Thesis writing for law students
Download
1 / 36

Thesis Writing for Law Students - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 257 Views
  • Updated On :

Thesis Writing for Law Students. Prof. Gary Chodorow BFSU 2007-2008 Semester I. Class 1. What is scholarly writing? The process of scholarly writing Inspiration: Choosing a topic & developing a “claim”. WHAT IS SCHOLARLY WRITING?. What Is Scholarly Writing?.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Thesis Writing for Law Students' - gina


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Thesis writing for law students l.jpg

Thesis Writing for Law Students

Prof. Gary Chodorow

BFSU 2007-2008 Semester I


Class 1 l.jpg

Class 1

What is scholarly writing?

The process of scholarly writing

Inspiration: Choosing a topic & developing a “claim”


What is scholarly writing l.jpg
WHAT IS SCHOLARLY WRITING?

What Is Scholarly Writing?

  • Implicitly directed to legislative, executive, and/or judicial decision makers.

  • Normative (informed by a social goal) and prescriptive (recommending a means to that goal).

    • Compare: Literary criticism more interpretive

    • Compare: Natural & social sciences more descriptive


Differences between scholarly writing practical writing l.jpg
Differences Between Scholarly Writing & “Practical” Writing

  • Audience: Primary audience is academicians and interested legal readers (not a judge or client or supervising attorney).

  • Purpose: To inform or educate reader about a law-related claim (not predict legal result or advocate on behalf of client).

    3. Source of topic: Scholarly writing topics are chosen. Practical legal writing “comes with the client.”


Similarities between scholarly writing and practical writing l.jpg
Similarities Between Scholarly Writing and “Practical Writing”

  • Same analytical skills: e.g., analyzing statutes, analyzing cases, using facts, analogy, synthesis.

  • Same writing skills: e.g., CRuPAC, paragraphing, citations, quotations, grammar, usage, punctuation, style.


What makes scholarly legal writing good l.jpg
What Makes Scholarly Legal Writing Good? Writing”

  • An Original, Important, and Timely Thesis—Says something about the law that hasn’t been said before.


What makes scholarly writing good cont d l.jpg
What Makes Scholarly Writing Good? (cont’d) Writing”

  • Comprehensive—Provides sufficient background material to enable any law-school-educated person to understand and evaluate the author’s thesis.

  • Correct—The factual and descriptive material must be accurate.

  • Logical—The presentation must be well reasoned and well organized.

  • Clear and readable style—Must be in a somewhat formal style that avoids both the pompous and the colloquial.


10 sub categories of scholarly legal writing l.jpg
10 Sub-Categories of Scholarly Legal Writing Writing”

  • Case cruncher

  • Law reform article

  • Legislative note

  • Interdisciplinary article

  • Theory-fitting article

  • On legal profession, legal language, legal argument, or legal education

  • Continuing a pre-existing scholarly debate

  • Legal history

  • Comparative law

  • Empirical research


Format of scholarly writing l.jpg
Format of Scholarly Writing Writing”

  • Introduction:

    • Plainly states your claim (a.k.a. thesis)= your original analysis of the legal problem & proposed solution.

    • Roadmap.

  • Background (factual & legal)

  • Analysis

  • Conclusion


  • Format cont d extensive footnotes l.jpg
    Format (cont’d): Writing”Extensive Footnotes

    Three functions:

    • Authority.

    • Attribution.

    • Textual footnotes.


    The process of scholarly writing l.jpg
    THE PROCESS OF SCHOLARLY WRITING Writing”

    The Process of Scholarly Writing

    See handout


    Inspiration choosing a subject developing a claim l.jpg
    Inspiration: Choosing a Subject & Developing a Claim Writing”

    • Choose and narrow your Subject

    • Find a Claim

      Next Week….

    • Test Your Claim

    • Preemption Check


    Choose a subject l.jpg
    CHOOSE A SUBJECT Writing”

    What are you interested in?


    Slide15 l.jpg

    What do you have experience in? Writing”

    Ask a professor, judge, or practicing

    Attorney for an idea.


    Try reading l.jpg
    Try Reading… Writing”

    • Legal writing competition topics*

    • Newspapers & legal newspapers

    • Westlaw Highlights & Lexis Hot Topics*

    • Annual survey issues published in many law reviews

    • Editors’ notes in casebooks

    • Law review articles mention related unresolved issues in the conclusion or in footnotes

    • Law blogs


    Narrow your subject l.jpg
    NARROW YOUR SUBJECT Writing”

    Think narrow & deep,

    not broad & shallow

    Why?

    • To be original: So much has already been written that comments on general trends or overviews of entire areas of law are usually redundant.

    • This makes your research & writing more manageable!


    Slide18 l.jpg

    How to Narrow Your Subject Writing”

    • Determine which of the 10 sub-categories of scholarly writing to fit into.


    Slide19 l.jpg

    Use your imagination like a zoom lens. Writing”

    Micro view

    Medium view

    Macro view


    Slide20 l.jpg

    Categories of argument from Aristotle’s Writing”

    Rhetoric:

    • Definition

    • Comparison

    • Causation

    • Substantiation


    Slide21 l.jpg

    Ask a series of questions: Writing”

    • How can the subject be defined?

    • Is this a new subject?

    • Can the subject be divided into parts or aspects?

    • Can the parts be grouped in any way?

    • Are there analogous subjects?’

    • What are the advantages of this subject or aspect?

    • What are the defects in this subject or aspect?


    Slide22 l.jpg

    Ask a series of questions (cont’d): Writing”

    • What other disciplines deal with the subject and to what end?

    • Is there controversy concerning terminology?

    • Are there disputes concerning theory?

    • Is a definitive solution possible?

    • What future events might affect the subject?

    • Who is affected?

    • Is the subject affected by political or public pressure or vested interest?

    • Who is interested in the subject?


    Find a claim l.jpg
    FIND A CLAIM Writing”

    Claim = Your original analysis of the legal

    problem and proposed solution.

    It is enough to “find one point, one new insight, one new way of looking at a piece of law, and organize your entire article around that. One insight … is all you need.”


    Characteristics of a good claim l.jpg
    Characteristics of a Good Claim Writing”

    Original =

    • Adds something to the body of literature on the topic.

    • Not enough that you came

      up with idea on own.



    Characteristics of a good claim cont d l.jpg
    Characteristics of a Good Claim (cont’d) Writing”

    • Important = not trivial, not obvious, useful.

    • Timely = new & emerging issue or fresh look at old problem.


    Find your claim by a critical reading of the literature on your subject l.jpg
    Find Your Claim by a Critical Reading of the Literature on Your Subject

    Ask questions as you read:

    • What is the text’s thesis?

    • What are the problems the author identifies? (Bias? Over-simplified? Are there other ways to characterize the problem?)

    • Are the facts presented accurately? Does the author characterize authority properly?


    Slide28 l.jpg

    • Is the author’s reasoning clear and logical? (Does the author have an unstated reason for his position? Could other arguments be made?)

    • Does the author make questionable assumptions?

    • Are the author’s conclusions justified by the evidence? What other conclusions could be reached?

    • Does the author respond to potential counter-analyses?

    • If the author’s solution is adopted, what are the likely consequences?


    Slide29 l.jpg

    Read for Argument Type: author have an unstated reason for his position? Could other arguments be made?)


    Slide33 l.jpg

    Read for Jurisprudence author have an unstated reason for his position? Could other arguments be made?): imagine how

    different approaches would affect the

    outcome:

    • Law and Economics

    • Formalism

    • Legal Realism

    • Legal Process

    • Fundamental Rights

    • Critical Legal Studies

    • Feminist Jurisprudence


    Probe the context l.jpg
    Probe the Context author have an unstated reason for his position? Could other arguments be made?)

    • Examine the Legal Context:

      • Legislation: Look at

        • Purpose of statute.

        • Predecessor statute.

        • Other legislative activity on subject.

      • Court decisions:

        • Look at lower court decisions.

        • Compare your case to other cases raising analogous issues.

    • Probe the Broader Context: Do history, sociology, economics, psychology, etc. illuminate the subject?


    Sample reading journal l.jpg
    Sample Reading Journal author have an unstated reason for his position? Could other arguments be made?)

    Citation to source in Bluebook format


    Tips for your reading journal l.jpg
    Tips for Your Reading Journal author have an unstated reason for his position? Could other arguments be made?)

    • In your summary of the source, use quotation marks for 7+ words from the author or for memorable language. (Helps avoid accidental plagiarism).

    • Arrange your reading journal entries by type of source (e.g., statutes, cases, law reviews) or issue.


    ad