1 / 1

Steven J. Price 1,2 , Robert A. Browne 1 and Michael E. Dorcas 2

A. Adult Dusky Salamander. B. Larval Dusky Salamander. C. Adult Two-Lined Salamander. D. Larval Two-Lined Salamander. Modeling the Effects of Urbanization on Stream Salamander Abundances Using a Before-After Control-Impact Design.

gino
Download Presentation

Steven J. Price 1,2 , Robert A. Browne 1 and Michael E. Dorcas 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A. Adult Dusky Salamander B. Larval Dusky Salamander C. Adult Two-Lined Salamander D. Larval Two-Lined Salamander Modeling the Effects of Urbanization on Stream Salamander Abundances Using a Before-After Control-Impact Design Steven J. Price1,2 , Robert A. Browne1 and Michael E. Dorcas2 1Wake Forest University, Department of Biology, Winston-Salem NC 27109 2Davidson College, Department of Biology, Davidson NC 28035 Methods Introduction • Urbanization of stream catchments affects nearby stream ecosystems. • Urban streams are characterized by: • Altered hydrologic flow patterns. • Increased sedimentation, which modifies channel morphology. • Decreased water quality from runoff. • 30 first-order streams in Charlotte-metropolitan area, NC were sampled annually from 2005-2009 • 13 streams urbanized after first year of sampling (i.e., 2005); 17 control (undisturbed) streams • Salamander counts gathered through dipnetting and trapping • Sites surveyed two times each year from March to early May. Urban streams often have increases in sedimentation and modified channels Map of study sites. Circles represent stream locations that were urbanized after the first year of sampling. Triangles are control sites. • Amphibians, especially salamanders, represent the dominant vertebrate biomass in many streams. • Salamanders may be particularly sensitive to urbanization due to a bi-phasic life cycle and complex habitat requirements. • Responses of urbanization may differ among species and stages (i.e., larvae vs. adults) • Abundances (λ) at the local-level were modeled with the Bayesian binomial mixture model developed by Royle (2004) such that: Ni|λi ~ Poi(λi) • Site-level abundance of salamanders was specified bylog(λi) = β0 + β1* urban, where urban was a vector of 1 or 0 dependent on if a site was urbanized (1) or control (0). • Detectability of salamanders was specified by cij|Ni ~ Bin(Ni,pij) • Site-level detection was modeled by logit(pij) = α0 + α1* cover + α2* detritus + α3* rain • Our models used uninformative priors. Posterior summaries were based on 300,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo iterations with a 30,000 sample burn-in and a thinning rate of 5. The northern dusky salamander (Desmognathus fuscus) is common in Piedmont streams. Objective • To estimate larval and adult abundances before, during and after urbanization and compare abundances to those of populations in streams that are not urbanized Collecting salamanders at an urban stream. Results • We counted a total of 6558 dusky and two-lined salamanders between 2005 and 2009 [3889 two-lined salamanders (298 adults and 3591larva) and 2669 dusky salamanders (974 adults and 1695 larva)]. • Detection probabilities for salamanders varied among years, with covariates cover, detritus, and rain having positive, negative, no effects dependent on stage and species. • Abundance Estimates Effects of Urbanization Table 1. Abundance estimates with 95% credible intervals (CI; in parentheses) of dusky salamanders in streams that did not undergo urbanization of catchments and in stream catchments that were urbanized after 2005. Table 2. Abundance estimates with 95% CI (in parentheses) of two-lined salamanders in streams that did not undergo urbanization of catchments and in stream catchments that were urbanized after 2005. Figure 1. Estimates of β (effect of urbanization) on abundances of A) adult dusky salamanders, B) larval dusky salamanders, C) adult two-lined salamanders, and D) southern two-lined salamanders detected in 30 streams in the Charlotte-metropolitan area, NC, USA. Error bars indicate 95% CI. Summary and Conclusions • Previous investigations have indicated that amphibian populations may not respond to urbanization for decades; our findings suggest that response time for stream salamanders is rapid. • By using a BACI design we were able to separate variability in salamander counts among populations due to natural fluctuations from variability in salamander counts among populations due to urbanization. • All salamander species and stages decreased in abundance in urbanized streams and abundances differed from control sites after urbanization. • Species that inhabited terrestrial environments (i.e., two-lined salamander) declined more rapidly than primarily aquatic species (i.e., dusky salamander). • Larval salamanders declined more rapidly than adults likely from increases in sedimentation and changes in water flow patterns. High levels of sedimentation in urban streams likely leads to decreases in salamanders Two-lined salamanders inhabit forests during non-breeding season. Forests are reduced in urbanized catchments. Acknowledgements We thank students in the Davidson College Herpetology Laboratory, particularly W. Anderson, K. Cecala, G. Connette, E. Eskew, E. P. Hill, C. McCoy and D. Millican, who helped collect data for this study. W. R. Costenbader, K. Coffey, S. Davies, R. Harper, L. Hobbs and D. Testerman provided assistance locating study sites. F. Bragg, J. Bragg, B. Eakes, K. Killian, D. Seriff, M. Strawn, T. Waters, and A. White allowed us to sample salamanders on their properties. Comments by Dave Anderson, Melissa Pilgrim, Miles Silman, and Cliff Zeyl greatly improved the manuscript. J. Andrew Royle also provided advice on statistical analysis. This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Award Number DE-FC-09-075R22506. Funding was provided by the Department of Biology at Davidson College, the Davidson Research Initiative funded by the Duke Endowment, the Department of Biology at Wake Forest University, National Science Foundation grant (DEB-0347326) to M.E.D., and Duke Power.

More Related