1 / 13

Romania’s Progress in Drawing up NSRF 2007-2013

M inist ry of Public Finance of Romania - Managing Aut h orit y for the C ommunity Support Framework -. Romania’s Progress in Drawing up NSRF 2007-2013. 27 October 2005. Romania’s approach to NSRF 2007-2013.

gilead
Download Presentation

Romania’s Progress in Drawing up NSRF 2007-2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ministry of PublicFinance of Romania - Managing Authority for the Community Support Framework - Romania’s Progress in Drawing up NSRF 2007-2013 27 October 2005

  2. Romania’s approach to NSRF 2007-2013 • NDP 2007-2013 drawn up so as to facilitate smooth and swift adaptation into the NSRF, when needed • NDP developed hand in hand with the OPs • Reasons for pragmatic approach: • Multitude of documents needed to be prepared (NDP, NSRF, OPs) • Tight deadline to finalise these documents (December 2005, according to the internal timetable) • Structural and Cohesion Funds – expected to be the main driver of the development policy for 2007-2013 • Achieving coherence in programming

  3. Correlations among programming documents

  4. NSRF structure • Similar to the NDP/CSF, according to the latest draft of the General Regulation: • Situation analysis • Strategy, with thematic/territorial priorities • List of OPs • Indicative financial allocation (including EARDF and EFF) • Additional information: actions for administrative efficiency, ex-ante verification of additionality, co-ordination with the EU cohesion policy • Brief description of institutional arrangements • All these sections are foreseen in the NDP structure

  5. NDP state of play • Socio-economic analysis September 2004 • Development Strategy • First draft March 2005 • Second draft October 2005 • Financial Programming Mid-November 2005

  6. NDP vs. NSRF • NDP 2007-2013 is concentratedon the means and areas of intervention specific to the new Cohesion Policy • Romanian approach: NSRF would be derived from the relevant sections of the NDP (analysis, strategy, financial allocation, implementation) • Major differences: • NDP priorities will be financed not only from the S&CF, but also from other EU funds (EARDF, EFF), indigenous public sources and external loans • No rural development and fisheries priority per se in NSRF – only complementarity mechanisms

  7. Core elements of the NSRF strategy “Convergence” Objective • Increase economic competitiveness • Stimulate knowledge-based development • Ensure higher employability through human resources development • Develop and upgrade basic infrastructure “European Territorial Cooperation” Objective • Cross-border, transnational and inter-regional cooperation

  8. Coherence with EU Strategies • Cohesion CSG – key document in designing NDP/NSRF • All three priority themes in the Cohesion CSG are highly relevant for Romania’s future development • However, the balance between these themes in NSRF must take into account the specific stage of development and the needs of RO as a new MS, confronted with significant external and internal disparities – flexible EC approach

  9. Spatial development • NSRF will interface with the long-term National Strategic Concept of Spatial Development • Specific objectives: • Connection to the European and inter-continental network of spatial development poles and corridors • Balanced development of the urban localities network • Enhancing urban – rural space solidarity • Putting to the best use the natural and cultural patrimony

  10. Urban vectors Centres of transnational importance Metropolitan areas Potential metropolitan areas Urban dimension

  11. Partnership • Given the strong relation between NDP and NSRF, the partnership consultation held so far for NDP covers the entire scope of NSRF • NDP consultation and promotion • National level (ICP, thematic WGs, public debates, information campaigns, dedicated website and e-mail address, CSF MA helpdesk) • Regional and local level (RDP Commitees and WGs, public debates, information campaigns) • Dedicated NSRF partnership: January – March 2006

  12. Timetable for NDP, NRSF and OPs

  13. Issues to be clarified • Level of detail in NSRF • Relation with the National Reform Programme (October 2006) • Timetable correlation with the Agricultural and Fisheries Plans

More Related