1 / 10

H AGUE AND MADRID SYSTEMS Moses Moeletsi Chief Director: Policy and Legislation 11 August 2004

H AGUE AND MADRID SYSTEMS Moses Moeletsi Chief Director: Policy and Legislation 11 August 2004. BACKGROUND ⇨ Intellectual property rights (trade marks, patents and designs) are territorial in nature i.e. one has to go to each and every country for registration/protection.

gibsonmary
Download Presentation

H AGUE AND MADRID SYSTEMS Moses Moeletsi Chief Director: Policy and Legislation 11 August 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HAGUE AND MADRIDSYSTEMSMoses MoeletsiChief Director: Policy andLegislation11 August 2004

  2. BACKGROUND ⇨ Intellectual property rights (trade marks, patents and designs) are territorial in nature i.e. one has to go to each and every country for registration/protection. ⇨ The Paris Convention regulate how territorial registration should be conducted. ⇨ There are four other treaties which deals with the international registration/deposit of intellectual property rights (IP), namely: • Patent Co-operation Treaty (PCT) for “international” registration of patents. • Hague Agreement 1960; Geneva Act 1999 for international deposit of designs (Hague System). • Madrid Agreement 1891; Madrid Protocol 1989 for “international” registration of trade marks (Madrid System).

  3. • Budapest Treaty – for international deposit of microbes/micro-organisms. ⇨ International registration is where the applicant just ticks/designate in one form member states which he or she seeks protection. ⇨ In the case of international deposit, all designs are registered at a central point, namely, at WIPO level. ⇨ South Africa is member of the Patent Co-operation Treaty, Budapest Treaty and the Paris Convention.

  4. HOW DOES THE MADRID PROTOCOL WORK? ⇨ Facilitate international registration, maintenance and renewals (national laws still apply). ⇨ Protocol is less rigid, e.g. choice of language French/English. ⇨ Allows 18 months for processing the applications instead of 12 months (Madrid Agreement).

  5. HOW DOES THE HAGUE SYSTEM WORK? ⇨ Facilitate the establishment and maintenance of design protection through a single international deposits of member states. ⇨ The Geneva Act seeks to make the system more responsive to the needs of users. ⇨ Provides for the participation of regional systems, e.g. European Patent Office (EPO), African Regional Industrial Property Office (ARIPO).

  6. WHAT ARE THE BENEFIT FOR JOINING THE MADRID AND HAGUE SYSTEMS? ⇨ Offer advantages to IP owners, registration offices and member states. ⇨ Effective and quicker registration and protection of their rights by offering a single registration process for a number of designated countries. ⇨ Generates greater activity in IP and generates fee income for member states, e.g. PCT in South Africa. ⇨ SA trading partners are members of the Madrid and Hague systems.

  7. WHAT MEASURES ARE PUT IN PLACE IN ORDER TO COPE WITH THE INCREASED NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS? ⇨ For the Hague System, there are two personnel. They will undergo the training with WIPO. ⇨ For the Madrid Protocol, there are ten examiners who are well trained.

  8. WHICH PROBLEMS ARE ADDRESSED BY THE RATIFICATION OF THE TWO SYSTEMS? ⇨ Cost effective and quicker registration in designated countries. No longer necessary to go from one country to another. ⇨ Increased activities on IP in Registries and the country. ⇨ Market access in other jurisdictions. ⇨ Protection of investors and IP holders and building confidence. ⇨ Foreign direct investment into the country.

  9. HOW DOES THE RATIFICATION OF THE TREATIES RELATE TO THE CCRD’s AND THE dti’s OBJECTIVE? ⇨ Market access. ⇨ Foreign direct investment (trade marks). ⇨ Confidence building for investors. ⇨ Harmonization of IP laws with those of trading partners. ⇨ Provide a fair and equitable framework in IP area. ⇨ Competitiveness

  10. CONCLUSION Ratification to these international instruments will enable South Africa to compete in the globalized world. The country, IP users, and the CIPRO will immensely benefit.

More Related