men and men’s sexuality • Provide a theoretical account of the ways in which ideas about masculinity are changing and explore some of the effects of these changes for men, especially those in the Caribbean

  6. Participants will: • Develop a broad understanding of how masculinity has been conceptualised in gender and sexuality theory • Explore the impact of contemporary social and cultural processes related to globalisation and consumerism on practices of masculinity • Analyse contemporary debates in the field of masculinities related to sexuality and discuss possible future issues facing men at regional Caribbean and global scales

  7. Session 1.Contemporary understandings of men, masculinity and sexuality

  8. Role theory, the individual and masculine socialisation Men as problem: • Elevated negative health outcomes overall • Educational performance; workforce participation • Violence, accidents and risk-taking • Sexual difficulties • Suicide ideation and completion • Drug and alcohol use • Specific difficulties for Indigenous, social class, racial or minority ethnic populations

  9. “Traditional” (“Western”?) masculinity: Strong (physically and mentally) Rational In control/self-control Objective Unemotional Patriarchal “Traditional” masculinity

  10. “New Age Men” Metrosexual: • Young • Urban • Fashion conscious • Body conscious • Heterosexual

  11. Retrosexual: Technosexual:

  12. The male body/masculinity: If all one needs to be masculine is a male body, then any action by any male body can be understood as ‘masculine’ The body is not as reliable in defining the sexes as male and female as we are led to believe The problem of masculinity

  13. Sex roles and gender socialisation: • A sex role includes a number of normative expectations about how one should behave as male or female • Masculinity and femininity are socially constructed categories that elaborate upon “natural” sex differences • Masculinity is institutionalised in social structures such as the family, schooling, mass media and religion, where boys are socialised to become masculine

  14. Defining Gender Connell’s (1995) critique of sex role and gender socialisation: • Gender inequalities are explained in terms of biology • Difference is understood as deviation from the normative mode of masculinity or femininity • Gender roles are vague • Incapable of theorising change in gender relations • The individual subject is entirely the product of social structure • Supports the status quoby ignoring power relations

  15. Small group discussion • Discuss one of the following questions: • Can you think of examples where sex role theory, or socialisation theory is used to explain gender relations in your own community? • How are boys and men understood to become ‘masculine’ or have ‘masculinity’ in your community? Is it the result of biology (born‘male’) or culture (learning masculinity)? • Are all men equally masculine in your community? How are differences in masculine behaviour or self-presentation explained? (10 mins) • Feedback(5 mins)

  16. Hegemonic masculinity

  17. Gender is hard work – not about socialisation • There are multiple, competing masculinities – more than 200 have been found in the Dominican Republic! Masculinities are configurations of practice within gender relations, a structure that includes large-scale institutions and economic relations as well as face-to-face relationships and sexuality. Masculinity is institutionalized in this structure, as well as being an aspect of individual character and personality (Connell 2000: 29)

  18. Hegemonic masculinity • Dominant definitions of masculinity are embedded in social institutions such as the state, education, and the family • Male power is not simply held by individual men but is institutionalised in social structures and ideologies that support the gender order in favour of men • Hegemony is not the same as dominance; different definitions and practices of masculinity may supplant others as hegemonic

  19. Hegemonic masculinity (cont.) • Masculinity is contested • It may be that very few men might occupy the hegemonic position • It may be practically impossible to define what hegemonic masculinity objectively is • Men are not only organised hierarchically in relation to women, but also to each other in relations of marginalisation and subordination • All men receive a patriarchal dividend, even if they are excluded from the dominant definitions of masculinity

  20. Hegemonic masculinity (cont.) • Allows for resistance on the part of men who are subordinated or marginalised by the hegemonic form • For example, men who desire men have a subordinate relationship to hegemonic models of masculinity in most societies, but in some places have exercised social power to resist their marginalisation and claim a legitimate social and political space • Is consistent with feminist analyses of patriarchy • Demands a focus on social expectations and community standards rather than personality or behaviour

  21. Masculinity & work

  22. Small group discussion • Discuss one of the following questions: • What challenges are facing young men in your community today? How might these be related to masculinity? • How are men in your community described by health and education officials, media commentators, and men themselves? • Are definitions of masculinity changing in response to wider changes in your community? (10 mins) • Feedback(5 mins)

  23. Masculinity and sexuality • How can masculinity theory make sense of these dynamics? • The hegemonic masculinity framework subsumes desire with its emphasis on gender relations • What might a privileging of sexuality theory offer to such an analysis? • Sexuality is a field in which definitions of masculinity and experiences of men continue to evolve

  24. Marketing men’s bodies Source: The Aristocrat: http://thecrat.com/articles/sex-tourism-when-in-rome/

  25. Men’s bodies as objects • Traditional cultural definitions of masculinity equate femininity with passivity and objectification, while masculinity is associated with activity • Men’s authority in knowledge-making practices rests on their capacity to objectify others while remaining invisible or disembodied • Men are meant to be uninterested in such “superficial” and “feminine” things such as appearance or emotions • Men who are overly focused on their appearance can be accused of being weak or homosexual

  26. Heteronormativity? • Homosociality: relations between heterosexual men regulated by fear of homosexuality • But are gay men and straight men so different? • Changes to men’s embodiment and sexual practices do not always challenge ‘traditional’ notions of heterosexual masculinity

  27. How to include: • ‘gay’ and homosexually active men … • Indigenous men … • ethnic minority men … • boys … • intellectually and physically disabled men … in research on men & masculinity in Caribbean countries?

  28. Non-Western masculinities Understanding men’s sexual activities and desires in order to prevent HIV/AIDS Does standard gender theory or the hegemony/subordination model map onto different cultures the same way? Does sexuality play a different part in the ordering of daily life elsewhere? Source: ilga.org

  29. Summary The future of masculinities? • Challenging binaries that limit our understanding of gender and sexuality: • man/woman, male/female, heterosexual/homosexual, subject/object • Engaging the body and the practices of embodiment to capture lived experience as performative • Conceptualising resistance and agency in the context of social structure and discourse • Embracing Foucault’s notion of power as productive, not simply repressive

  30. Small group discussion • Discuss one of the following questions: • Is there a discussion about male sexuality in your community? Which men and what practices are under scrutiny? • Is male sexuality described as a problem? For women? For men? • Are definitions and images of masculinity changing in your community? Are these changes related to sexuality? How are men responding to such changes?(10 mins) • Feedback (5 mins)

  31. Session 2.Raising boys

  32. Reading and discussion • Read the stories from “Grannitree”(20 mins) • Discuss the stories and ascertain the message that you think each boy is trying to give the reader(10 mins) • Answer one of the following questions: (10 mins) • What’s wrong with boys? • What’s wrong with what happens to boys? • What’s right with boys that we would like to keep and build on? • Report back(20 mins)

  33. Session 3.Changing masculinities

  34. Small group discussion • Objectification: • Martha Nussbaum (1995: 257) defines objectification as: …treating as an object what is really not an object, what is, in fact, a human being • Denial of autonomy • Ownership • Denial of subjectivity • Analyse the images provided • Is objectification present in these examples? • How does it function?(10 mins)

  35. Group discussion • In the larger group, discuss the following questions, drawing on examples: • Who are the viewers invited to gaze on Caribbean men’s bodies as an act of objectification? • What effects might this have for the way we think about Caribbean men? • Are there any positive results of objectification? (10 mins)

  36. Small group discussion • Commodification: • A type of objectification that specifically implies the assigning of a monetary value to something that has not previously or should not be valued in this way • Implies that something is available for buying and selling • In small groups, analyse the images, texts and videos provided • How does commodification function in these examples? (10 mins)

  37. Group discussion • In the larger group, discuss the following questions, drawing on examples from the images: • What is being sold, explicitly and implicitly? • Where and how can this be bought? • What are the effects of commodification for the person or thing that is commodified? (10 mins)

  38. Small group discussion • Anxiety: • One of the effects of objectification and commodification is that masculinity is no longer a taken-for-granted category • In small groups, consider the ways the images, texts and videos may produce anxiety • How might they achieve this? • What form might that anxiety take? (5 mins)

  39. Group discussion • Referring to the images, texts, and videos, discuss the following questions: • How can objectification and commodification create anxiety about Caribbean masculinity? • Do objectification and commodification suggest solutions to Caribbean men’s worries about being masculine enough? • What is the relationship between desirability and masculinity? (10 mins)

  40. Summary • Have shifts in masculinity been net positive or negative for men? • Is this equality with women but in a different way? • What might the future hold for Caribbean men? • Will it be better or worse? (5 mins)

  41. Session 4. Men’s sexual futures

  42. Group discussion Consider the following statements – true? False? Complicated? • Caribbean male marginalisation will eventually make men redundant. • In the future, more men will live alone and not in traditional family units. • More men are going to turn homosexual as it becomes more widely accepted. • Caribbean men are today actively “threatened” by Caribbean women. Question and answer session between facilitator and participants(50 mins)

  43. Conclusion • Covered wide range of issues; issues not covered include: • Men and violence • Wars and civil unrest • Rape and other forms of sexual violence • The connection between sport and coercive sex • Men’s health • Men’s reproductive health • HIV/AIDS and the controversy over male circumcision • Men doing sex work • Men, pornography and sexual obsession • Men as clients of sex workers • Men’s sexual difficulties… many areas for further study

  44. Module adapted for the Anglophone Caribbean by: • Professor John Campbell, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad & Tobago • Original module created by: • Professor Gary W. Dowsett, Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society. With input from Dr Sean Slavin, Ms Gillian Fletcher, Mr Murray Couch, Dr Duane Duncan and Dr Jon Willis • Caribbean short course developed by: • The Caribbean International Resource Network • with the Institute for Gender & Development Studies, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad & Tobago • Original short course developed by: • The Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia and The International Association for the Study of Sexuality, Culture and Society (IASSCS) • With funding from The Ford Foundation • Available under an Attribution, Non-Commercial, Share Alike licence • from Creative Commons

More Related