The mid semester review bridge the gap
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 17

The Mid-Semester Review – Bridge the Gap PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 41 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The Mid-Semester Review – Bridge the Gap. Barbara Vohmann, D ean Bowyer, Debbie Philipson, Pauline Start, Mark Tree, Dr. Julian Priddle. Introduction.

Download Presentation

The Mid-Semester Review – Bridge the Gap

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The mid semester review bridge the gap

The Mid-Semester Review – Bridge the Gap

Barbara Vohmann, Dean Bowyer, Debbie Philipson, Pauline Start,

Mark Tree, Dr. Julian Priddle.


Introduction

Introduction

  • This study considered the efficacy of the Mid-Semester Review (MSR) that is used in the Department of Engineering and the Built Environment (EBE)

  • The MSR intends to identify good and bad features of a module in a timely way so that improvement may be made.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

Feedback is collected from students in a number of ways: -

  • Institutional: Module Evaluation Questionnaires (MEQ), National Student Survey, Student Experience Survey

  • 'Informal': collecting feedback through a variety of mechanisms

  • 'One-off' versus 'Always open'

  • Additional surveys, including a mid-semester implementation of the MEQ

  • Online feedback tools such as VLE discussion or ‘post-it walls’ such as Padlet

  • In-class response tools such as PollEverywhere

  • In-class discussion

  • Direct dialogue, in personal tutorials, and with course reps.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

Most staff use a range of methods (4 or 5), and staff who believe in the values of mid-module feedback are likely to use more mechanisms

The institutional approach (MEQ) - pluses and minuses

Pluses:

  • Consistent approach

  • Data collection integrated with institutional processes

    Minuses:

  • Questionnaire may not collect relevant data

  • Timing may not allow prompt response.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

In an online survey of university staff, we found that staff already use some form of mid-module feedback: -

  • A surprisingly large proportion of respondents indicated that they already used a mid-module survey (39%) or would like to use one (36%)

  • Most felt mid-module surveys are positive. The main concern was that students may be over-surveyed

  • 21% of respondents agreed that the Module Evaluation Survey (MES) provides effective feedback on modules, and only 12% agreed that the MES is taken seriously by students.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

As a staff member, what feedback do you want?

  • The EBE MSR originated with a 'how are you coping' survey. It was implemented across the department, bringing in some MEQ-like questions.


Relationship between mid semester review and module evaluation survey

Relationship between mid-semester review and module evaluation survey


The mid semester review bridge the gap

  • What does this mean? Students have already made up their minds? Or failure to act on their feedback?

  • We saw a need to revise the mid-semester review, to enhance the student experience rather than merely predict it.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

  • We met as a team to discuss this, and also consulted with Department staff, then revised the Mid-Semester Review questions

  • We also re-named it the Student Progress Review

  • The focus now was towards the student thinking about their own engagement with a module and what support students needed, as well as what they thought of the subject matter.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

Questions for discussion

What would you as a student like to be asked in module evaluation?

How do you think students should receive feedback from module evaluation?


The student view was

The student view was

  • Teaching quality was perceived as the major topic, followed by communication with staff, module organization and resources

  • Students were not confident that the feedback that they provided through the mid-module survey is considered seriously

  • Students were not certain that their feedback through the mid-module survey is treated confidentially

  • Some of the comments that students wished to make related to individual staff, and the mid-module survey is neither an effective nor an appropriate way to do this

  • Students wished to have teaching staff present the main conclusions from their feedback on modules

  • Students needed to know what changes were made following their feedback.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

Question for discussion

How can we as a university bridge the gap between staff and student perspectives?


The mid semester review bridge the gap

Conclusions and feedback.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

What works and what doesn't work? Good practice

  • If you are collecting mid-module feedback using survey tools, ensure that questions cover aspects that are relevant to students and that can be answered unequivocally

  • Whatever way you use to collect feedback from students, make sure that you have a strategy for responding and making any necessary change

  • Make your responses are public, even if the feedback or question comes from a single student (unless there are issues of confidentiality)

  • Don’t confuse students with several different survey tools, and if possible use similar approaches in the modules within a course.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

  • Make sure that students understand the difference between what you are collecting as feedback and the institutional surveys such as MEQs and the SES

  • Encourage students to provide constructive feedback that can be used effectively, and emphasise that negative comments without contextual information are ineffective in creating positive change.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

  • Students tend to view mid-semester feedback as a means of judging modules, so use such feedback as an opportunity to revise in light of students’ views prior to module evaluation at the end of a module

  • Provide a short PowerPoint to provide brief feedback to tell your students what you are changing to help meet their needs

  • Course group leaders are encouraged to liaise with their students and advise them as to changes being made following student feedback.


The mid semester review bridge the gap

Thank you for listening and contributing.


  • Login