1 / 40

Marine Geospatial Ecology Tools (MGET) November 2013 Overview Jason Roberts, Ben Best, Daniel Dunn, Eric Treml, and Pat

Marine Geospatial Ecology Tools (MGET) November 2013 Overview Jason Roberts, Ben Best, Daniel Dunn, Eric Treml, and Pat Halpin Duke Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab. The development of MGET was funded by:. Duke Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab. Duke Main Campus Durham, North Carolina.

gitel
Download Presentation

Marine Geospatial Ecology Tools (MGET) November 2013 Overview Jason Roberts, Ben Best, Daniel Dunn, Eric Treml, and Pat

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Marine Geospatial Ecology Tools (MGET) November 2013 Overview Jason Roberts, Ben Best, Daniel Dunn, Eric Treml, and Pat Halpin Duke Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab The development of MGET was funded by:

  2. Duke Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab Duke Main Campus Durham, North Carolina Washington, D.C. Jason Roberts Duke Marine Lab Beaufort, North Carolina Lab Director: Dr. Patrick N. Halpin Dr. Ari Friedlaender Connie Kot Corrie Curtice Daniel Dunn Erin LaBrecque Jerry Moxley Staff and Students: Dr. Andre Boustany Ben Donnelly Daniel Dunn Ei Fujioka Hunter Jones Jesse Cleary Liza Hoos Shay Viehman

  3. What we do Field data collection, analysis and modeling Marine Ecology Applied marine science for sustainable use & conservation Geospatial Analysis Ecoinformatics Linking biological, satellite and ocean observing data Developing innovative data analysis and visualization tools

  4. “From data… New analytic methods Analysis and decision support tools Ecological research …to decisions”

  5. MGET is an ArcGIS toolbox It can also be invoked from many programming languages Over 280 Tools

  6. Many users access MGET from the ModelBuilder capability of ArcGIS

  7. Installation is easy! • Free, open-source software • Requires Windows + ArcGIS + a free Python lib • For full functionality, you need other free software • Open-source GIS may be supported in the future • Easy installer (“just click Next, Next, Next”) • Download and instructions are here: • http://mgel.env.duke.edu/mget/download

  8. The user community as of Nov. 2013 ~3800 installs since August 2009 99 countries

  9. Tour of the tools Let’s see some examples from each toolset…

  10. The first tools we developed:generic HDF/netCDF converters

  11. These evolved to tools specific to popular products

  12. MGET supports a growinglist of products and algorithms Let’s look at some more examples…

  13. Sample 3D and 4D products Chai, F, RC Dugdale, TH Peng, FP Wilkerson, and RT Barber (2002). One-dimensional ecosystem model of the equatorial Pacific upwelling system. Part I: model development and silicon and nitrogen cycle. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography 49: 2713-2745.

  14. Application: analyzing the movements of leatherback sea turtles tracked by satellite telemetry Click here while viewing the slide show to see an animation of one of the tracklines (requires player for .wmv files)

  15. Sampling in 4 dimensions: lat, lon, depth, time Black bars are the depths most frequented by turtle on that day. Research question: are turtles choosing locations and depths based on mesozooplankton density (ROMS-CoSiNE zz2 variable)?

  16. Leatherback movement modeling Schick et al (2008) Bayesian animal movement model Schick RS, Roberts JJ, Eckert SA, Halpin PN, Bailey H, Chai F, Shi L, Clark JS (accepted) Pelagic movements of Pacific Leatherback Turtles (Dermochelyscoriacea) reveal the complex role of prey and ocean currents. Movement Ecology.

  17. Detecting SST fronts • MGET provides tools that detect oceanographic features in remote sensing images • These are some of the most popular tools in MGET Aqua Terra

  18. Daytime SST 03-Jan-2005 Cayula & Cornillon algorithm Mexico Step 1: Histogram analysis ArcGIS model Bimodal Optimal break 27.0 °C Frequency Temperature Example output Step 2: Spatial cohesion test 28.0 °C Mexico Front 25.8 °C Strong cohesion  front present Weak cohesion  no front ~120 km

  19. Application: Modeling density of critically endangered right whales Roberts, Best, Halpin, et al. (in prep)

  20. Detecting mesoscale eddies • This tool detects eddies in SSH images collected by NASA/CNES radar altimeters

  21. Gulf stream eddies Image from http://www.oc.nps.edu/

  22. Okubo-Weiss eddy detection SSH anomaly Example output Aviso DT-MSLA 27-Jan-1993 Red: Anticyclonic Blue: Cyclonic Negative W at eddy core

  23. Application: fisheries ecology • Are tuna and swordfish catches in the northwest Atlantic correlated with eddies? Eddies Hsu A, Boustany AM, Roberts JJ, Halpin PN (in review) The effects of mesoscale eddies on tuna and swordfish catch in the U.S. northwest Atlantic longline fishery. Fish. Oceanogr.

  24. Results A = In anticyclonic eddies C = In cyclonic eddies N = Not in eddies + = positively correlated with CPUE ̶ = negatively correlated with CPUE For tunas, CPUE is higher inside eddies than outside eddies (p < 0.05) For swordfish, CPUE is lower inside eddies than outside eddies (p < 0.05)

  25. Chelton’s eddy database • MGET also includes tools that provide easy access to data products published by other NASA grantees • By improving access to these products from GIS, we hope to increase use by ecologists Chelton, DB, MG Schlax, and RM Samelson (2011). Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies. Progress in Oceanography 91: 167-216.

  26. Spatiotemporal analysisof fisheries

  27. Bigeye CPUE highest in full moon Swordfish exhibits annual periodicity

  28. Daniel Dunn, et al. (2013) Empirical move-on rules to inform fishing strategies: a New England case study. Fish and Fisheries. To avoid damage by slime eels, move on by 3 km for 5 days

  29. Model larval connectivity Ocean currents data Larval density rasters Habitat patches Tool downloads data for the region and dates you specify Edge list feature class representing dispersal network Methods described in Treml et al. (2008, 2012)

  30. Application: modeling dispersal of coral larvae in the Caribbean to assist in systematic conservation planning Click here while viewing the slide show to see a simulation of the dispersal of coral larvae (requires player for .mp4 files) Animation by George Raber

  31. Schill S, Raber G, Roberts JJ, Treml EA, Brenner J (in prep) Designing for Resilience: A regional coral marine connectivity model for the Caribbean Basin and Gulf of Mexico based on NOAA’s Real-Time Ocean Forecast System (RTOFS).

  32. Invoke R from ArcGIS

  33. Predictive species distribution modeling Probability of occurrence predicted from environmental covariates Point observations of species Predictive model Gridded environmental data Binary classification Bathymetry SST Chlorophyll

  34. Application: rockfish habitat models Young MA, Iampietro PJ, Kvitek RG, Garza CD (2010) Multivariate bathymetry-derived generalized linear model accurately predicts rockfish distribution on Cordell Bank, California, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 415: 247–261.

  35. Bathymetry-derived predictor variables Young et al. (2010)

  36. Results: yellowtail rockfish Young et al. (2010)

  37. MGET is not just useful for marine species. How about a terrestrial example involving homo sapiens sapiens habitat? Using Predictive Modeling Methods as a Way of Examining Past Settlement Patterns: An Example From Southern Poland Anna Luczak, University of Wroclaw, Institute of Archaeology, Wroclaw, Poland

  38. Results: Predicted Neolithic Sites Anna Luczak

  39. Acknowledgements A special thanks to the many developers of the open source software that MGET is built upon, including: Guido van Rossum and his many collaborators; Mark Hammond; Travis Oliphant and his collaborators; Walter Moreira and Gregory Warnes; Peter Hollemans; David Ullman, Jean-Francois Cayula, and Peter Cornillon; Stephanie Henson; Tobias Sing, Oliver Sander, NikoBeerenwinkel, and Thomas Lengauer; Frank Warmerdam and his collaborators, Howard Butler; Timothy H. Keitt, Roger Bivand, EdzerPebesma, and Barry Rowlingson; Gerald Evenden; Jeff Whitaker; Roberto De Almeida and his collaborators; Joe Gregorio; David Goodger and his collaborators; Daniel Veillard and his collaborators; Stefan Behnel, MartijnFaassen, and their collaborators; Paul McGuire and his collaborators; Phillip Eby, Bob Ippolito, and their collaborators; Jean-loupGailly and Mark Adler; the developers of netCDF; the developers of HDF Thanks to our funders:

  40. Thank you! Download MGET: http://mgel.env.duke.edu/mget (or Google “MGET”) Email me: jason.roberts@duke.edu If you use MGET, please cite our paper: Roberts, JJ, Best BD, Dunn DC, Treml EA, Halpin PN (2010) Marine Geospatial Ecology Tools: An integrated framework for ecological geoprocessing with ArcGIS, Python, R, MATLAB, and C++. Environmental Modelling & Software 25: 1197-1207.

More Related