1 / 28

Goals today

Goals today. Define Systems of Care and Wraparound Learn how Systems of Care and Wraparound intersect

gilead
Download Presentation

Goals today

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Goals today • Define Systems of Care and Wraparound • Learn how Systems of Care and Wraparound intersect • Learn about Systems of Care and Wraparound implementation efforts at the state & local level through the Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative and at the local level through InterMountain ESD

  2. Systems of Care

  3. Systems of Care (SOC) defined: The systems of care model is an organizational philosophy and framework that involves collaboration across agencies, families, and youth for the purpose of: • improving services • improving access to services • expanding the array of coordinated, community-based services and supports …for children and youth with a serious emotional disorders and their families.

  4. SOC Core Values: The systems of care philosophy is built upon core values1. The core values of the system of care philosophy specify that the system of care: • Should be child centered and family focused, with the needs of the child and family dictating the types and mix of services provided. • Should be community based, with the locus of services as well as management and decision-making responsibility resting at the community level. • Should be culturally competent, with agencies, programs, and services that are responsive to the cultural, racial, and ethnic differences of the populations they serve.

  5. Traditional/Categorical Care Mental Health Child Welfare Juvenile Justice Education Plan Plan Plan Plan Family

  6. Coordinated/Collaborative Care Child Welfare Juvenile Justice Education Mental Health Family One Plan

  7. Pires, S. (2002). Building systems of care: A primer. Washington, D.C.: Human Service Collaborative. System Reform Initiatives

  8. National Results • Education: Children and youth perform better academically and act-out less; families are more engaged; and educators benefit from additional resources, fewer disciplinary problems, improved academic performance, and improved coordination/collaboration with families, MH professionals, and other partners.

  9. Education Results (cont.) • Fewer Disciplinary Problems - expulsions fell by more than 19% - suspensions fell by about 36% - detentions fell by about 34% • Improved Academic Performance - 35% participants improved academic performance after 6 months - 42% improved after 30 months

  10. Education Results (cont.) • Positive Impact on School Attendance - 38% said child’s school attendance improved following onset of treatment • Positive Effect on Chance of Suspension or Expulsion - before treatment, 18.5% of children 6 and up had been expelled or suspended in previous 365 days; - after treatment, only 11% of same population was expelled or suspended following onset of treatment

  11. Wraparound

  12. Wraparound is a Systems of Care Planning Model Systems of Care Values & Principles

  13. Wraparound Principles Family Voice and Choice

  14. Orrego, M. E. & Lazear, K. J. (1998). EQUIPO: Working as Partners to Strengthen Our Community. University of South Florida: Tampa, FL Frontline Practice Shifts

  15. What Does a WraparoundTeam Do? • Explore the family’s vision • Assess strengths and needs • Develop a team mission statement • Prioritize needs • Determine goals and outcomes • Select strategies to meet needs • Assign action steps • Create a crisis & safety plan • Implement action steps and track progress • Evaluate progress and revise strategies • Develop and implement a transition plan

  16. Strengths and Needs Across Life Domains • Psychological & Emotional • Family & Relationships • Home & A Place to live • Social & Recreational • Daily Living & Life Skills • Substance Use & Addictions • Educational & Vocational • Legal • Health & Medical • Crisis & Safety • Spiritual & Cultural • Financial

  17. Phases of Wraparound: What to Expect

  18. Roles within a Wraparound Team

  19. The Wraparound TeamRoles and Responsibilities • Family and Youth • The guiding voice in Wraparound. They inform the team of their unique strengths and needs, and insure that the planning process reflects their preferences, values and culture.

  20. The Wraparound TeamRoles and Responsibilities Wraparound Facilitators/ Care Coordinators • Coordinate the overall care planning, inclusive of short and long-term goals of family and youth for achieving stability and permanency in the community.

  21. The Wraparound TeamRoles and Responsibilities Family/Youth Support Partner • Someone who has ‘walked in the family’s/youth’s shoes’. • Ensure that the youth and family voice is heard and is central in the team process and in all aspects of Wraparound implementation. • Help youth and families understand and navigate the complex systems they are involved in.

  22. Systems of Care in Oregon 2003: The Children’s Mental Health System Change Initiative (CSCI) • Established state and local interagency infrastructure to support SOC • Integrated the funding for high end services into the local or regional managed care environments • Created a uniform process to assess level of need (Level of Service Intensity Determination) 2005: Intensive Community-Based Treatment & Support Services (ICTS) • Established standards for care coordination and child & family team planning

  23. Systems of Care in Oregon 2009 Statewide Wraparound Legislation • House Bill 2144 passed the 2009 Legislative Session providing statutory direction for the Wraparound Initiative. • DHS identified as the lead agency, among partner agencies including Department of Education, Oregon Youth Authority, Commission on Children and Families, and other appropriate agencies involved in the systems of care. • Provides authority to combine resources into single funding pool, seek federal approval or waivers, and adopt rules. • Phase 1 started in July 2010 to improve outcomes for children with high needs in the custody of child welfare by increasing access to care coordination and implementing wraparound to fidelity.

  24. Three Project Demonstration Sites Washington County Mid-Valley Linn County Marion County Polk County Tillamook County Yamhill County Rogue Valley Josephine County Jackson County

  25. Common Goals • Safety • Stabilization • Support • Improvement of symptoms and behaviors • Success at school and in the community

  26. Value Added with Wraparound • Planning is informed by comprehensive knowledge of family and youth • Brings more talent to the table • Offers support and strategies not usually possible within one system • Focus on creating conditions to sustain academic achievement and therapeutic progress in the community

  27. Working together • Greater engagement of family and natural supports • Improved understanding of respective systems • Increased success in the community • Improved academic and family outcomes

  28. Resources • National Wraparound Initiative www.nwi.pdx.edu • Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative www.oregon.gov/OHA/mentalhealth/wraparound/main.shtml

More Related